K.L. Rising is associate professor and director of acute care transitions, Department of Emergency Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. R.E. Powell is associate professor, Department of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and senior researcher, Mathematica, Princeton, New Jersey. K.A. Cameron is research professor, Department of Medical Education and Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. D.H. Salzman is associate professor, Department of Emergency Medicine and Department of Medical Education, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. D. Papanagnou is associate professor and vice chair for education, Department of Emergency Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. A.M.B. Doty is a research coordinator, Department of Emergency Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. L. Latimer is a research coordinator, Department of Emergency Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. K. Piserchia is a clinical research coordinator, Department of Emergency Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. W.C. McGaghie is professor, Department of Medical Education, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. D.M. McCarthy is associate professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Acad Med. 2020 Jul;95(7):1026-1034. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003231.
Clear communication with patients upon emergency department (ED) discharge is important for patient safety during the transition to outpatient care. Over one-third of patients are discharged from the ED with diagnostic uncertainty, yet there is no established approach for effective discharge communication in this scenario. From 2017 to 2019, the authors developed the Uncertainty Communication Checklist for use in simulation-based training and assessment of emergency physician communication skills when discharging patients with diagnostic uncertainty. This development process followed the established 12-step Checklist Development Checklist framework and integrated patient feedback into 6 of the 12 steps. Patient input was included as it has potential to improve patient-centeredness of checklists related to assessment of clinical performance. Focus group patient participants from 2 clinical sites were included: Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, and Northwestern University Hospital, Chicago, Illinois.The authors developed a preliminary instrument based on existing checklists, clinical experience, literature review, and input from an expert panel comprising health care professionals and patient advocates. They then refined the instrument based on feedback from 2 waves of patient focus groups, resulting in a final 21-item checklist. The checklist items assess if uncertainty was addressed in each step of the discharge communication, including the following major categories: introduction, test results/ED summary, no/uncertain diagnosis, next steps/follow-up, home care, reasons to return, and general communication skills. Patient input influenced both what items were included and the wording of items in the final checklist. This patient-centered, systematic approach to checklist development is built upon the rigor of the Checklist Development Checklist and provides an illustration of how to integrate patient feedback into the design of assessment tools when appropriate.
在向门诊护理过渡期间,与急诊科 (ED) 出院患者进行清晰的沟通对于患者安全至关重要。超过三分之一的患者在 ED 出院时存在诊断不确定性,但在这种情况下,尚无有效的出院沟通方法。作者从 2017 年到 2019 年开发了不确定性沟通清单,用于模拟培训和评估在 ED 出院时存在诊断不确定性的患者时的急诊医生沟通技巧。该开发过程遵循既定的 12 步清单开发清单框架,并将患者反馈纳入了 12 个步骤中的 6 个步骤。纳入患者的反馈是因为它有可能提高与评估临床绩效相关的以患者为中心的清单。参与的患者来自 2 个临床地点:宾夕法尼亚州费城的托马斯杰斐逊大学医院和伊利诺伊州芝加哥的西北大学医院。作者根据现有的清单、临床经验、文献综述以及由医疗保健专业人员和患者权益倡导者组成的专家小组的输入,开发了一个初步的工具。然后,他们根据来自 2 波患者焦点小组的反馈对该工具进行了改进,最终形成了一个包含 21 个项目的清单。该清单评估了在出院沟通的每个步骤中是否解决了不确定性,包括以下主要类别:介绍、检查结果/ED 摘要、无/不确定诊断、后续步骤/随访、家庭护理、返回原因和一般沟通技巧。患者的反馈既影响了清单中包含的项目,也影响了最终清单中项目的措辞。这种以患者为中心的、系统的清单开发方法建立在清单开发清单的严谨性基础之上,并提供了一个如何在适当的时候将患者反馈纳入评估工具设计的示例。