Suppr超能文献

提交用于临床化学分析的体液标本中干扰指数的综述。

Review of interference indices in body fluid specimens submitted for clinical chemistry analyses.

作者信息

Eigsti Renee L, Krasowski Matthew D, Vidholia Aditi, Merrill Anna E

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.

出版信息

Pract Lab Med. 2020 Feb 8;19:e00155. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2020.e00155. eCollection 2020 Mar.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to retrospectively investigate interference indices in a wide range of body fluid specimens and compare these indices to those found in serum/plasma.

DESIGN AND METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated interference indices for hemolysis, icterus, and lipemia in 2752 body fluid specimens submitted for clinical chemistry testing.

RESULTS

The distribution of interference indices for body fluid samples was generally similar to that of serum/plasma interference indices. Hemolysis of specimens submitted for lactate dehydrogenase (LD) represented the most common interference for body fluid chemistries. Body fluids collected from postsurgical drain sites had a higher proportion of tests exceeding both icterus and lipemic limits compared to serum/plasma specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, degrees of hemolysis, icterus, and lipemia observed in body fluid specimens were in large part similar to serum/plasma specimens, with a few notable differences. Body fluids exhibited a higher proportion of samples with severe icterus or lipemia. Severely lipemic body fluid samples were significantly less likely to also be hemolyzed relative to severely lipemic serum/plasma specimens. LD was the test most commonly affected by interference across all body fluid types. False elevations in pleural fluid LD induced by hemolysis can lead to mis-classification of transudative effusions as exudative using Light's criteria. The possible impact of interferences on clinical chemistry testing in body fluids is an important post-analytical consideration.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在回顾性调查多种体液标本中的干扰指数,并将这些指数与血清/血浆中的指数进行比较。

设计与方法

这项回顾性研究评估了提交进行临床化学检测的2752份体液标本中的溶血、黄疸和脂血干扰指数。

结果

体液样本的干扰指数分布总体上与血清/血浆干扰指数相似。提交检测乳酸脱氢酶(LD)的标本溶血是体液化学检测中最常见的干扰。与血清/血浆标本相比,从术后引流部位采集的体液中超过黄疸和脂血限度的检测比例更高。

结论

总体而言,体液标本中观察到的溶血、黄疸和脂血程度在很大程度上与血清/血浆标本相似,但也有一些显著差异。体液中出现严重黄疸或脂血的样本比例更高。与严重脂血的血清/血浆标本相比,严重脂血的体液样本同时发生溶血的可能性显著降低。LD是所有体液类型中最常受干扰影响的检测项目。溶血引起的胸腔积液LD假性升高可导致根据Light标准将漏出液误分类为渗出液。干扰对体液临床化学检测的潜在影响是分析后需要考虑的重要因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c361/7030980/bf8c9c032514/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验