• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性病自我管理支持干预对与社会经济地位相关的健康不平等差距有何影响:系统评价。

What impact do chronic disease self-management support interventions have on health inequity gaps related to socioeconomic status: a systematic review.

机构信息

La Trobe University Rural Health School, 471 Benetook Avenue, Mildura, Victoria, 3500, Australia.

Sunraysia Community Health Services, 137 Thirteenth Street, Mildura, Victoria, 3500, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 27;20(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-5010-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-020-5010-4
PMID:32106889
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7045733/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The social gradient in chronic disease (CD) is well-documented, and the ability to effectively self-manage is crucial to reducing morbidity and mortality from CD. This systematic review aimed to assess the moderating effect of socioeconomic status on self-management support (SMS) interventions in relation to participation, retention and post-intervention outcomes.

METHODS

Six databases were searched for studies of any design published until December 2018. Eligible studies reported on outcomes from SMS interventions for adults with chronic disease, where socioeconomic status was recorded and a between-groups comparison on SES was made. Possible outcomes were participation rates, retention rates and clinical or behavioural post-intervention results.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies were retrieved, including five studies on participation, five on attrition and nine studies reporting on outcomes following SMS intervention. All participation studies reported reduced engagement in low SES cohorts. Studies assessing retention and post-intervention outcomes had variable results, related to the diversity of interventions. A reduction in health disparity was seen in longer interventions that were individually tailored. Most studies did not provide a theoretical justification for the intervention being investigated, although four studies referred to Bandura's concept of self-efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

The limited research suggests that socioeconomic status does moderate the efficacy of SMS interventions, such that without careful tailoring and direct targeting of barriers to self-management, SMS may exacerbate the social gradient in chronic disease outcomes. Screening for patient disadvantage or workload, rather than simply recording SES, may increase the chances of tailored interventions being directed to those most likely to benefit from them. Future interventions for low SES populations should consider focussing more on treatment burden and patient capacity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration CRD42019124760. Registration date 17/4/19.

摘要

背景

慢性疾病(CD)的社会梯度是有据可查的,而有效自我管理对于降低 CD 的发病率和死亡率至关重要。本系统评价旨在评估社会经济地位对自我管理支持(SMS)干预在参与度、保留率和干预后结果方面的调节作用。

方法

检索了截至 2018 年 12 月的六个数据库中任何设计的研究。合格的研究报告了针对慢性疾病成人的 SMS 干预的结果,其中记录了社会经济地位,并对 SES 进行了组间比较。可能的结果是参与率、保留率和临床或行为干预后结果。

结果

共检索到 19 项研究,其中 5 项研究参与度、5 项研究失访率和 9 项研究报告 SMS 干预后的结果。所有参与度研究都报告称,SES 较低的队列参与度降低。评估保留率和干预后结果的研究结果各不相同,这与干预措施的多样性有关。在时间较长且针对个体的干预措施中,健康差距有所缩小。大多数研究没有为正在研究的干预措施提供理论依据,尽管有四项研究提到了班杜拉的自我效能概念。

结论

有限的研究表明,社会经济地位确实调节了 SMS 干预的效果,因此,如果不仔细调整和直接针对自我管理的障碍,SMS 可能会加剧慢性疾病结果的社会梯度。对患者劣势或工作量进行筛查,而不仅仅是记录 SES,可能会增加针对最有可能从中受益的患者进行定制干预的机会。针对 SES 较低人群的未来干预措施应更多地关注治疗负担和患者能力。

试验注册

PROSPERO 注册 CRD42019124760。注册日期为 19 年 4 月 17 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e63/7045733/58ac4d956d6a/12913_2020_5010_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e63/7045733/58ac4d956d6a/12913_2020_5010_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e63/7045733/58ac4d956d6a/12913_2020_5010_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
What impact do chronic disease self-management support interventions have on health inequity gaps related to socioeconomic status: a systematic review.慢性病自我管理支持干预对与社会经济地位相关的健康不平等差距有何影响:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 27;20(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-5010-4.
2
Helping patients help themselves: A systematic review of self-management support strategies in primary health care practice.帮助患者自助:初级卫生保健实践中自我管理支持策略的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 1;14(8):e0220116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220116. eCollection 2019.
3
4
The effect of weight management interventions that include a diet component on weight-related outcomes in pregnant and postpartum women: a systematic review protocol.包含饮食成分的体重管理干预措施对孕妇和产后女性体重相关结局的影响:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):88-98. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1812.
5
6
The effectiveness of the teach-back method on adherence and self-management in health education for people with chronic disease: a systematic review.反馈教学法对慢性病患者健康教育中依从性和自我管理的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Jan;14(1):210-47. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2296.
7
Systematic literature review on effectiveness of self-management support interventions in patients with chronic conditions and low socio-economic status.关于自我管理支持干预措施对慢性病患者及社会经济地位较低者有效性的系统文献综述。
J Adv Nurs. 2017 Apr;73(4):775-793. doi: 10.1111/jan.13159. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
8
9
A multidisciplinary self-management intervention among patients with multimorbidity and the impact of socioeconomic factors on results.多学科多病种自我管理干预对多种疾病患者的影响及社会经济因素对结果的影响。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Apr 22;20(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0943-6.
10
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometrics of the autonomy and relatedness inventory in persons with type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病患者自主性与关联性量表的心理测量学研究
BMC Psychol. 2025 Aug 31;13(1):994. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03374-9.
2
Associations Between Socioeconomic Status and Adherence to Medications in People With Cystic Fibrosis.囊性纤维化患者的社会经济地位与药物依从性之间的关联
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2025 Aug;60(8):e71230. doi: 10.1002/ppul.71230.
3
Adapting an Osteoarthritis Peer Mentorship Intervention for Remote Delivery to People Experiencing Socioeconomic Disadvantage: A Multi-Method Approach.

本文引用的文献

1
Crossing the Digital Divide in Online Self-Management Support: Analysis of Usage Data From HeLP-Diabetes.弥合在线自我管理支持中的数字鸿沟:对HeLP-糖尿病项目使用数据的分析
JMIR Diabetes. 2018 Dec 6;3(4):e10925. doi: 10.2196/10925.
2
Sociodemographic Factors Associated With Engagement in Diabetes Self-management Education Among People With Diabetes in the United States.美国糖尿病患者参与糖尿病自我管理教育的社会人口学因素分析。
Public Health Rep. 2018 Nov;133(6):685-691. doi: 10.1177/0033354918794935. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
3
Pain Self-Management: Easier Said than Done? Factors Associated with Early Dropout from Pain Self-Management in a Rural Primary Care Population.
调整骨关节炎同伴指导干预措施以远程提供给处于社会经济不利地位的人群:一种多方法途径。
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70245. doi: 10.1111/hex.70245.
4
Advanced applications in chronic disease monitoring using IoT mobile sensing device data, machine learning algorithms and frame theory: a systematic review.利用物联网移动传感设备数据、机器学习算法和框架理论在慢性病监测中的高级应用:一项系统综述。
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 21;13:1510456. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1510456. eCollection 2025.
5
Lack of diversity in antifibrotic trials for pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review.肺纤维化抗纤维化试验缺乏多样性:一项系统评价
Eur Respir Rev. 2025 Mar 5;34(175). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0201-2024. Print 2025 Jan.
6
Exploring Barriers and Facilitators to Self-Management for Patients With Persistent Musculoskeletal Conditions Following NHS-Led Hydrotherapy: A Service Evaluation.探索英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)主导的水疗后持续性肌肉骨骼疾病患者自我管理的障碍与促进因素:一项服务评估
Musculoskeletal Care. 2025 Mar;23(1):e70075. doi: 10.1002/msc.70075.
7
A self-management intervention for newly diagnosed with inflammatory arthritis: a randomized controlled feasibility and fidelity study.一项针对新诊断为炎性关节炎患者的自我管理干预措施:一项随机对照可行性与保真度研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 Feb 11;11(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01601-z.
8
Does social support improve self-management among rural hypertensive patients? An empirical analysis based on generalized propensity score matching.社会支持能否改善农村高血压患者的自我管理?基于广义倾向得分匹配的实证分析。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 7;12:1445946. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1445946. eCollection 2024.
9
A Proposed Framework to Aid Primary Care Clinicians in Promoting Cardiovascular Health.一个帮助初级保健临床医生促进心血管健康的提议框架。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Jan 21. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09351-7.
10
Navigating diabetes care inequities: an observational study linking chronic care model's structural elements to process and outcomes of type 2 diabetes care in Belgium.应对糖尿病护理不平等问题:一项观察性研究,将慢性病护理模式的结构要素与比利时2型糖尿病护理的过程和结果相联系。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jan 20;24(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02372-4.
疼痛自我管理:说起来容易做起来难?农村初级保健人群中与早期退出疼痛自我管理相关的因素。
Pain Med. 2019 Feb 1;20(2):267-277. doi: 10.1093/pm/pny167.
4
Does the chronic care model meet the emerging needs of people living with multimorbidity? A systematic review and thematic synthesis.慢性病照护模式是否满足患有多种慢性病患者的新需求?一项系统综述与主题综合分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 8;13(2):e0190852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190852. eCollection 2018.
5
An Integrative Review of Factors Associated with Patient Attrition from Community Health Worker Programs that Support Diabetes Self-Care.对支持糖尿病自我护理的社区卫生工作者项目中与患者流失相关因素的综合综述。
J Community Health Nurs. 2017 Oct-Dec;34(4):214-228. doi: 10.1080/07370016.2017.1369811.
6
Web-based self-management support for people with type 2 diabetes (HeLP-Diabetes): randomised controlled trial in English primary care.基于网络的 2 型糖尿病患者自我管理支持(HeLP-Diabetes):在英国初级保健中的随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 27;7(9):e016009. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016009.
7
Participation in a Diabetes Self-Management Class Among Adults With Diabetes, New Jersey 2013-2015.2013-2015 年新泽西州成年糖尿病患者参加糖尿病自我管理课程的情况。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2017 Aug 3;14:E63. doi: 10.5888/pcd14.170023.
8
Chronic disease self-management education courses: utilization by low-income, middle-aged participants.慢性病自我管理教育课程:中低收入中年参与者的利用情况。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Jun 27;16(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0604-0.
9
Systematic literature review on effectiveness of self-management support interventions in patients with chronic conditions and low socio-economic status.关于自我管理支持干预措施对慢性病患者及社会经济地位较低者有效性的系统文献综述。
J Adv Nurs. 2017 Apr;73(4):775-793. doi: 10.1111/jan.13159. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
10
Peer Support for the Hardly Reached: A Systematic Review.针对难以触及群体的同伴支持:一项系统综述
Am J Public Health. 2016 Jul;106(7):e1-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303180. Epub 2016 May 19.