• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者在临床试验中使用移动技术的偏好。

Patient preferences for using mobile technologies in clinical trials.

作者信息

Perry Brian, Geoghegan Cindy, Lin Li, McGuire F Hunter, Nido Virginia, Grabert Brigid, Morin Steve L, Hallinan Zachary P, Corneli Amy

机构信息

Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative, Durham, NC, USA.

Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Jun 20;15:100399. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100399. eCollection 2019 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100399
PMID:31312746
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6610628/
Abstract

The use of mobile technologies to collect participant data in clinical trials offers a number of scientific and logistical advantages. However, little is known about potential research participant preferences about how to incorporate mobile technologies into the design and conduct of a trial. Using a web-based survey which described hypothetical mobile clinical trial and traditional clinical trial scenarios, we explored patients' perceptions of and willingness to participate in mobile and traditional clinical trials, their preferred trial procedures related to the use of mobile technologies, and the preferred attributes of mobile technologies. The majority of survey respondents reported that they would prefer participating in a clinical trial that used mobile technology than a traditional trial that relied on standard in-clinic assessments. They expressed that mobile clinical trials offered greater convenience, a reduction of in-person clinic visits, and greater data collection accuracy. Respondents also reported preferences for the frequency of in-clinic visits during mobile clinical trials, device training and troubleshooting, data privacy and confidentiality, the location of data storage, and user access to data collected by the trial device. As research participants become more involved in capturing their own data to inform trial endpoints, their user-preferences of mobile technology, such as those described here, should be considered in the design and conduct of mobile clinical trials.

摘要

在临床试验中使用移动技术收集参与者数据具有诸多科学和后勤方面的优势。然而,对于如何将移动技术纳入试验设计和实施,潜在研究参与者的偏好却知之甚少。我们通过一项基于网络的调查,描述了假设的移动临床试验和传统临床试验场景,探讨了患者对参与移动和传统临床试验的看法与意愿、他们与移动技术使用相关的首选试验程序,以及移动技术的首选属性。大多数调查受访者表示,比起依赖标准门诊评估的传统试验,他们更愿意参与使用移动技术的临床试验。他们表示,移动临床试验提供了更大的便利、减少了门诊就诊次数,并且数据收集准确性更高。受访者还报告了在移动临床试验期间对门诊就诊频率、设备培训与故障排除、数据隐私和保密性、数据存储位置以及用户对试验设备收集的数据的访问权限的偏好。随着研究参与者更多地参与收集自身数据以确定试验终点,在移动临床试验的设计和实施中应考虑他们对移动技术的用户偏好,如此处所述。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60cd/6610628/8054fc3e49b1/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60cd/6610628/8054fc3e49b1/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60cd/6610628/8054fc3e49b1/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient preferences for using mobile technologies in clinical trials.患者在临床试验中使用移动技术的偏好。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Jun 20;15:100399. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100399. eCollection 2019 Sep.
2
Investigator Experiences Using Mobile Technologies in Clinical Research: Qualitative Descriptive Study.研究者在临床研究中使用移动技术的体验:定性描述性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Feb 12;9(2):e19242. doi: 10.2196/19242.
3
Privacy, Trust, and Data Sharing in Web-Based and Mobile Research: Participant Perspectives in a Large Nationwide Sample of Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States.基于网络和移动设备的研究中的隐私、信任与数据共享:美国全国范围内大量男男性行为者样本中的参与者观点
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 4;20(7):e233. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9019.
4
Internet trials: participant experiences and perspectives.网络试验:参与者的体验和看法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Oct 23;12:162. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-162.
5
Key Drivers and Facilitators of the Choice to Use mHealth Technology in People With Neurological Conditions: Observational Study.神经系统疾病患者选择使用移动健康技术的关键驱动因素和促进因素:观察性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 May 23;6(5):e29509. doi: 10.2196/29509.
6
Enabling Access to Medical and Health Education in Rwanda Using Mobile Technology: Needs Assessment for the Development of Mobile Medical Educator Apps.利用移动技术在卢旺达实现医学与健康教育的普及:移动医学教育应用程序开发的需求评估
JMIR Med Educ. 2016 Jun 1;2(1):e7. doi: 10.2196/mededu.5336.
7
A Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility of Collecting and Transmitting Clinical Trial Data with Mobile Technologies.一项评估利用移动技术收集和传输临床试验数据可行性的试点研究。
Digit Biomark. 2018 Nov 7;2(3):126-138. doi: 10.1159/000493883. eCollection 2018 Sep-Dec.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
mHealth Interventions to Support Prescription Opioid Tapering in Patients With Chronic Pain: Qualitative Study of Patients' Perspectives.支持慢性疼痛患者逐渐减少阿片类药物处方的移动健康干预措施:患者观点的定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 May 18;5(5):e25969. doi: 10.2196/25969.
10
Patients' Perspectives on Transforming Clinical Trial Participation: Large Online Vignette-based Survey.患者对临床试验参与方式转变的看法:基于大型在线情景模拟的调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 1;24(2):e29691. doi: 10.2196/29691.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of a digital reporting and supporting tool in breast cancer prevention trials (KarmApp).乳腺癌预防试验中一种数字报告与支持工具(KarmApp)的评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 6;25(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12471-9.
2
Preferences and Attitudes Towards Digital Communication and Symptom Reporting Methods in Clinical Trials.临床试验中对数字通信及症状报告方法的偏好与态度
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Jan 30;19:255-263. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S474535. eCollection 2025.
3
What motivates people with type 2 diabetes mellitus to participate in clinical trials from home?

本文引用的文献

1
Use of Mobile Devices to Measure Outcomes in Clinical Research, 2010-2016: A Systematic Literature Review.2010 - 2016年使用移动设备测量临床研究结果:一项系统文献综述
Digit Biomark. 2018 Jan 31;2(1):11-30. doi: 10.1159/000486347. eCollection 2018 Jan-Apr.
2
Assessing the Financial Value of Patient Engagement: A Quantitative Approach from CTTI's Patient Groups and Clinical Trials Project.评估患者参与的财务价值:来自CTTI患者群体与临床试验项目的定量方法。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018 Mar;52(2):220-229. doi: 10.1177/2168479017716715. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
3
The Rules of Engagement: CTTI Recommendations for Successful Collaborations Between Sponsors and Patient Groups Around Clinical Trials.
是什么促使 2 型糖尿病患者愿意参与家庭临床试验?
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Nov;17(11):e70070. doi: 10.1111/cts.70070.
4
mHealth-Based Self-Management Program for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Study.基于移动医疗的类风湿关节炎患者自我管理方案:一项初步的随机对照研究。
Nurs Health Sci. 2024 Dec;26(4):e13187. doi: 10.1111/nhs.13187.
5
Real time monitoring of respiratory viral infections in cohort studies using a smartphone app.使用智能手机应用程序在队列研究中对呼吸道病毒感染进行实时监测。
iScience. 2024 Sep 17;27(10):110912. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110912. eCollection 2024 Oct 18.
6
Describing the content of trial recruitment interventions using the TIDieR reporting checklist: a systematic methodology review.使用 TIDieR 报告清单描述试验招募干预措施的内容:系统方法学综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Apr 8;24(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02195-5.
7
Experiences of individuals with rheumatoid arthritis interacting with health care and the use of a digital self-care application: a qualitative interview study.类风湿关节炎患者与医疗保健互动以及使用数字自我护理应用程序的体验:一项定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 20;13(12):e072274. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072274.
8
How Much Evidence Is Enough? Research Sponsor Experiences Seeking Regulatory Acceptance of Digital Health Technology-Derived Endpoints.多少证据才足够?研究资助者寻求监管机构接受数字健康技术衍生终点的经历。
Digit Biomark. 2023 Jun 8;7(1):45-53. doi: 10.1159/000529878. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
9
Applying Systems Thinking to Inform Decentralized Clinical Trial Planning and Deployment.应用系统思维指导去中心化临床试验规划和部署。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 Sep;57(5):1081-1098. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00540-2. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
10
Mobile Apps for Dietary and Food Timing Assessment: Evaluation for Use in Clinical Research.用于饮食和进食时间评估的移动应用程序:临床研究中的应用评估
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Jun 16;7:e35858. doi: 10.2196/35858.
参与规则:CTTI 关于申办方与患者群体围绕临床试验开展成功合作的建议
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018 Mar;52(2):206-213. doi: 10.1177/2168479017720247. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
4
Usability of a Novel Mobile Health iPad App by Vulnerable Populations.弱势群体对一款新型移动健康iPad应用程序的可用性
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Apr 11;5(4):e43. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7268.
5
Acceptance, Usability and Health Applications of Virtual Worlds by Older Adults: A Feasibility Study.老年人对虚拟世界的接受度、可用性及健康应用:一项可行性研究。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Jun 2;5(2):e81. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5423.
6
Mobile Health Apps to Facilitate Self-Care: A Qualitative Study of User Experiences.促进自我护理的移动健康应用程序:用户体验的定性研究
PLoS One. 2016 May 23;11(5):e0156164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156164. eCollection 2016.
7
Acceptance of Commercially Available Wearable Activity Trackers Among Adults Aged Over 50 and With Chronic Illness: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation.50 岁及以上患有慢性病的成年人对市售可穿戴活动追踪器的接受度:一项混合方法评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Jan 27;4(1):e7. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4225.
8
Patient Engagement Practices in Clinical Research among Patient Groups, Industry, and Academia in the United States: A Survey.美国患者群体、行业和学术界临床研究中的患者参与实践:一项调查
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 14;10(10):e0140232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140232. eCollection 2015.
9
Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in the PCORI Pilot Projects: Description and Lessons Learned.患者及利益相关者参与患者为中心的结果研究所试点项目:描述与经验教训
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jan;31(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3450-z. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
10
A systematic review of approaches for engaging patients for research on rare diseases.关于让患者参与罕见病研究的方法的系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Aug;29 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S788-800. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2895-9.