Oper Dent. 2020 Sep 1;45(5):484-495. doi: 10.2341/19-153-L.
Conventional multistep resin cements presented higher adhesive performance to dentin than simplified self-adhesive cements, which is an important criterion for indirect restoration prognosis.
This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the literature on laboratory studies assessing bonding performance to dentin of conventional and self-adhesive resin cements, in cementing indirect restorations. This review was reported according to the PRISMA Statement. Of a total of 518 studies, 36 were screened full text and reviewed according to exclusion criteria. Nineteen papers were included in the systematic review and meta-analyses, according to the following inclusion criteria: studies that evaluated the bond strength to dentin of indirect restorations cemented with dual conventional or self-adhesive resin cements and those that presented bond strength data in MPa as an outcome. Statistical analyses were conducted using Rev-Man 5.1. Comparisons were performed with random effects models at 5% significance level. A global analysis comparing conventional and self-adhesive cements and three subgroup analyses comparing immediate and long-term results were performed. Global analysis showed a difference between groups, with conventional resin cements presenting higher bond strength results than self-adhesive resin cements, in immediate and long-term time periods (both p=0.03). Immediate and longterm bond strength results were different for self-adhesive cements, favoring immediate bond strength (p=0.03), but immediate and long-term bond strength results for conventional resin cements were not different (p=0.06). Medium or high risk of bias was found in all studies. Conventional multistep resin cements showed superior overall adhesive performance compared with simplified self-adhesive resin cements when used to cement indirect restorations to dentin.
传统多步树脂水门汀对牙本质的黏结性能优于简化自黏结水门汀,这是间接修复预后的一个重要标准。
本研究旨在对评估间接修复体黏结性能的常规自黏结树脂水门汀与传统多步树脂水门汀的实验室研究进行系统综述。本综述根据 PRISMA 声明进行报告。在总共 518 项研究中,有 36 项经过全文筛选,并根据排除标准进行了审查。根据以下纳入标准,有 19 篇论文被纳入系统综述和荟萃分析:评估用双固化传统或自黏结树脂水门汀黏结的间接修复体与牙本质黏结强度的研究,以及以 MPa 为结果呈现黏结强度数据的研究。使用 RevMan 5.1 进行统计分析。在 5%的显著性水平上进行随机效应模型比较。进行了常规和自黏结水门汀之间的总体分析,以及即时和长期结果的三个亚组分析。总体分析显示两组之间存在差异,传统树脂水门汀在即时和长期时间内的黏结强度结果均高于自黏结树脂水门汀(均 p=0.03)。自黏结水门汀即时和长期黏结强度结果不同,即时黏结强度更高(p=0.03),但传统树脂水门汀即时和长期黏结强度结果无差异(p=0.06)。所有研究均存在中度或高度偏倚风险。当用于将间接修复体黏结至牙本质时,传统多步树脂水门汀总体上显示出优于简化自黏结树脂水门汀的黏附性能。