Division of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, 6-320 Moos Health Science Tower, 515 Delaware Street S.E., 55455, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
J Orofac Orthop. 2022 Sep;83(5):318-324. doi: 10.1007/s00056-021-00319-w. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
To evaluate the force decay over time of latex and non-latex orthodontic elastics subjected to either static or dynamic stretching under simulated intraoral conditions.
Four types of elastics (1/4-inch 4.5 ounces and 1/4-inch 6.5 ounces, each latex and non-latex) were subjected to either static stretching to 3 times internal diameter (ID) or dynamic stretching from 3 to 4.5 times ID in artificial saliva at 37 °C for 24 h. Forces generated by the elastics were measured at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h. Differences among elastic types, time points, and between stretching regimens were tested for statistical significance (P < 0.05).
Both stretching regimens caused rapid force decay in all elastic types, which was significantly higher in the non-latex elastics than in the latex elastics. In contrast, there were no differences between elastic types made of the same material. With both stretching regimens, the force decay was significant only after the first hour for the latex elastics, whereas it remained significant up to 24 h for the non-latex elastics. All elastic types generated significantly lower forces after dynamic stretching than after static stretching with 70.2, 68.8, and 66.1% of the initial force remaining after 4, 8, and 24 h for latex elastics and 48.0, 40.8, and 29.5% for non-latex elastics.
Latex elastics retained significantly more force over time than their non-latex equivalents. Because of the higher force decay in a dynamic environment, it is important that non-latex elastics be changed more frequently.
评估在模拟口腔内条件下,经静态或动态拉伸后,乳胶和非乳胶正畸橡皮筋随时间推移的力衰减情况。
将四种类型的橡皮筋(1/4 英寸 4.5 盎司和 1/4 英寸 6.5 盎司,乳胶和非乳胶各两种)分别进行静态拉伸至 3 倍内径(ID)或动态拉伸至 3 至 4.5 倍 ID,在 37°C 的人工唾液中持续 24 小时。在 0、1、2、4、8、12 和 24 小时测量橡皮筋产生的力。测试弹性类型、时间点和拉伸方案之间的差异是否具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
两种拉伸方案均导致所有弹性类型的快速力衰减,其中非乳胶弹性的衰减明显高于乳胶弹性。相比之下,同一种材料制成的弹性类型之间没有差异。对于两种拉伸方案,乳胶弹性的力衰减在第一小时后才变得显著,而非乳胶弹性的力衰减在 24 小时内仍然显著。与静态拉伸相比,所有弹性类型在动态拉伸后产生的力都显著降低,4、8 和 24 小时后,乳胶弹性保留了初始力的 70.2%、68.8%和 66.1%,而非乳胶弹性保留了 48.0%、40.8%和 29.5%。
乳胶弹性随时间推移保留的力明显高于非乳胶弹性。由于在动态环境中力衰减更高,因此非乳胶弹性需要更频繁地更换。