Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shaoxing People's Hospital (Shaoxing Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine) , Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China.
Department of Surgery, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Southeast University School of Medicine , Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Postgrad Med. 2020 Jun;132(5):419-425. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2020.1734342. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
Early oral feeding (EOF) is considered to be an important component of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), but raises the concern of increased risk of anastomotic leakage (AL) in patients receiving esophagectomy. This review aimed to elucidate the correlation of EOF and the incidence of AL after esophageal resection.
We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar from their inception to February 2020 for published articles that compared AL after EOF (oral feeding initiated within postoperative day [POD] 3) vs. conventional feeding regimen (nil-by-mouth with enteral tube nutrition support, until oral feeding since POD 4 and beyond) following esophagectomy.
A total of 11 full articles were included in this review, including 5 registered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 6 observational studies that compared EOF with conventional care after esophagectomy. Meta-analysis was not possible due to significant heterogeneity, bias, and small sample sizes. Among the 11 included studies, 9 (including the 5 RCTs) showed that EOF did not increase AL rate, whereas the other 2 retrospective studies indicated that delayed oral feeding resulted in fewer AL.
EOF after esophagectomy probably does not increase the incidence of AL, and it is a promising strategy in line with the essence of ERAS. However, more and better evidence from high-quality RCTs are still needed.
早期口服喂养(EOF)被认为是术后加速康复(ERAS)的重要组成部分,但它引发了人们对接受食管切除术的患者吻合口漏(AL)风险增加的担忧。本综述旨在阐明 EOF 与食管切除术后 AL 发生率之间的相关性。
我们检索了 PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、Cochrane Library 和 Google Scholar 从建库至 2020 年 2 月发表的比较 EOF(术后第 3 天内开始口服喂养)与常规喂养方案(无口服,肠内营养管支持,直到术后第 4 天及以后开始口服)后食管切除术后 AL 发生率的文章。
本综述共纳入 11 篇全文,包括 5 项注册随机对照试验(RCT)和 6 项观察性研究,比较了食管切除术后 EOF 与常规治疗。由于存在显著的异质性、偏倚和小样本量,Meta 分析不可行。在纳入的 11 项研究中,有 9 项(包括 5 项 RCT)表明 EOF 并未增加 AL 发生率,而另外 2 项回顾性研究表明延迟口服喂养可减少 AL 的发生。
食管切除术后 EOF 可能不会增加 AL 的发生率,这是符合 ERAS 本质的有前途的策略。然而,仍需要更多高质量 RCT 的高质量证据。