Centre for Positive Ageing, HammondCare, 4 Spicer Ave, Hammondville, NSW, 2170, Australia.
School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 24;20(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4977-1.
Reablement has potential for enhancing function and independence in people with dementia. In order to enhance the use of evidence-based reablement in this population, this study sought to understand the current practices and needs of the sector around these interventions.
A purposive sample of 22 Australian aged and community-care providers participated in a semi-structured interview. Qualitative content analysis was applied to the data, with key themes interpreted within the context of the study aims: to explore (1) what reablement interventions are currently being offered to people living with dementia in Australia, and (2) what are key factors that will contribute to enhanced uptake of reablement interventions in dementia practice.
Four themes emerged: (1) 'what reablement interventions are being offered', outlined a range of exercise and cognitive/social interventions, with only a proportion generated from a clear evidence-base, (2) 'what's in a name', illustrated the range of terms used to describe reablement, (3) 'whose role is it', highlighted the confusion around the range of health professionals involved in providing reablement interventions, and (4) 'perceived barriers and enablers to providing reablement to people living with dementia', described a range of factors that both hinder and support current reablement practice.
Reablement interventions currently provided for people living with dementia in Australia are variable, with confusion around the definition of reablement, and apparently limited use of evidence-informed interventions. A multifaceted approach involving an evidence-informed and freely-accessible resource, and taking into account the varied levels of influence within the aged care sector would support uptake and implementation of reablement interventions for people living with dementia.
再能力化对提高痴呆症患者的功能和独立性具有潜力。为了增强该人群对基于证据的再能力化的使用,本研究旨在了解该领域当前在这些干预措施方面的实践和需求。
采用目的性抽样法,选取 22 名澳大利亚老年和社区护理提供者参与半结构式访谈。对数据进行了定性内容分析,主要主题在研究目的的背景下进行了解释:(1)探索澳大利亚目前为患有痴呆症的人提供哪些再能力化干预措施,以及(2)促进在痴呆症实践中增强再能力化干预措施的采用的关键因素。
出现了四个主题:(1)“目前提供哪些再能力化干预措施”,概述了一系列锻炼和认知/社会干预措施,只有一部分是基于明确的证据基础,(2)“名称的含义”,说明了再能力化的各种术语,(3)“谁的角色”,突出了提供再能力化干预措施的卫生专业人员的范围混淆,以及(4)“为患有痴呆症的人提供再能力化的感知障碍和促进因素”,描述了一系列既阻碍又支持当前再能力化实践的因素。
澳大利亚目前为患有痴呆症的人提供的再能力化干预措施各不相同,再能力化的定义存在混淆,显然对基于证据的干预措施的使用有限。一种多方面的方法,包括一个基于证据的和免费获得的资源,并考虑到老年护理行业内的不同层次的影响力,将支持为患有痴呆症的人实施再能力化干预措施。