Suppr超能文献

不同时间段使用的颌间弹力牵引所释放力量的比较。

Comparison of the Force Released by Intermaxillary Elastics Used for Different Time Periods.

作者信息

Nitrini Andressa Tribulato Lopes, Chagas Adenilson Silva, Freitas Karina Maria Salvatore, Valarelli Fabrício Pinelli, Cançado Rodrigo Hermont, de Oliveira Renata Cristina Gobbi, de Oliveira Ricardo Cesar Gobbi

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, UNINGA University Center, Maringá, Brazil.

出版信息

Turk J Orthod. 2019 Dec 1;32(4):190-194. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18022. eCollection 2019 Dec.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study was to compare the strength degradation of the force of intermaxillary elastic used for different periods.

METHODS

The sample included intermaxillary elastics used for 20 adult patients with bilateral Class II or III malocclusion in orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances, with a mean age of 27.25 years. Latex orthodontic elastics with 3/16 inch of diameter were used, with an average stretching of three times its diameter. The elastics were used in the same patient bilaterally for different periods, with each pair of elastics used for 1, 12, 24, and 48h. Thus, the sample consisted of 200 elastics, with 40 being used in each period (one pair used by each patient) and 40 new elastics without use tested as control. Elastics were tested using a universal testing machine, stretched with a velocity of 30 mm/min, and the force was evaluated in stretches of 15, 20, 25, and 30 mm. The degradation force was compared in the four different times of use and control by one-way ANOVA (analysis of variance) and Tukey tests.

RESULTS

There were significant differences among the groups in all evaluated stretches (15, 20, 25, and 30 mm). The control elastics presented higher average forces numerically and statistically significant for all tested times, except for the elastic used for 1h. The elastics used for 1, 12, and 24h had similar forces among them, with a significant difference to the elastics used for 48h.

CONCLUSION

It is recommended to change the intermaxillary elastics after 24 h of use.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是比较用于不同时间段的颌间弹力的强度降解情况。

方法

样本包括用于20例接受固定矫治器正畸治疗的双侧安氏II类或III类错牙合成年患者的颌间弹力,平均年龄27.25岁。使用直径为3/16英寸的乳胶正畸弹力,平均拉伸为其直径的三倍。弹力在同一患者双侧用于不同时间段,每对弹力分别使用1、12、24和48小时。因此,样本由200个弹力组成,每个时间段使用40个(每位患者使用一对),并测试40个未使用的新弹力作为对照。使用万能试验机对弹力进行测试,以30毫米/分钟的速度拉伸,并在15、20、25和30毫米的拉伸时评估力。通过单因素方差分析(方差分析)和Tukey检验比较四个不同使用时间和对照的降解力。

结果

在所有评估的拉伸(15、20、25和30毫米)中,各组之间存在显著差异。对照弹力在所有测试时间的数值上和统计学上均呈现出较高的平均力,但用于1小时的弹力除外。用于1、12和24小时的弹力之间的力相似,与用于48小时的弹力有显著差异。

结论

建议在使用24小时后更换颌间弹力。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Force Released by Intermaxillary Elastics Used for Different Time Periods.
Turk J Orthod. 2019 Dec 1;32(4):190-194. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18022. eCollection 2019 Dec.
2
Dynamic force decay evaluation of latex and non-latex orthodontic elastics.
J Orofac Orthop. 2022 Sep;83(5):318-324. doi: 10.1007/s00056-021-00319-w. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
3
In vitro study of structural and mechanical properties of latex and non-latex intermaxillary orthodontic elastics.
J Orofac Orthop. 2023 Apr;84(Suppl 2):111-122. doi: 10.1007/s00056-022-00395-6. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
4
Elasticity in Elastics-An in-vitro study.
J Int Oral Health. 2014 Apr;6(2):96-105. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
5
Force degradation of orthodontic latex elastics analyzed in vivo and in vitro.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Mar;157(3):313-319. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.03.028.
6
Influence of different beverages on the force degradation of intermaxillary elastics: an in vitro study.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2013 Mar-Apr;21(2):145-9. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757201302256.
7
Force decay of latex and non-latex intermaxillary elastics: a clinical study.
Eur J Orthod. 2016 Feb;38(1):39-43. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv005. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
8
A comparison of dynamic and static testing of latex and nonlatex orthodontic elastics.
Angle Orthod. 2003 Apr;73(2):181-6. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)73<181:ACODAS>2.0.CO;2.
10
Influence of temperature and humidity on the long-term storage of latex and non-latex orthodontic elastics.
J Orthod. 2017 Sep;44(3):183-192. doi: 10.1080/14653125.2017.1353788. Epub 2017 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Force decay of latex and non-latex intermaxillary elastics: a clinical study.
Eur J Orthod. 2016 Feb;38(1):39-43. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv005. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
2
Influence of different beverages on the force degradation of intermaxillary elastics: an in vitro study.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2013 Mar-Apr;21(2):145-9. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757201302256.
3
Force extension relaxation of medium force orthodontic latex elastics.
Angle Orthod. 2011 Sep;81(5):812-9. doi: 10.2319/120810-709.1. Epub 2011 May 26.
4
In vitro study of force decay of latex and non-latex orthodontic elastics.
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Apr;34(2):202-7. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq188. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
5
Orthodontic elastics: is some tightening needed?
Angle Orthod. 2010 Sep;80(5):988-9. doi: 10.2319/0003-3219-80.5.988.
7
Orthodontic latex elastics: a force relaxation study.
Angle Orthod. 2006 May;76(3):475-9. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0475:OLE]2.0.CO;2.
8
An in vitro study simulating effects of daily diet and patient elastic band change compliance on orthodontic latex elastics.
Angle Orthod. 2004 Apr;74(2):234-9. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0234:AIVSSE>2.0.CO;2.
9
Mechanical and biological comparison of latex and silicone rubber bands.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Oct;124(4):379-86. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00564-x.
10
A comparison of dynamic and static testing of latex and nonlatex orthodontic elastics.
Angle Orthod. 2003 Apr;73(2):181-6. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)73<181:ACODAS>2.0.CO;2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验