Padela Aasim I, Klima Katherine, Duivenbode Rosie
Initiative on Islam and Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
New Bioeth. 2020 Mar;26(1):17-37. doi: 10.1080/20502877.2020.1729575. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
Biomedicine has opened up new possibilities for parenthood. Once resigned to remaining childless or pursuing adoption, infertile couples can now pursue options such as gamete donation, in-vitro fertilization, and uterine transplantation, as well as surrogacy. Muslim thinkers have viewed these strategies with both promise and caution given new types of kinship and parenthood result. By drawing upon leading medical academy resolutions this paper critically analyses Islamic normative views on the production of parenthood. We start with an overview of the Sunni rulings on gamete donation, gestational surrogacy and uterus transplantation, and the rationale and scriptural sources that undergird these moral assessments. Next, we discuss the contested relational bonds in light of larger discussions on genetics and the preservation of lineage. Finally, we comment on how scientific data, social imaginaries, and empirical gaps impact Islamic normativity regarding the production of parenthood so as to inform more holistic Islamic bioethical assessments.
生物医学为生育带来了新的可能性。曾经只能无奈接受无子女的现状或选择收养的不孕夫妇,如今可以寻求诸如配子捐赠、体外受精、子宫移植以及代孕等方式。鉴于新型亲属关系和亲子关系的产生,穆斯林思想家对这些方法既抱有希望,又持谨慎态度。本文通过借鉴顶尖医学学术机构的决议,批判性地分析了伊斯兰教关于生育的规范性观点。我们首先概述逊尼派对于配子捐赠、妊娠代孕和子宫移植的裁决,以及支撑这些道德评估的基本原理和经文依据。接下来,我们结合关于遗传学和血统传承的更广泛讨论,探讨存在争议的亲属关系纽带。最后,我们评论科学数据、社会想象和经验空白如何影响伊斯兰教关于生育的规范性,以便为更全面的伊斯兰生物伦理评估提供参考。