Suppr超能文献

评估不同模式下土地整治项目的绩效:以中国湖北省江汉平原为例。

Assessing the Performance of Land Consolidation Projects in Different Modes: A Case Study in Jianghan Plain of Hubei Province, China.

机构信息

Department of Land Resource Management, School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), 388 Lumo Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan 430074, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 21;17(4):1410. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041410.

Abstract

Land consolidation is essential in China for improving land use efficiency and supporting rural public space governance. Previously, the implementation of land consolidation projects (LCPs) had been mainly led by governments in China. In recent years, the Chinese government vigorously promoted land consolidation, and land consolidation in the corporation-leading mode (CLM) has emerged. This study focused on investigating the performance of CLM projects and the difference in performance levels between the CLM projects and the government-leading mode (GLM) projects. Based on the improved extensible matter-element model, the performance levels of 14 LCPs in GLM and CLM of Jianghan Plain, Hubei Province and related impact factors were analyzed. A set of evaluation indices was selected based on the "process-based thinking and logic". Results showed that: (1) performance levels of the 14 LCPs are different, most of the projects in the GLM have ordinary or poor performance, while most of the projects in the CLM have excellent or good performance; (2) factors affecting the performance levels of LCPs are also different in the two modes. The main influencing factors in the CLM were the poor access to field roads, insufficient shelterbelt planting, and low land reclamation efficiency, while the insufficient shelterbelt planting, low annual output value of farmland and grain production capacity, low increase rate of agricultural labor production, and low land reclamation efficiency were the main influencing factors in the GLM; (3) comparative analysis of the two modes revealed that LCPs in the CLM have clear investment directions, high output benefits, and obvious advantages in the development of modern agriculture when compared with the GLM. To achieve improving the performance levels of LCPs, policy makers should actively innovate the implementation mode of LCPs and encourage all kinds of agricultural corporations to participate in land consolidation.

摘要

土地整治在中国对于提高土地利用效率和支持农村公共空间治理至关重要。此前,中国的土地整治项目(LCPs)主要由政府主导。近年来,中国政府大力推进土地整治,出现了企业主导模式(CLM)的土地整治项目。本研究重点调查了 CLM 项目的绩效以及 CLM 项目与政府主导模式(GLM)项目之间的绩效水平差异。基于改进的可拓物元模型,分析了湖北省江汉平原 14 个 GLM 和 CLM 土地整治项目的绩效水平及其相关影响因素。根据“基于过程的思维和逻辑”,选择了一套评价指标。结果表明:(1)14 个 LCPs 的绩效水平不同,GLM 项目大部分绩效水平一般或较差,而 CLM 项目大部分绩效水平优秀或良好;(2)两种模式下影响 LCPs 绩效水平的因素也不同。CLM 的主要影响因素是田间道路接入较差、防护林种植不足、土地复垦效率低,而 GLM 的主要影响因素是防护林种植不足、耕地年产值和粮食产能低、农业劳动力生产率增长率低、土地复垦效率低;(3)两种模式的对比分析表明,CLM 的土地整治项目投资方向明确,产出效益高,在发展现代农业方面明显优于 GLM。为了提高 LCPs 的绩效水平,决策者应积极创新 LCPs 的实施模式,鼓励各类农业企业参与土地整治。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9edd/7068273/0d488c371384/ijerph-17-01410-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验