UMR BGPI, INRAE, CIRAD, Montpellier SupAgro, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Julius Kühn Institut, Braunschweig, Germany.
J Virol. 2020 Apr 16;94(9). doi: 10.1128/JVI.01998-19.
Vector transmission plays a primary role in the life cycle of viruses, and insects are the most common vectors. An important mode of vector transmission, reported only for plant viruses, is circulative nonpropagative transmission whereby the virus cycles within the body of its insect vector, from gut to salivary glands and saliva, without replicating. This mode of transmission has been extensively studied in the viral families and and is also reported for The biology of viruses within these three families is different, and whether the viruses have evolved similar molecular/cellular virus-vector interactions is unclear. In particular, nanoviruses have a multipartite genome organization, and how the distinct genome segments encapsidated individually transit through the insect body is unknown. Here, using a combination of fluorescent hybridization and immunofluorescence, we monitor distinct proteins and genome segments of the nanovirus (FBNSV) during transcytosis through the gut and salivary gland cells of its aphid vector FBNSV specifically transits through cells of the anterior midgut and principal salivary gland cells, a route similar to that of geminiviruses but distinct from that of luteoviruses. Our results further demonstrate that a large number of virus particles enter every single susceptible cell so that distinct genome segments always remain together. Finally, we confirm that the success of nanovirus-vector interaction depends on a nonstructural helper component, the viral protein nuclear shuttle protein (NSP), which is shown to be mandatory for viral accumulation within gut cells. An intriguing mode of vector transmission described only for plant viruses is circulative nonpropagative transmission, whereby the virus passes through the gut and salivary glands of the insect vector without replicating. Three plant virus families are transmitted this way, but details of the molecular/cellular mechanisms of the virus-vector interaction are missing. This is striking for nanoviruses that are believed to interact with aphid vectors in ways similar to those of luteoviruses or geminiviruses but for which empirical evidence is scarce. We here confirm that nanoviruses follow a within-vector route similar to that of geminiviruses but distinct from that of luteoviruses. We show that they produce a nonstructural protein mandatory for viral entry into gut cells, a unique phenomenon for this mode of transmission. Finally, noting that nanoviruses are multipartite viruses, we demonstrate that a large number of viral particles penetrate susceptible cells of the vector, allowing distinct genome segments to remain together.
病毒的生命周期中,载体传播起着主要作用,而昆虫是最常见的载体。一种重要的载体传播方式,仅在植物病毒中报道,是循环非增殖性传播,其中病毒在其昆虫载体的体内循环,从肠道到唾液腺和唾液,而不复制。这种传播方式在病毒科和中得到了广泛研究,也有报道称对于也有报道。这三个科的病毒生物学是不同的,病毒是否进化出类似的分子/细胞病毒-载体相互作用尚不清楚。特别是,细小病毒具有多组分基因组组织,并且单独包封的不同基因组片段如何穿过昆虫体尚不清楚。在这里,我们使用荧光杂交和免疫荧光的组合,监测纳米病毒(FBNSV)在其蚜虫载体(FBNSV)的肠道和唾液腺细胞中的不同蛋白质和基因组片段在穿越过程中的情况。FBNSV 特异性地穿过前中肠和主唾液腺细胞,这一途径类似于双生病毒,但与黄症病毒不同。我们的结果进一步表明,大量的病毒颗粒进入每一个易感细胞,因此不同的基因组片段总是在一起。最后,我们证实,纳米病毒-载体相互作用的成功取决于一种非结构辅助成分,即病毒核穿梭蛋白(NSP),它被证明是病毒在肠道细胞中积累所必需的。一种仅在植物病毒中描述的有趣的载体传播方式是循环非增殖性传播,其中病毒在昆虫载体的肠道和唾液腺中通过而不复制。有三种植物病毒科以这种方式传播,但病毒-载体相互作用的分子/细胞机制的细节尚不清楚。这对于纳米病毒来说是引人注目的,因为人们认为它们与蚜虫载体的相互作用方式类似于黄症病毒或双生病毒,但缺乏经验证据。我们在这里证实,纳米病毒遵循与双生病毒相似但与黄症病毒不同的载体途径。我们表明,它们产生一种非结构蛋白,对于病毒进入肠道细胞是必需的,这是这种传播方式的一个独特现象。最后,注意到纳米病毒是多组分病毒,我们证明大量的病毒颗粒穿透载体的易感细胞,使不同的基因组片段保持在一起。