• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Designing a Pharmacist Opioid Safety and Intervention Tool.设计药剂师阿片类药物安全与干预工具
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2020 Jan-Feb;73(1):7-12. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
2
Evaluating a Pharmacist-Led Opioid Stewardship Initiative at an Urban Teaching Hospital.评估一家城市教学医院由药剂师主导的阿片类药物管理倡议。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Summer;74(3):248-255. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v74i3.3152. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
3
Characterizing Pharmacist Perspectives on Utilizing a Personalized Family Medication Safety Plan for Opioid Education with Adolescents and Parents.描述药剂师对于利用个性化家庭药物安全计划对青少年及其父母进行阿片类药物教育的看法。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2023 Jan 24;11(1):22. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy11010022.
4
Community Pharmacists' Perspectives on Dispensing Medications With the Potential for Misuse, Diversion, and Intentional Overdose: Results of a Province-Wide Survey of Community Pharmacists in Canada.社区药剂师对分发有滥用、转移和故意过量用药可能性药物的看法:加拿大全省社区药剂师调查结果
Subst Use Misuse. 2016 Nov 9;51(13):1724-30. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2016.1197261. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
5
[Information transmission to the community pharmacist after a patient's discharge from the hospital: setting up of a written medication discharge form, prospective evaluation of its impact, and survey of the information needs of the pharmacists].[患者出院后向社区药剂师的信息传递:设立书面出院用药表单、对其影响的前瞻性评估以及药剂师信息需求调查]
J Pharm Belg. 2015 Mar(1):42-54.
6
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
7
Routine opioid outcome monitoring in community pharmacy: Pilot implementation study protocol.社区药房常规阿片类药物结局监测:试点实施研究方案。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Aug;15(8):1047-1055. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.10.024. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
8
What predicts pharmacists' engagement with opioid-outcome screening? Secondary analysis from an implementation study in community pharmacy.哪些因素可预测药剂师参与阿片类药物结果筛查?一项社区药房实施研究的二次分析。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2021 Apr;43(2):420-429. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01074-5. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
9
A pharmacist-led intervention to improve the management of opioids in a general practice: a qualitative evaluation of participant interviews.药剂师主导的干预措施改善一般实践中的阿片类药物管理:对参与者访谈的定性评估。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2022 Feb;44(1):235-246. doi: 10.1007/s11096-021-01340-0. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
10
Evaluation of the General Practice Pharmacist (GPP) intervention to optimise prescribing in Irish primary care: a non-randomised pilot study.评价全科药师(GPP)干预以优化爱尔兰初级保健中的处方:一项非随机试点研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 28;10(6):e035087. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035087.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating a Pharmacist-Led Opioid Stewardship Initiative at an Urban Teaching Hospital.评估一家城市教学医院由药剂师主导的阿片类药物管理倡议。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Summer;74(3):248-255. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v74i3.3152. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
2
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2020 Jan-Feb;73(1):5-6. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
3
Opioid Stewardship: Moving Beyond the "Why" to the "How".阿片类药物管理:从“为何”转向“如何”。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2020 Jan-Feb;73(1):3-4. Epub 2020 Feb 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Opioid Prescribing at Hospital Discharge Contributes to Chronic Opioid Use.出院时开具阿片类药物处方会导致长期使用阿片类药物。
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 May;31(5):478-85. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3539-4.
2
High levels of opioid analgesic co-prescription among methadone maintenance treatment clients in British Columbia, Canada: results from a population-level retrospective cohort study.加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省美沙酮维持治疗患者中阿片类镇痛药的高联合处方率:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究结果
Am J Addict. 2014 May-Jun;23(3):257-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2014.12091.x.
3
Implementation of a pain medication stewardship program.实施疼痛药物管理计划。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013 Dec 1;70(23):2070, 2074-5. doi: 10.2146/ajhp120751.
4
"Every 'never' I ever said came true": transitions from opioid pills to heroin injecting.“我所说的每一个‘绝不’都成真了”:从服用阿片类药丸到注射海洛因的转变
Int J Drug Policy. 2014 Mar;25(2):257-66. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.10.004. Epub 2013 Oct 19.
5
Prescription opioid related misuse, harms, diversion and interventions in Canada: a review.加拿大与处方阿片类药物相关的滥用、危害、转移和干预措施:综述。
Pain Physician. 2012 Jul;15(3 Suppl):ES191-203.
6
Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research.理论领域框架在行为改变和实施研究中的验证。
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:37. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-37.
7
Patterns in the use of benzodiazepines in British Columbia: examining the impact of increasing research and guideline cautions against long-term use.不列颠哥伦比亚省苯二氮䓬类药物使用模式:研究长期使用的警示对其使用的影响。
Health Policy. 2010 Oct;97(2-3):122-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.03.008. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
8
Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach.使心理学理论有助于实施循证实践:一种共识方法。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Feb;14(1):26-33. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.011155.

设计药剂师阿片类药物安全与干预工具

Designing a Pharmacist Opioid Safety and Intervention Tool.

作者信息

Woods Brendan, Legal Michael, Shalansky Stephen, Mihic Tamara, Ma Winnie

机构信息

, BScPharm, ACPR, is a Clinical Pharmacist with Royal University Hospital, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.

, BScPharm, PharmD, ACPR, FCSHP, is Clinical Pharmacy Manager with Lower Mainland Pharmacy Services, Vancouver, British Columbia.

出版信息

Can J Hosp Pharm. 2020 Jan-Feb;73(1):7-12. Epub 2020 Feb 1.

PMID:32109955
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7023926/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the recent increase in opioid overdoses across Canada, few pharmacy-led initiatives have been implemented to address issues related to opioid prescribing in the hospital setting.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this study was to develop a clinical tool, intended for use by hospital pharmacists and informed by best practices from the literature, that would provide a structured approach to enhancing the safety of opioid prescribing. The secondary objective was to collect pharmacists' opinions about the feasibility and utility of this tool.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search and pharmacist focus group analysis provided content for development of a candidate clinical tool. This tool was then piloted by clinical pharmacists working on general medical and surgical units in a single hospital. Pharmacists participating in the pilot were invited to complete an online survey concerning their perceptions of the tool. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the survey results.

RESULTS

The literature search and focus group analysis led to development of a candidate clinical tool that focused on Medication review, Optimization, Reassessment, and Education (MORE). It included key risk factors relating to opioid safety, along with suggested mitigating strategies. The MORE tool was piloted for 3 weeks by 14 clinical pharmacists, 9 of whom responded to the subsequent survey. Five respondents indicated that the clinical tool increased their ability to identify risk factors. Five respondents also noted an increase in their ability to identify possible interventions. Most respondents felt that the tool was useful and that it would be feasible to integrate it into their practice; however, they noted that a more streamlined version could improve ease of use.

CONCLUSIONS

The MORE tool was well received by clinical pharmacists. Implementation of the tool into routine practice requires additional changes to improve ease of use. Suggestions for modifying and streamlining the tool will be incorporated into future versions.

摘要

背景

尽管近期加拿大阿片类药物过量使用情况有所增加,但在医院环境中,由药房主导的旨在解决与阿片类药物处方相关问题的举措却很少。

目的

本研究的主要目的是开发一种临床工具,供医院药剂师使用,并以文献中的最佳实践为依据,该工具将提供一种结构化方法来提高阿片类药物处方的安全性。次要目的是收集药剂师对该工具的可行性和实用性的意见。

方法

全面的文献检索和药剂师焦点小组分析为候选临床工具的开发提供了内容。然后,该工具由一家医院普通内科和外科病房的临床药剂师进行试点。邀请参与试点的药剂师完成一项关于他们对该工具看法的在线调查。使用描述性统计分析调查结果。

结果

文献检索和焦点小组分析导致开发了一种候选临床工具,该工具侧重于药物审查、优化、重新评估和教育(MORE)。它包括与阿片类药物安全相关的关键风险因素以及建议的缓解策略。14名临床药剂师对MORE工具进行了为期3周的试点,其中9人对随后的调查做出了回应。5名受访者表示,该临床工具提高了他们识别风险因素的能力。5名受访者还指出,他们识别可能干预措施的能力有所提高。大多数受访者认为该工具很有用,并且将其整合到他们的实践中是可行的;然而,他们指出,更简化的版本可以提高易用性。

结论

临床药剂师对MORE工具评价很高。将该工具应用于常规实践需要进行更多更改以提高易用性。修改和简化该工具的建议将纳入未来版本。