• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Finding lupus in the ANA haystack.在抗核抗体的干草堆中寻找狼疮。
Lupus Sci Med. 2020 Feb 2;7(1):e000384. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2020-000384. eCollection 2020.
2
Autoantibodies predate the onset of systemic lupus erythematosus in northern Sweden.自身抗体先于系统性红斑狼疮在瑞典北部发病。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2011 Feb 22;13(1):R30. doi: 10.1186/ar3258.
3
Utility of the AVISE Connective Tissue Disease test in predicting lupus diagnosis and progression.AVISE 连接组织疾病检测在预测狼疮诊断和进展中的效用。
Lupus Sci Med. 2020 Mar 18;7(1):e000345. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2019-000345. eCollection 2020.
4
Autoantibodies in SLE: prediction and the value matrix.SLE 中的自身抗体:预测和价值矩阵。
Lupus. 2019 Oct;28(11):1285-1293. doi: 10.1177/0961203319868531. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
5
Comparison between multiplex assays for autoantibody detection in systemic lupus erythematosus.多种自身抗体检测方法在系统性红斑狼疮中的比较。
J Immunol Methods. 2010 Jun 30;358(1-2):75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2010.04.005. Epub 2010 May 9.
6
[Modern look at the problems of investigation of antinuclear antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus (literature review).].[系统性红斑狼疮中抗核抗体检测问题的现代研究视角(文献综述)。]
Klin Lab Diagn. 2018;63(6):340-348. doi: 10.18821/0869-2084-2018-63-6-340-348.
7
Comparison of chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay, indirect immunofluorescence assay, linear immunoassay and multiple microbead immunoassay detecting autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus.化学发光微粒子免疫分析、间接免疫荧光法、线性免疫分析法和多重微球免疫分析检测系统性红斑狼疮自身抗体的比较。
Scand J Immunol. 2020 Mar;91(3):e12849. doi: 10.1111/sji.12849. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
8
Sensitivity and specificity of ANA and anti-dsDNA in the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus: a comparison using control sera obtained from healthy individuals and patients with multiple medical problems.抗核抗体和抗双链 DNA 在系统性红斑狼疮诊断中的敏感性和特异性:使用来自健康个体和患有多种医学问题的患者的对照血清进行比较。
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2013 Dec;31(4):292-8. doi: 10.12932/AP0272.31.4.2013.
9
Complement activation products vs standard ANA testing: Treatment outcomes, diagnosis, and economic impact (CAPSTONE) in systemic lupus erythematosus.补体激活产物与标准抗核抗体检测:系统性红斑狼疮的治疗结果、诊断及经济影响(CAPSTONE)
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Sep;28(9):1021-1032. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.22039. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
10
Dysregulation of innate and adaptive serum mediators precedes systemic lupus erythematosus classification and improves prognostic accuracy of autoantibodies.先天性和适应性血清介质失调先于系统性红斑狼疮的分类,并提高自身抗体的预后准确性。
J Autoimmun. 2016 Nov;74:182-193. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
A presentation of systemic lupus erythematosus manifesting as abdominal pain: a case report.以腹痛为表现的系统性红斑狼疮病例报告
J Med Case Rep. 2025 Jul 31;19(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s13256-025-05451-4.
2
Identifying antinuclear antibody positive individuals at risk for developing systemic autoimmune disease: development and validation of a real-time risk model.识别抗核抗体阳性个体患系统性自身免疫性疾病的风险:实时风险模型的建立和验证。
Front Immunol. 2024 Mar 20;15:1384229. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1384229. eCollection 2024.
3
Comparison of late-onset and non-late-onset systemic lupus erythematosus individuals in a real-world electronic health record cohort.真实世界电子健康记录队列中迟发性和非迟发性系统性红斑狼疮个体的比较。
Lupus. 2024 Apr;33(5):525-531. doi: 10.1177/09612033241238052. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
4
Novel biomarker discovery through comprehensive proteomic analysis of lupus mouse serum.通过对狼疮鼠血清进行全面蛋白质组学分析发现新型生物标志物。
J Autoimmun. 2024 Jan;142:103134. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2023.103134. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
5
Phenotype Risk Score but Not Genetic Risk Score Aids in Identifying Individuals With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in the Electronic Health Record.表型风险评分而非遗传风险评分有助于在电子健康记录中识别系统性红斑狼疮患者。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023 Sep;75(9):1532-1541. doi: 10.1002/art.42544. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
6
Emerging Molecular Markers Towards Potential Diagnostic Panels for Lupus.新兴分子标志物有望成为狼疮的潜在诊断面板。
Front Immunol. 2022 Jan 13;12:808839. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.808839. eCollection 2021.
7
Autoantibody Discovery, Assay Development and Adoption: Death Valley, the Sea of Survival and Beyond.自身抗体发现、检测方法开发与应用:死亡谷、生存之海及其他。
Front Immunol. 2021 May 27;12:679613. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.679613. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Utility of the AVISE Connective Tissue Disease test in predicting lupus diagnosis and progression.AVISE 连接组织疾病检测在预测狼疮诊断和进展中的效用。
Lupus Sci Med. 2020 Mar 18;7(1):e000345. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2019-000345. eCollection 2020.
2
Randomised prospective trial to assess the clinical utility of multianalyte assay panel with complement activation products for the diagnosis of SLE.评估含补体激活产物的多分析物检测组合对系统性红斑狼疮诊断的临床效用的随机前瞻性试验。
Lupus Sci Med. 2019 Sep 19;6(1):e000349. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2019-000349. eCollection 2019.
3
Shared and unique immune alterations in pre-clinical autoimmunity.临床前自身免疫中共享和独特的免疫改变。
Curr Opin Immunol. 2019 Dec;61:60-68. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2019.08.006. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
4
Interferon pathway in SLE: one key to unlocking the mystery of the disease.系统性红斑狼疮中的干扰素通路:解开该疾病谜团的关键之一。
Lupus Sci Med. 2019 Aug 13;6(1):e000270. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2018-000270. eCollection 2019.
5
Complement Activation in Patients With Probable Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Ability to Predict Progression to American College of Rheumatology-Classified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.补体激活与可能的系统性红斑狼疮患者向美国风湿病学会分类的系统性红斑狼疮的进展预测能力。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020 Jan;72(1):78-88. doi: 10.1002/art.41093. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
6
Latent autoimmunity across disease-specific boundaries in at-risk first-degree relatives of SLE and RA patients.狼疮和类风湿关节炎患者的一级亲属中存在跨越疾病特异性界限的潜在自身免疫。
EBioMedicine. 2019 Apr;42:76-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.03.063. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
7
Study of Anti-Malarials in Incomplete Lupus Erythematosus (SMILE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.不完全性红斑狼疮抗疟药研究(SMILE):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Dec 20;19(1):694. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3076-7.
8
Brief Report: How Do Patients With Newly Diagnosed Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Present? A Multicenter Cohort of Early Systemic Lupus Erythematosus to Inform the Development of New Classification Criteria.简要报告:新诊断的系统性红斑狼疮患者的表现如何?一个多中心的早期系统性红斑狼疮队列研究为新的分类标准的制定提供信息。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Jan;71(1):91-98. doi: 10.1002/art.40674. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
9
Early Lupus Project: one-year follow-up of an Italian cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus of recent onset.早期狼疮项目:对意大利一组近期发病的系统性红斑狼疮患者进行的一年随访。
Lupus. 2018 Aug;27(9):1479-1488. doi: 10.1177/0961203318777112. Epub 2018 May 19.
10
Early symptoms of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) recalled by 339 SLE patients.339名系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者回忆起的系统性红斑狼疮早期症状。
Lupus. 2018 Aug;27(9):1431-1436. doi: 10.1177/0961203318776093. Epub 2018 May 17.

在抗核抗体的干草堆中寻找狼疮。

Finding lupus in the ANA haystack.

机构信息

Division of Medicine, Penn State Milton S Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Lupus Sci Med. 2020 Feb 2;7(1):e000384. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2020-000384. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1136/lupus-2020-000384
PMID:32095251
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7008709/
Abstract

Diagnosis of SLE in early stages is challenging due to the heterogeneous nature of presenting symptoms and the poor performance metrics of the screening ANA test. Even the more specific double-stranded DNA autoantibody has relatively low predictive value in early disease. A consequence is delayed referral, with the likelihood that some patients have progression of disease prior to specialist evaluation. Tests that might fill this diagnostic gap are therefore needed. The AVISE Connective Tissue Disease Test that uses a multiplex approach to detect autoantibodies and cell-bound complement products has shown utility in distinguishing SLE from other rheumatological conditions. Whether it might be useful in early disease stages to predict progression is addressed in a recent study by Liang and colleagues, who tested clinic patients who had non-specific findings with the objective of determining whether AVISE could predict onset of SLE. While this test provided more useful prognostic information than other available diagnostics, it had relatively low sensitivity, suggesting that significant numbers of patients with preclinical SLE would be missed by this screening. The need remains for development of diagnostics with robust sensitivity and specificity in early disease that would also deliver prognostic information about risk for SLE. Such tests would have great value as a tool for primary providers to more efficiently triage ANA-positive patients for appropriate specialty evaluation.

摘要

由于临床表现的异质性和筛查 ANA 试验的性能指标不佳,早期诊断 SLE 具有挑战性。即使是更特异的双链 DNA 自身抗体在早期疾病中的预测价值也相对较低。其结果是延迟转诊,一些患者在接受专科评估之前,疾病可能已经进展。因此,需要寻找可以填补这一诊断空白的检测方法。使用多重检测方法检测自身抗体和细胞结合补体产物的 AVISE 结缔组织疾病检测在区分 SLE 与其他风湿病方面显示出一定的效用。 Liang 及其同事最近进行的一项研究探讨了该检测方法在早期疾病阶段预测疾病进展方面的作用,他们对具有非特异性表现的临床患者进行了检测,目的是确定 AVISE 是否可以预测 SLE 的发病。虽然该检测方法比其他现有诊断方法提供了更有用的预后信息,但它的敏感性相对较低,表明通过这种筛查可能会错过大量有临床前 SLE 的患者。因此,仍需要开发在早期疾病中具有稳健敏感性和特异性的诊断方法,该方法还能提供关于 SLE 风险的预后信息。此类检测方法作为一种工具,对初级保健提供者对 ANA 阳性患者进行适当的专科评估具有重要价值。