Woods Hole Research Center, Falmouth, MA, USA.
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 May;26(5):3006-3014. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15050. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
The Global Carbon Project (GCP) has published global carbon budgets annually since 2007 (Canadell et al. [2007], Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 104, 18866-18870; Raupach et al. [2007], Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 104, 10288-10293). There are many scientists involved, but the terrestrial fluxes that appear in the budgets are not well understood by ecologists and biogeochemists outside of that community. The purpose of this paper is to make the terrestrial fluxes of carbon in those budgets more accessible to a broader community. The GCP budget is composed of annual perturbations from pre-industrial conditions, driven by addition of carbon to the system from combustion of fossil fuels and by transfers of carbon from land to the atmosphere as a result of land use. The budget includes a term for each of the major fluxes of carbon (fossil fuels, oceans, land) as well as the rate of carbon accumulation in the atmosphere. Land is represented by two terms: one resulting from direct anthropogenic effects (Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry or land management) and one resulting from indirect anthropogenic (e.g., CO , climate change) and natural effects. Each of these two net terrestrial fluxes of carbon, in turn, is composed of opposing gross emissions and removals (e.g., deforestation and forest regrowth). Although the GCP budgets have focused on the two net terrestrial fluxes, they have paid little attention to the gross components, which are important for a number of reasons, including understanding the potential for land management to remove CO from the atmosphere and understanding the processes responsible for the sink for carbon on land. In contrast to the net fluxes of carbon, which are constrained by the global carbon budget, the gross fluxes are largely unconstrained, suggesting that there is more uncertainty than commonly believed about how terrestrial carbon emissions will respond to future fossil fuel emissions and a changing climate.
自 2007 年以来,全球碳计划(GCP)每年都会发布全球碳预算(Canadell 等人,[2007],Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,104,18866-18870;Raupach 等人,[2007],Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,104,10288-10293)。有许多科学家参与其中,但生态学家和生物地球化学家并不太了解预算中出现的陆地通量。本文的目的是使更广泛的科学界更容易理解这些预算中的陆地碳通量。GCP 预算由工业化前条件的年度波动组成,这些波动是由化石燃料燃烧向系统中添加碳以及由于土地利用而将碳从陆地转移到大气中引起的。预算包括主要碳通量(化石燃料、海洋、陆地)的一个术语,以及大气中碳积累的速率。陆地由两个术语表示:一个是直接人为影响(土地利用、土地利用变化和林业或土地管理)的结果,另一个是间接人为(例如,CO2,气候变化)和自然影响的结果。这两个陆地碳的净通量,反过来,又由相反的总排放量和清除量组成(例如,森林砍伐和森林再生)。尽管 GCP 预算一直关注这两个陆地净通量,但它们很少关注总通量,这在许多方面都很重要,包括了解土地管理从大气中去除 CO2 的潜力以及了解陆地上碳汇的形成过程。与受全球碳预算约束的净碳通量相反,总通量在很大程度上不受约束,这表明人们对陆地碳排放量将如何应对未来化石燃料排放和气候变化的影响存在更多的不确定性,而不是普遍认为的那样。