Suppr超能文献

卧推练习 3 种变式中速度变量的幅度和可靠性的差异。

Differences in the magnitude and reliability of velocity variables collected during 3 variants of the bench press exercise.

机构信息

University of Belgrade, Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, The Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia.

Faculty of Health Science, Universidad Europea De Canarias, La Orotava, Spain.

出版信息

J Sports Sci. 2020 Apr;38(7):759-766. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1734299. Epub 2020 Feb 26.

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the reliability and magnitude of velocity variables between 3 variants of the bench press (BP) exercise in participants with and without BP training experience. Thirty males, 15 with and 15 without BP experience, randomly performed 3 variants of the BP on separate sessions: (I) concentric-only, (II) fast-eccentric and (III) controlled-eccentric. The mean velocity (MV) and maximum velocity (V) of the concentric phase were collected against 3 loads (≈30%1RM, 50%1RM, and 75%1RM) with a linear velocity transducer. Reliability was high regardless of the variable, BP variant, and load (coefficient of variation [CV] ≤ 4.47%, intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] ≥ 0.87). The comparison of the CVs suggested a higher reliability for the fast-eccentric BP (8 out of 12 comparisons), followed by the concentric-only BP (5 out of 12 comparisons), and finally the controlled-eccentric BP (never provided a higher reliability). No differences in reliability were observed between experienced (CV ≤ 4.71%; ICC ≥ 0.79) and non-experienced (CV ≤ 6.29%; ICC ≥ 0.76) participants. The fast-eccentric BP provided the highest MV ( < 0.05) and no differences were observed for V. These results support the assessment of movement velocity during the fast-eccentric BP even in participants without experience.

摘要

本研究旨在比较有和无卧推(BP)训练经验的参与者在 3 种 BP 变体中速度变量的可靠性和幅度。30 名男性,15 名有经验,15 名无经验,随机在 3 个不同的训练日进行 3 种 BP 变体:(I)仅向心,(II)快速离心和(III)控制离心。使用线性速度传感器收集 3 个负荷(≈30%1RM、50%1RM 和 75%1RM)下向心阶段的平均速度(MV)和最大速度(V)。无论变量、BP 变体和负荷如何,可靠性都很高(变异系数 [CV]≤4.47%,组内相关系数 [ICC]≥0.87)。比较 CV 表明,快速离心 BP 的可靠性更高(12 次比较中有 8 次),其次是仅向心 BP(12 次比较中有 5 次),最后是控制离心 BP(从未提供更高的可靠性)。有经验(CV≤4.71%;ICC≥0.79)和无经验(CV≤6.29%;ICC≥0.76)参与者之间的可靠性没有差异。快速离心 BP 提供了最高的 MV(<0.05),V 没有差异。这些结果支持在没有经验的参与者中评估快速离心 BP 期间的运动速度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验