Farnsworth Ii James L, Evans Todd, Binkley Helen, Kang Minsoo
J Sport Rehabil. 2020 Feb 27;30(2):278-285. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2019-0263.
Documentation of patient outcomes following injury is critical to ensure that patients are receiving the best care. Several patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been developed to assess knee-related function following injury; however, there is limited data investigating the measurement properties of these instruments using Rasch model analyses.
To evaluate the measurement properties of several PROMs through application of the Rasch measurement model.
Cross-sectional study.
Clinical setting.
A convenience sample of 160 adults (mean age = 28.08 [10.95] y; male = 38.10%) were recruited for this study. Data collected were combined with existing pilot data from an earlier study containing de-identified Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) data from 79 adults with knee injuries resulting in a total sample size of 239 adults.
INTERVENTION(S): Psychometric evaluation of the KOOS, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form, and the Marx Activity Rating Scale using the Rasch partial credit model.
Infit and outfit statistics, item step difficulties, person ability parameters, category function, and item and test information functions.
Large ceiling effects were present in the KOOS and International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form. Of the 65 items examined in this study, 35 items showed poor measurement properties. Item step difficulty for the remaining 30 items ranged from -5.45 (least difficult) to 0.57 logits (most difficult). The 5-category response options did not function well. Measurement precision decreased significantly as ability score increased beyond 0.30 logits.
Despite their use in clinical practice, several items showed poor measurement properties. Future studies are needed to develop and evaluate novel items that are suitable for measuring knee-related function in high-functioning populations to ensure continuity of PROMs as individuals recover from injuries.
记录受伤患者的治疗结果对于确保患者获得最佳治疗至关重要。已经开发了几种患者报告的结局指标(PROMs)来评估受伤后的膝关节相关功能;然而,使用拉施模型分析来研究这些工具测量特性的数据有限。
通过应用拉施测量模型评估几种PROMs的测量特性。
横断面研究。
临床环境。
本研究招募了160名成年人的便利样本(平均年龄=28.08[10.95]岁;男性=38.10%)。收集的数据与早期一项研究的现有试点数据相结合,该研究包含79名膝关节受伤成年人的去识别化膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(KOOS)数据,最终样本量为239名成年人。
使用拉施部分计分模型对KOOS、国际膝关节文献委员会主观膝关节表格和马克思活动评分量表进行心理测量评估。
拟合度和装备统计量、项目步骤难度、个体能力参数、类别功能以及项目和测试信息功能。
KOOS和国际膝关节文献委员会主观膝关节表格中存在较大的天花板效应。在本研究中检查的65个项目中,35个项目显示出较差的测量特性。其余30个项目的项目步骤难度范围为-5.45(最容易)至0.57对数单位(最难)。5类反应选项效果不佳。随着能力得分超过0.30对数单位,测量精度显著下降。
尽管这些指标在临床实践中被使用,但一些项目显示出较差的测量特性。未来需要开展研究来开发和评估适合测量高功能人群膝关节相关功能的新指标,以确保随着个体从损伤中恢复,PROMs的连续性。