Department of Epidemiology and Clinical Microbiology, National Medicines Institute, Chełmska 30/34, 00-725, Warsaw, Poland.
Eumedica S.A., Chemin de Nauwelette 1, 7170, Manage, Belgium.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;39(6):1185-1191. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-03844-5. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
We evaluated the in vitro effectiveness of temocillin and several commonly used antimicrobials against Enterobacterales bacteria in isolates from Polish patients. We tested 400 isolates: 260 extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)- and/or ampC β-lactamase (AmpC)-producing isolates; 40 Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing isolates; and 100 ESBL-, AmpC-, and KPC-negative isolates. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of temocillin and 16 other antimicrobials were determined by reference microdilution. We also determined the activities of fosfomycin and ceftazidime/avibactam in KPC-producing isolates. The antibiotic sensitivities were interpreted according to EUCAST, BSAC, and CLSI criteria. Overall, 91% of the isolates were susceptible to temocillin using the urinary tract infection breakpoint (≤ 32 mg/L), and 61.8% were susceptible using the systemic infection breakpoint (≤ 8 mg/L). Meropenem and imipenem were the most active drugs (MIC values of 0.06 and 0.5 mg/L, respectively). Colistin and ertapenem (both MIC = 0.12 mg/L) were less active than meropenem or imipenem, but some strains were 77% susceptible to each of them. Among the KPC-producing isolates, 42.5% had MIC values of ≤ 32 mg/L (urinary tract infection breakpoint), but 100% were resistant to temocillin (systemic infection breakpoint). Ceftazidime/avibactam was active against 100% of the KPC-producing isolates, and fosfomycin was active against 40%. The empirical susceptibility rate observed among the urinary isolates suggests that temocillin may be considered as an alternative to carbapenems in the absence of KPC-producing bacteria. With regard to isolates from other sources, temocillin might be useful as a documented therapy agent or an empirical treatment in hospitals with a low prevalence of ESBL/AmpC-producing strains.
我们评估了替莫西林和几种常用抗菌药物对波兰患者分离的肠杆菌科细菌的体外疗效。我们共检测了 400 株分离株:260 株产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)和/或头孢菌素酶(AmpC)β-内酰胺酶的分离株;40 株产肺炎克雷伯菌碳青霉烯酶(KPC)的分离株;100 株 ESBL、AmpC 和 KPC 阴性分离株。采用微量肉汤稀释法测定替莫西林和 16 种其他抗菌药物的最小抑菌浓度(MIC)。我们还测定了产 KPC 分离株中磷霉素和头孢他啶/阿维巴坦的活性。根据 EUCAST、BSAC 和 CLSI 标准判断抗生素敏感性。总的来说,91%的分离株对尿路感染折点(≤32mg/L)的替莫西林敏感,61.8%对全身感染折点(≤8mg/L)的替莫西林敏感。美罗培南和亚胺培南是最有效的药物(MIC 值分别为 0.06 和 0.5mg/L)。多粘菌素和厄他培南(MIC 均为 0.12mg/L)的活性不如美罗培南或亚胺培南,但部分菌株对两者的敏感性均为 77%。在产 KPC 的分离株中,42.5%的 MIC 值≤32mg/L(尿路感染折点),但 100%对替莫西林耐药(全身感染折点)。头孢他啶/阿维巴坦对所有产 KPC 的分离株均有效,而磷霉素对 40%的分离株有效。尿分离株的经验性药敏率表明,在没有产 KPC 细菌的情况下,替莫西林可能被视为碳青霉烯类药物的替代品。对于其他来源的分离株,替莫西林可能作为有记录的治疗药物或在产 ESBL/AmpC 菌株流行率低的医院中作为经验性治疗药物使用。