Kim Ik Yong
Department of Surgery, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.
Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Wonju, Korea.
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2020 Feb 25;75(2):79-85. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2020.75.2.79.
The presence of bowel contents during colorectal surgery has been related to surgical site infections (SSI), anastomotic leakage (AL) and postoperative complications theologically. Mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) for elective colorectal surgery aims to reduce fecal materials and bacterial count with the objective to decrease SSI rate, including AL. Based on many observational data, meta-analysis and multicenter randomized control trials (RTC), non-MBP did not increase AL rates or SSI and other complications in colon and even rectal surgery. In 2011 Cochrane review, there is no significant benefit MBP compared with non-MBP in colon surgery and also no better benefit MBP compared with rectal enemas in rectal surgery. However, in surgeon's perspectives, MBP is still in widespread surgical practice, despite the discomfort caused in patients, and general targeting of the colon microflora with antibiotics continues to gain popularity despite the lack of understanding of the role of the microbiome in anastomotic healing. Recently, there are many evidence suggesting that MBP+oral antibiotics (OA) should be the growing gold standard for colorectal surgery. However, there are rare RCT studies and still no solid evidences in OA preparation, so further studies need results in both MBP and OA and only OA for colorectal surgery. Also, MBP studies in patients with having minimally invasive surgery (MIS; laparoscopic or robotics) colorectal surgery are still warranted. Further RCT on patients having elective left side colon and rectal surgery with primary anastomosis in whom sphincter saving surgery without MBP in these MIS and microbiome era.
结直肠手术中肠内容物的存在从理论上讲与手术部位感染(SSI)、吻合口漏(AL)及术后并发症相关。择期结直肠手术的机械性肠道准备(MBP)旨在减少粪便物质及细菌数量,以降低包括AL在内的SSI发生率。基于众多观察性数据、荟萃分析及多中心随机对照试验(RCT),在结肠甚至直肠手术中,不进行MBP并未增加AL发生率、SSI及其他并发症。在2011年Cochrane综述中,结肠手术中MBP与不进行MBP相比无显著益处,直肠手术中MBP与直肠灌肠相比也无更好益处。然而,从外科医生的角度来看,尽管会给患者带来不适,MBP仍在广泛应用于外科手术中,而且尽管对微生物群在吻合口愈合中的作用缺乏了解,但用抗生素对结肠微生物群进行一般性靶向治疗仍越来越受欢迎。最近,有许多证据表明MBP加口服抗生素(OA)应成为结直肠手术日益公认的金标准。然而,关于OA准备的RCT研究很少,且在OA准备方面仍没有确凿证据,因此需要进一步研究MBP和OA以及仅使用OA进行结直肠手术的效果。此外,在接受微创(MIS;腹腔镜或机器人)结直肠手术的患者中进行MBP研究仍很有必要。在这些MIS和微生物群时代,对接受择期左侧结肠和直肠手术并进行一期吻合且保留括约肌手术且不进行MBP的患者进行进一步的RCT研究。