Department of Methodology and Statistics, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Department of Methodology and Statistics, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Utrecht University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Res Synth Methods. 2020 May;11(3):413-425. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1403. Epub 2020 Mar 15.
In mixed methods reviewing, data from quantitative and qualitative studies are combined at the review level. One possible way to combine findings of quantitative and qualitative studies is to quantitize qualitative findings prior to their incorporation in a quantitative review. There are only a few examples of the quantification of qualitative findings within this context. This study adds to current research on mixed methods review methodology by reporting the pilot implementation of a new four-step quantitizing approach. We report how we extract and quantitize the strength of relationships found in qualitative studies by assigning correlations to vague quantifiers in text fragments. This article describes (a) how the analysis is prepared; (b) how vague quantifiers in text fragments are organized and transformed to numerical values; (c) how qualitative studies as a whole are assigned effect sizes; and (d) how the overall mean effects size and variance can be calculated. The pilot implementation shows how findings from 26 primary qualitative studies are transformed into mean effect sizes and corresponding variances.
在混合方法综述中,定量和定性研究的数据在综述层面上进行合并。将定量和定性研究的结果合并的一种可能方法是在将定性研究结果纳入定量综述之前对其进行量化。在这种情况下,只有少数将定性研究结果量化的例子。本研究通过报告新的四步量化方法的初步实施,为混合方法综述方法的当前研究做出了贡献。我们报告了如何通过将相关性分配给文本片段中的模糊量词来提取和量化定性研究中发现的关系强度。本文描述了:(a) 分析准备情况;(b) 如何组织和转换文本片段中的模糊量词以转化为数值;(c) 如何为整个定性研究分配效应量;以及(d) 如何计算总体平均效应量和方差。初步实施表明如何将 26 项主要定性研究的结果转化为平均效应量和相应的方差。