• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项评估利用移动技术收集和传输临床试验数据可行性的试点研究。

A Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility of Collecting and Transmitting Clinical Trial Data with Mobile Technologies.

作者信息

Russell Colleen, Ammour Nadir, Wells Toby, Bonnet Nicolas, Kruse Matthias, Tardat Agnes, Erales Christel, Shook Thomas, Kirkesseli Stephane, Hovsepian Lionel, Pretorius Sy

机构信息

PAREXEL International, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.

Sanofi-Aventis Recherche & Développement, Chilly-Mazarin, France.

出版信息

Digit Biomark. 2018 Nov 7;2(3):126-138. doi: 10.1159/000493883. eCollection 2018 Sep-Dec.

DOI:10.1159/000493883
PMID:32095763
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7015356/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of mobile technologies for data capture and transmission has the potential to streamline clinical trials, but researchers lack methods for collecting, processing, and interpreting data from these tools.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the performance of a technical platform for collecting and transmitting data from six mobile technologies in the clinic and at home, to apply methods for comparing them to clinical standard devices, and to measure their usability, including how willing subjects were to use them on a regular basis.

METHODS

In part 1 of the study, conducted over 3 weeks in the clinic, we tested two device pairs (mobile vs. clinical standard blood pressure monitor and mobile vs. clinical standard spirometer) on 25 healthy volunteers. In part 2 of the study, conducted over 3 days both in the clinic and at home, we tested the same two device pairs as in part 1, plus four additional pairs (mobile vs. clinical standard pulse oximeter, glucose meter, weight scale, and activity monitor), on 22 healthy volunteers.

RESULTS

Data collection reliability was 98.1% in part 1 of the study and 95.8% in part 2 (the percentages exclude the wearable activity monitor, which collects data continuously). In part 1, 20 of 1,049 overall expected measurements were missing (1.9%), and in part 2, 45 of 1,083 were missing (4.2%). The most common reason for missing data was a single malfunctioning spirometer (13 of 20 total missed readings) in part 1, and that the subject did not take the measurement (22 of 45 total missed readings) in part 2. Also in part 2, a higher proportion of at-home measurements than in-clinic readings were missing (12.6 vs. 2.7%). The data from this experimental study were unable to establish repeatability or agreement for every mobile technology; only the pulse oximeter demonstrated repeatability, and only the weight scale demonstrated agreement with the clinical standard device. Most mobile technologies received high "willingness to use" ratings from the patients on the questionnaires.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that the wireless data transmission and processing platform was dependable. It also identified three critical areas of study for advancing the use of mobile technologies in clinical research: (1) if a mobile technology captures more than one type of endpoint (such as blood pressure and pulse), repeatability and agreement may need to be established for each endpoint to be included in a clinical trial; (2) researchers need to develop criteria for excluding invalid device readings (to be identified by algorithms in real time) for the population studied using ranges based on accumulated subject data and established norms; and (3) careful examination of a mobile technology's performance (reliability, repeatability, and agreement with accepted reference devices) during pilot testing is essential, even for medical devices approved by regulators.

摘要

背景

使用移动技术进行数据采集和传输有潜力简化临床试验,但研究人员缺乏从这些工具收集、处理和解释数据的方法。

目的

评估一个技术平台在诊所和家庭中从六种移动技术收集和传输数据的性能,应用将这些技术与临床标准设备进行比较的方法,并衡量它们的可用性,包括受试者定期使用它们的意愿。

方法

在研究的第1部分,在诊所进行了3周,我们在25名健康志愿者身上测试了两对设备(移动设备与临床标准血压监测仪以及移动设备与临床标准肺活量计)。在研究的第2部分,在诊所和家庭中都进行了3天,我们在22名健康志愿者身上测试了与第1部分相同的两对设备,另外还有四对(移动设备与临床标准脉搏血氧仪、血糖仪、体重秤和活动监测仪)。

结果

在研究的第1部分,数据收集可靠性为98.1%,在第2部分为95.8%(这些百分比不包括持续收集数据的可穿戴活动监测仪)。在第1部分,1049个总体预期测量值中有20个缺失(1.9%),在第2部分,1083个中有45个缺失(4.2%)。数据缺失的最常见原因在第1部分是一个肺活量计故障(20个总缺失读数中的13个),在第2部分是受试者未进行测量(45个总缺失读数中的22个)。同样在第2部分,家庭测量中缺失的比例高于诊所读数(分别为12.6%和2.7%)。这项实验研究的数据无法为每种移动技术确立重复性或一致性;只有脉搏血氧仪显示出重复性,只有体重秤显示出与临床标准设备的一致性。大多数移动技术在问卷中获得了患者较高的“使用意愿”评分。

结论

本研究表明无线数据传输和处理平台是可靠的。它还确定了在临床研究中推进移动技术使用的三个关键研究领域:(1)如果一种移动技术捕获多种类型的终点(如血压和脉搏),可能需要为临床试验中要纳入的每个终点确立重复性和一致性;(2)研究人员需要制定排除无效设备读数的标准(通过算法实时识别),该标准基于积累的受试者数据和既定规范的范围针对所研究的人群;(3)即使对于监管机构批准的医疗设备,在试点测试期间仔细检查移动技术的性能(可靠性、重复性以及与公认参考设备的一致性)也至关重要。

相似文献

1
A Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility of Collecting and Transmitting Clinical Trial Data with Mobile Technologies.一项评估利用移动技术收集和传输临床试验数据可行性的试点研究。
Digit Biomark. 2018 Nov 7;2(3):126-138. doi: 10.1159/000493883. eCollection 2018 Sep-Dec.
2
Effect of Prior Health Knowledge on the Usability of Two Home Medical Devices: Usability Study.健康知识储备对两款家用医疗设备可用性的影响:可用性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 21;8(9):e17983. doi: 10.2196/17983.
3
Electronic physiologic and subjective data acquisition in home-dwelling heart failure patients: An assessment of patient use and perception of usability.居家心力衰竭患者的电子生理和主观数据采集:患者使用情况及可用性感知评估
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Sep;93:42-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
4
Validity of mobile electronic data capture in clinical studies: a pilot study in a pediatric population.移动电子数据采集在临床研究中的有效性:儿科人群的初步研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Dec 8;17(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0438-x.
5
Exploring the Impact of a Mobile Health Solution for Postpartum Pelvic Floor Muscle Training: Pilot Randomized Controlled Feasibility Study.探索移动健康解决方案对产后盆底肌肉训练的影响: 初步随机对照可行性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jul 11;7(7):e12587. doi: 10.2196/12587.
6
Patient preferences for using mobile technologies in clinical trials.患者在临床试验中使用移动技术的偏好。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Jun 20;15:100399. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100399. eCollection 2019 Sep.
7
A Wearable Pulse Oximeter With Wireless Communication and Motion Artifact Tailoring for Continuous Use.一种具有无线通信和运动伪影定制功能的可穿戴脉搏血氧仪,可实现连续使用。
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2019 Jun;66(6):1505-1513. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2018.2874885. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
8
Erratum.勘误
Mult Scler. 2016 Oct;22(12):NP9-NP11. doi: 10.1177/1352458515585718. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
9
Reliability and validity of a mobile phone for radiographic assessment of ankle injuries: a randomized inter- and intraobserver agreement study.手机用于踝关节损伤放射学评估的可靠性和有效性:一项随机的观察者间和观察者内一致性研究。
Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Feb;34(2):228-33. doi: 10.1177/1071100712466849. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
10
Usability Evaluation of an Offline Electronic Data Capture App in a Prospective Multicenter Dementia Registry (digiDEM Bayern): Mixed Method Study.前瞻性多中心痴呆症登记处(巴伐利亚数字痴呆症登记处)中一款离线电子数据采集应用程序的可用性评估:混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Nov 3;5(11):e31649. doi: 10.2196/31649.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient and clinician use characteristics and perceptions of pulse oximeter use: A scoping review.患者及临床医生对脉搏血氧仪使用的特征与认知:一项范围综述
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Mar 18;162:104735. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104735.
2
A systematic review of methods used to conduct decentralised clinical trials.系统评价去中心化临床试验中使用的方法。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Jun;88(6):2843-2862. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15205. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
3
Minimizing the Impact of the COVID-19 Epidemic on Oncology Clinical Trials: Retrospective Study of Beijing Cancer Hospital.将 COVID-19 疫情对肿瘤学临床试验的影响降到最低:北京肿瘤医院的回顾性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 2;23(3):e26799. doi: 10.2196/26799.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of Mobile Devices to Measure Outcomes in Clinical Research, 2010-2016: A Systematic Literature Review.2010 - 2016年使用移动设备测量临床研究结果:一项系统文献综述
Digit Biomark. 2018 Jan 31;2(1):11-30. doi: 10.1159/000486347. eCollection 2018 Jan-Apr.
2
Selection of and Evidentiary Considerations for Wearable Devices and Their Measurements for Use in Regulatory Decision Making: Recommendations from the ePRO Consortium.可穿戴设备的选择和证据考虑因素及其在监管决策中的使用测量:ePRO 联盟的建议。
Value Health. 2018 Jun;21(6):631-639. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.09.012. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
3
Relationship between Clinic and Ambulatory Blood-Pressure Measurements and Mortality.诊室血压测量和动态血压测量与死亡率的关系。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 19;378(16):1509-1520. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1712231.
4
Wearable Devices in Clinical Trials: Hype and Hypothesis.可穿戴设备在临床试验中的应用:炒作与假设。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Jul;104(1):42-52. doi: 10.1002/cpt.966. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
5
Mobile health: the power of wearables, sensors, and apps to transform clinical trials.移动健康:可穿戴设备、传感器及应用程序改变临床试验的力量。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016 Jul;1375(1):3-18. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13117. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
6
How to regress and predict in a Bland-Altman plot? Review and contribution based on tolerance intervals and correlated-errors-in-variables models.如何在布兰德-奥特曼图中进行回归和预测?基于容忍区间和变量相关误差模型的综述与贡献。
Stat Med. 2016 Jun 30;35(14):2328-58. doi: 10.1002/sim.6872. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
7
Reproducibility and validity of a handheld spirometer.手持式肺活量计的可重复性和有效性
Respir Care. 2008 Apr;53(4):433-41.
8
Comparison of point-of-care and laboratory glucose analysis in critically ill patients.危重症患者即时检测与实验室血糖分析的比较。
Am J Crit Care. 2007 Jul;16(4):336-46; quiz 347.
9
Mixed models for assessing correlation in the presence of replication.用于在存在重复数据时评估相关性的混合模型。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2003 Apr;53(4):442-50. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2003.10466174.
10
Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol for validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults.欧洲高血压学会血压监测工作组:成人血压测量设备验证国际方案
Blood Press Monit. 2002 Feb;7(1):3-17. doi: 10.1097/00126097-200202000-00002.