Suppr超能文献

固化模式对自粘结树脂水门汀与牙本质粘结强度的影响。

Effect of curing mode on bond strength of self-adhesive resin luting cements to dentin.

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba School of Dentistry, Campinas State University, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010 Apr;93(1):122-7. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31566.

Abstract

In this study, the in vitro bond strength of dual-curing resin cements to indirect composite restorations when the cement was either light polymerized or allowed to only autopolymerize was evaluated. Occlusal dentin surfaces of 56 extracted human third molars were flattened to expose coronal dentin. Teeth were assigned to eight groups (n = 7) according to resin cement products and polymerization modes: conventional cement (Panavia F 2.0; Kuraray Medical) and self-adhesive cements [RelyX Unicem (3M ESPE), BisCem (Bisco), and G-Cem (GC Corp.)]. Cements were applied to prepolymerized resin discs (2-mm-thick Sinfony; 3M ESPE), which were subsequently bonded to the prepared dentin surfaces. The restored teeth were either light-polymerized through the overlying composite according to manufacturers' instructions or were allowed to only self-cure. After 24 h, the teeth and restorations were sectioned to obtain multiple bonded beams (1.0 mm(2)) and tested in tension at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min until failure. Data (MPa) were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey test (alpha = 0.05). Light activation of some cement systems (G-Cem and Panavia F 2.0) increased the bond strength, while the curing mode did not affect the bond strength for some (RelyX Unicem and BisCem). The bond strength in the autopolymerized mode varied among products. In general, the use of self-adhesive resin cements did not provide significantly higher bond strengths than that of a conventional material, and two self-adhesive cements yielded significantly lower bond values (regardless of cure mode) than the other products.

摘要

本研究评估了光固化和自固化两种模式下,双固化树脂水门汀与间接复合树脂修复体的体外粘结强度。将 56 颗人第三磨牙的咬合面牙本质磨平以暴露冠部牙本质。根据树脂水门汀产品和聚合模式将牙齿分为 8 组(n = 7):传统水门汀(Panavia F 2.0;Kuraray Medical)和自粘接水门汀[RelyX Unicem(3M ESPE)、BisCem(Bisco)和 G-Cem(GC Corp.)]。将水门汀应用于预聚合的树脂片(2 毫米厚的 Sinfony;3M ESPE),然后将其粘结到预备好的牙本质表面。修复后的牙齿根据制造商的说明通过覆盖的复合树脂进行光固化,或者仅允许自固化。24 小时后,将牙齿和修复体切割成多个粘结梁(1.0 毫米(2)),以 0.5 毫米/分钟的十字头速度进行拉伸测试,直至破坏。数据(MPa)采用双因素方差分析和 Tukey 检验(alpha = 0.05)进行分析。一些水门汀系统(G-Cem 和 Panavia F 2.0)的光激活增加了粘结强度,而固化模式对一些(RelyX Unicem 和 BisCem)的粘结强度没有影响。自固化模式下的粘结强度因产品而异。一般来说,自粘接树脂水门汀的粘结强度并不明显高于传统材料,两种自粘接水门汀的粘结强度(无论固化模式如何)均明显低于其他产品。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验