Xie Yizhao, Ge Rui, Sang Die, Luo Ting, Li Wei, Ji Xuening, Yuan Peng, Wang Biyun
Department of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Cancer Med. 2020 May;9(9):2981-2988. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2943. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
Lapatinib is widely used in the later lines treatment of HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). EGF104900 study suggested that among patients who experienced progression on prior trastuzumab-containing regimens, lapatinib plus trastuzumab had better effects than trastuzumab alone. However, no evidence was discovered in terms of lapatinib plus capetabine compared with lapatinib plus trastuzumab plus chemotherapy, as well as a treatment after progression on lapatinib. We evaluated the medical records retrospectively of all MBC patients with HER2 positive disease who progressed on prior trastuzumab-containing regimens (advanced setting) and a taxane (any setting) and received lapatinib-based treatment from 2015 to 2018 in five institutions in China. A total of 242 patients were available for analysis. Among them, 164 (68%) patients received lapatinib plus capetabine (LX) and 78 (32%) patients received lapatinib plus trastuzumab and one chemotherapy (HLC). The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the HLC group was significantly superior to the LX group (8.8 months vs 5.0 months, P < .0000001). No significant difference in grade 3 or worse adverse events was observed in two groups (P = .57). A total of 175 patients were available for the analysis of the postlapatinib treatment. Continuation of lapatinib showed superior mPFS results compared to the non-anti-HER2 treatment (4 months vs 2 months, P = .01) and similar results compared to switch to other anti-HER2 treatments (4 months vs 4 months, P = .88). In patients who had progressed on prior trastuzumab-base therapy, HLC provided a new dual-targeting treatment option for the later lines therapy of patients with HER2 positive MBC. Moreover, evidence of cross-line use of lapatinib was provided.
拉帕替尼广泛应用于HER2阳性转移性乳腺癌(MBC)的后线治疗。EGF104900研究表明,在先前接受含曲妥珠单抗方案治疗后病情进展的患者中,拉帕替尼联合曲妥珠单抗的疗效优于单纯使用曲妥珠单抗。然而,与拉帕替尼联合曲妥珠单抗加化疗相比,拉帕替尼联合卡培他滨以及拉帕替尼治疗进展后的治疗效果尚无证据。我们回顾性评估了2015年至2018年在中国五家机构中,所有HER2阳性疾病且在先前含曲妥珠单抗方案(晚期)和紫杉烷(任何阶段)治疗后病情进展并接受以拉帕替尼为基础治疗的MBC患者的病历。共有242例患者可供分析。其中,164例(68%)患者接受拉帕替尼联合卡培他滨(LX)治疗,78例(32%)患者接受拉帕替尼联合曲妥珠单抗及一种化疗药物(HLC)治疗。HLC组的中位无进展生存期(PFS)显著优于LX组(8.8个月 vs 5.0个月,P <.0000001)。两组在3级及以上不良事件方面无显著差异(P = 0.57)。共有175例患者可供拉帕替尼治疗后分析。继续使用拉帕替尼显示出优于非抗HER2治疗的mPFS结果(4个月 vs 2个月,P = 0.01),与换用其他抗HER2治疗的结果相似(4个月 vs 4个月,P = 0.88)。在先前接受曲妥珠单抗基础治疗后病情进展的患者中,HLC为HER2阳性MBC患者的后线治疗提供了一种新的双靶点治疗选择。此外,还提供了拉帕替尼跨线使用的证据。