Suppr超能文献

破伤风和白喉的发病率与成人免疫接种计划的关系。

Incidence of Tetanus and Diphtheria in Relation to Adult Vaccination Schedules.

机构信息

Division of Neuroscience, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, Oregon, USA.

Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Core, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Biostatistics Shared Resource, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jan 27;72(2):285-292. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization (WHO) does not recommend routine adult booster vaccination for tetanus and diphtheria after completion of the childhood vaccination series. However, many countries continue to implement adult booster vaccinations, leading to the question of whether this is necessary to reduce the incidence of these 2 rare diseases.

METHODS

We conducted an observational cohort study based on WHO case reports from 2001 through 2016. We compared the incidence of tetanus and diphtheria in 31 North American and European countries that either do or do not recommend adult booster vaccination.

RESULTS

Countries that vaccinate adults every 5-20 years (group 1) were compared with countries that do not routinely vaccinate adults for tetanus or diphtheria (group 2). Comparison of group 1 vs group 2 revealed no significant decline in tetanus incidence rates among countries that vaccinate adults (P = .52; risk ratio [RR] = 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], .36 to 1.70). The risk of contracting diphtheria was increased among countries that vaccinate adults due to inclusion of Latvia, a country that had poor vaccination coverage (P < .001). However, if Latvia is excluded, there is no difference in diphtheria incidence between countries that do or do not routinely vaccinate adults (P = .26; RR = 2.46; 95% CI, .54 to 11.23).

CONCLUSIONS

Review of >11 billion person-years of incidence data revealed no benefit associated with performing adult booster vaccinations against tetanus or diphtheria. Similar to other vaccines, this analysis supports the WHO position on adult booster vaccination and, if approved by governing health authorities, this may allow more countries to focus healthcare resources on vulnerable and undervaccinated populations.

摘要

背景

世界卫生组织(WHO)不建议在完成儿童疫苗接种系列后对破伤风和白喉进行常规成人加强免疫接种。然而,许多国家仍继续实施成人加强免疫接种,这引发了一个问题,即是否有必要减少这两种罕见疾病的发病率。

方法

我们基于 2001 年至 2016 年期间 WHO 的病例报告进行了一项观察性队列研究。我们比较了 31 个北美和欧洲国家的破伤风和白喉发病率,这些国家要么推荐成人加强免疫接种,要么不推荐。

结果

每 5-20 年对成人进行疫苗接种的国家(第 1 组)与不常规对成人进行破伤风或白喉疫苗接种的国家(第 2 组)进行了比较。第 1 组与第 2 组的比较显示,对成人进行疫苗接种的国家破伤风发病率没有显著下降(P=.52;风险比 [RR] = 0.78;95%置信区间 [CI],.36 至 1.70)。由于包括疫苗接种覆盖率较差的拉脱维亚在内,对成人进行疫苗接种的国家白喉发病风险增加(P<.001)。然而,如果排除拉脱维亚,那么不常规对成人进行疫苗接种的国家与常规接种的国家之间的白喉发病率没有差异(P=.26;RR = 2.46;95% CI,.54 至 11.23)。

结论

对超过 110 亿人年的发病率数据进行审查后,未发现与破伤风或白喉进行成人加强免疫接种相关的益处。与其他疫苗类似,这项分析支持了 WHO 对成人加强免疫接种的立场,如果得到管理卫生当局的批准,这可能使更多国家能够将医疗保健资源集中在脆弱和未充分接种疫苗的人群上。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
Herd immunity, vaccination and moral obligation.群体免疫、疫苗接种和道德义务。
J Med Ethics. 2023 Sep;49(9):636-641. doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108485. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
7
Cardiac arrest associated with non-toxigenic strain: A case report.与非产毒株相关的心脏骤停:一例报告。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 9;9:1003193. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1003193. eCollection 2022.
10
Active Circulation of Corynebacterium ulcerans among Nonhuman Primates.豚鼠气单胞菌在非人灵长类动物中的活跃循环。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Aug 31;10(4):e0089422. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00894-22. Epub 2022 Jul 12.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验