Suppr超能文献

评估氢氧化铜纳米农药和离子铜对土壤酶活性及细菌群落的影响。

Assessing the Impacts of Cu(OH) Nanopesticide and Ionic Copper on the Soil Enzyme Activity and Bacterial Community.

作者信息

Zhang Xiaoxia, Xu Zhenlan, Qian Xiaoting, Lin Daohui, Zeng Tao, Filser Juliane, Li Lingxiangyu, Kah Melanie

机构信息

Department of Chemistry, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310018, People's Republic of China.

Institute of Quality and Standard of Agro-Products, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310021, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Agric Food Chem. 2020 Mar 18;68(11):3372-3381. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b06325. Epub 2020 Mar 5.

Abstract

Nanopesticides are being introduced in agriculture, and the associated environmental risks and benefits must be carefully assessed before their widespread agricultural applications. We investigated the impacts of a commercial Cu(OH) nanopesticide formulation (NPF) at different agricultural application doses (e.g., 0.5, 5, and 50 mg of Cu kg) on enzyme activities and bacterial communities of loamy soil (organic matter content of 3.61%) over 21 days. Results were compared to its ionic analogue (i.e., CuSO) and nano-Cu(OH), including both the commercial unformulated active ingredient of NPF (AI-NPF) and synthesized Cu(OH) nanorods (NR). There were negligible changes in the activity of acid phosphatase, regardless of exposure dose, whereas significant ( < 0.05) variations in activities of invertase, urease, and catalase were observed at a dose of 5 mg kg or higher. Invertase activity decreased with an increasing bioavailable Cu concentration in soil under various treatments. In comparison to CuSO, both Cu(OH) nanopesticide (i.e., NPF) and nano-Cu(OH) (i.e., AI-NPF and NR) caused a significant ( < 0.05) inhibition of urease activity, wherein a significant ( < 0.05) increase in the activity of catalase was observed, representing serious oxidative stress. Accordingly, NPF, AI-NPF, and NR differently affected soil bacterial abundance, diversity, and community compared to CuSO, which could have resulted from the changes in the bioavailable Cu concentration as a result of the distinct nature of copper spiked (i.e., nano form versus salt). Moreover, minor differences in the soil enzyme activity and bacterial community were observed between NPF and AI-NPF, reflecting that the impact of the Cu(OH) nanopesticide was primarily attributed to the presence of nano-Cu(OH). In total, the impacts of nano-Cu(OH) on the soil bacterial community and enzyme activity tested in this study differed from CuSO, shedding light on the environmental risks of the Cu(OH) nanopesticide in the long run.

摘要

纳米农药正在被引入农业领域,在其广泛应用于农业之前,必须仔细评估其相关的环境风险和益处。我们研究了一种商业用氢氧化铜纳米农药制剂(NPF)在不同农业应用剂量(例如,0.5、5和50毫克铜/千克)下,对壤土(有机质含量为3.61%)的酶活性和细菌群落的影响,为期21天。将结果与其离子类似物(即硫酸铜)以及纳米氢氧化铜进行比较,纳米氢氧化铜包括NPF的商业未配方活性成分(AI-NPF)和合成的氢氧化铜纳米棒(NR)。无论暴露剂量如何,酸性磷酸酶的活性变化都可忽略不计,而在5毫克/千克或更高剂量下,观察到转化酶、脲酶和过氧化氢酶的活性有显著(P<0.05)变化。在各种处理下,转化酶活性随土壤中生物可利用铜浓度的增加而降低。与硫酸铜相比,氢氧化铜纳米农药(即NPF)和纳米氢氧化铜(即AI-NPF和NR)均导致脲酶活性显著(P<0.05)抑制,其中观察到过氧化氢酶活性显著(P<0.05)增加,这代表着严重的氧化应激。因此,与硫酸铜相比,NPF、AI-NPF和NR对土壤细菌丰度、多样性和群落的影响不同,这可能是由于添加的铜的性质不同(即纳米形式与盐)导致生物可利用铜浓度变化所致。此外,在NPF和AI-NPF之间观察到土壤酶活性和细菌群落的微小差异,这表明氢氧化铜纳米农药的影响主要归因于纳米氢氧化铜的存在。总体而言,本研究中纳米氢氧化铜对土壤细菌群落和酶活性的影响与硫酸铜不同,从长远来看,这揭示了氢氧化铜纳米农药的环境风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验