选择与觅食：可达性对可接受性的影响。
Choice and foraging: the effects of accessibility on acceptability.
作者信息
Fantino E, Preston R A
机构信息
Department of Psychology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0109.
出版信息
J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Nov;50(3):395-403. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-395.
Abstract
Pigeons responded in a successive-encounters choice procedure in which accessibility of the less profitable of two outcomes varied either in terms of probability of encounter or search time to encounter (keeping search time to the more profitable outcome constant). When the less profitable outcome was made more probable its acceptance became more likely. However, when search time to encounter the less profitable outcome was shortened, its acceptance became less likely. Both results are consistent with the delay-reduction hypothesis and with an optimality model developed for application to the successive-encounters choice procedure.
摘要
鸽子在连续遭遇选择程序中做出反应，在该程序中，两个结果中较不有利可图的结果的可及性在遭遇概率或遭遇搜索时间方面有所不同（使获得更有利可图结果的搜索时间保持不变）。当较不有利可图的结果更有可能出现时，接受它的可能性就更大。然而，当遇到较不有利可图结果的搜索时间缩短时，接受它的可能性就更小。这两个结果都与延迟减少假说以及为应用于连续遭遇选择程序而开发的最优模型一致。
相似文献
1
Choice and foraging: the effects of accessibility on acceptability.选择与觅食：可达性对可接受性的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Nov;50(3):395-403. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-395.
2
Differences, not ratios, control choice in an experimental analogue to foraging.在觅食的实验模拟中，是差异而非比率控制着选择。
Psychol Sci. 2000 May;11(3):229-33. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00246.
3
How pigeons estimate rates of prey encounter.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1992 Jul;18(3):219-35.
4
Choice behavior in spontaneously hypertensive rats: variable vs. fixed schedules of reinforcement.
Behav Processes. 2010 May;84(1):465-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.12.018. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
5
When good pigeons make bad decisions: Choice with probabilistic delays and outcomes.当优秀的鸽子做出错误决策时：具有概率性延迟和结果的选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Nov;104(3):241-51. doi: 10.1002/jeab.177.
6
Rapid acquisition of choice and timing in pigeons.鸽子对选择和时机的快速习得。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2007 Oct;33(4):392-408. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.33.4.392.
7
Choice between reliable and unreliable outcomes: mixed percentage-reinforcement in concurrent chains.在可靠和不可靠结果之间进行选择：并发链中的混合百分比强化
J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Jan;47(1):57-72. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-57.
8
Suboptimal choice behavior by pigeons.鸽子的次优选择行为。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Jun;17(3):412-6. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.3.412.
9
Effects of different accessibility of reinforcement schedules on choice in humans.不同强化时间表可及性对人类选择的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Sep;62(2):269-92. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-269.
10
Conditioned reinforcement value and choice.条件强化值与选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Mar;55(2):155-75. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-155.
引用本文的文献
1
Expanding the Scope: Beyond the Familiar and Beyond the Page.拓展范围：超越熟悉的领域，超越纸面。
Behav Anal. 2016 Oct 7;39(2):189-196. doi: 10.1007/s40614-016-0078-1. eCollection 2016 Oct.
2
Choice, conditioned reinforcement, and the prius effect.选择、条件性强化与普锐斯效应。
Behav Anal. 2008 Fall;31(2):95-111. doi: 10.1007/BF03392164.
3
Effects of reinforcer delay and variability in a successive-encounters procedure.连续接触程序中强化物延迟和变异性的影响。
Learn Behav. 2008 Nov;36(4):301-10. doi: 10.3758/LB.36.4.301.
4
Choice in a successive-encounters procedure and hyperbolic decay of reinforcement.连续接触程序中的选择与强化的双曲线衰减
J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 Jul;88(1):73-85. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2007.87-06.
5
Response-dependent prechoice effects on foraging-related choice.响应依赖的预选择效应对觅食相关选择的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 May;65(3):619-41. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-619.
6
Effects of different accessibility of reinforcement schedules on choice in humans.不同强化时间表可及性对人类选择的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Sep;62(2):269-92. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-269.
7
Delay reduction: current status.减少延迟：当前状况
J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jul;60(1):159-69. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-159.
8
Delay reduction and optimal foraging: variable-ratio search in a foraging analogue.减少延迟与最优觅食：觅食模拟中的可变比率搜索
J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 May;61(3):465-77. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-465.
9
The effects of component duration on multiple-schedule performance in closed and open economies.组成部分持续时间对封闭和开放经济体中多重计划绩效的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Nov;50(3):457-68. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-457.
10
Quinine pellets as an inferior good and a Giffen good in rats.奎宁颗粒剂在大鼠中作为劣等品和吉芬商品的情况。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Mar;53(2):263-71. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-263.
本文引用的文献
1
Performance in continuously available multiple schedules.连续可得多项任务表现。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Nov;44(3):343-53. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-343.
2
Choice: A local analysis.选择：局部分析。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 May;43(3):383-405. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-383.
3
Behavioral economics.行为经济学。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Nov;42(3):435-52. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-435.
4
Human observing: Maintained by stimuli correlated with reinforcement but not extinction.人类观察：由与强化相关但与消退无关的刺激维持。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Sep;40(2):193-210. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-193.
5
Incentive theory: II. Models for choice.激励理论：二、选择模型。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Sep;38(2):217-32. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-217.
6
Choice and foraging.选择与觅食。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Sep;38(2):117-23. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-117.
7
Choice behavior of rats in a concurrent-chains schedule: Amount and delay of reinforcement.大鼠在同时链安排中的选择行为：强化物的数量和延迟。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 May;37(3):383-92. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-383.
8
The delay-reduction hypothesis of conditioned reinforcement and punishment: Observing behavior.条件强化和惩罚的延迟减少假说：观察行为。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Jan;35(1):93-108. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.35-93.
9
Choice and rate of reinforcement.强化的选择和比率。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Sep;12(5):723-30. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-723.
10
Influences of delay and rate of reinforcement on discrete-trial choice.延迟和强化率对离散试验选择的影响。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1985 Oct;11(4):565-75.
Zotero 插件