Suppr超能文献

基于弹性使用持续时间和唾液pH浓度的乳胶和非乳胶弹力带的力衰减差异:研究

Difference in force decay latex and non-latex elastic band based on duration of elastic use and salivary pH concentration: study.

作者信息

Bakri Rasdiana, Ranggang Baharuddin M, Hidayati Nasyrah

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia.

出版信息

J Orthod Sci. 2025 Mar 25;14:7. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_58_24. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the difference in force decay between latex and non-latex elastic bands based on duration of use and salivary pH concentration.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

The calculation of the sample size in this study used Federer. Total sample size is 80 and divided into four groups. First group consists of 20 elastic bands made from latex immersed in artificial saliva pH 5.2, second group consists of 20 elastic bands made from latex immersed in artificial saliva pH 6.7, third group consists of 20 elastic bands made from non-latex immersed in artificial saliva pH 5.2, and fourth group consists of 20 non-latex elastic bands immersed in artificial saliva pH 6.7. All samples were incubated at 37°C, and force magnitude was measured with a digital force gauge.

RESULTS

The most force decay occurred in the first 24 hours when immersed in artificial saliva and was constant for up to 72 hours The elastic band immersed in salivary pH concentration showed greater force decay compared with pH 6.7 both latex and non-latex.

CONCLUSION

There was a significant difference in force decay of elastic bands made from latex and non-latex based on duration of elastic use. Force decay of elastic bands made from non-latex was greater than latex material. There was a difference in force decay elastic bands made from latex and non-latex based on the pH concentration of saliva. Force decay elastic band made from non-latex is greater than latex material and greater at pH 5.2 compared to 6.7.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在根据使用时长和唾液pH浓度,确定乳胶和非乳胶弹力带之间的力衰减差异。

材料与方法

本研究样本量的计算采用费德勒法。总样本量为80,分为四组。第一组由20条浸入pH值为5.2的人工唾液中的乳胶弹力带组成,第二组由20条浸入pH值为6.7的人工唾液中的乳胶弹力带组成,第三组由20条浸入pH值为5.2的人工唾液中的非乳胶弹力带组成,第四组由20条浸入pH值为6.7的人工唾液中的非乳胶弹力带组成。所有样本均在37°C下孵育,并用数字测力计测量力的大小。

结果

浸入人工唾液后的前24小时内,力衰减最为明显,且在长达72小时内保持恒定。与pH值为6.7的情况相比,无论是乳胶还是非乳胶,浸入唾液pH浓度中的弹力带都表现出更大的力衰减。

结论

基于弹力带的使用时长,乳胶和非乳胶弹力带在力衰减方面存在显著差异。非乳胶弹力带的力衰减大于乳胶材料。基于唾液的pH浓度,乳胶和非乳胶弹力带在力衰减方面存在差异。非乳胶弹力带的力衰减大于乳胶材料,且在pH值为5.2时比pH值为6.7时更大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6da9/12036759/85d4b2c71249/JOS-14-7-g001.jpg

相似文献

2
Force degradation trend of latex and nonlatex orthodontic elastics after 48 hours stretching.
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2018 Oct 11;10:211-220. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S173648. eCollection 2018.
3
Synergic effect of salivary pH baselines and low pH intakes on the force relaxation of orthodontic latex elastics.
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2017 Jan-Feb;14(1):68-72. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.201129.
4
Mechanical and biological comparison of latex and silicone rubber bands.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Oct;124(4):379-86. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00564-x.
5
Dynamic force decay evaluation of latex and non-latex orthodontic elastics.
J Orofac Orthop. 2022 Sep;83(5):318-324. doi: 10.1007/s00056-021-00319-w. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
6
The effect of pH levels on nonlatex vs latex interarch elastics.
Angle Orthod. 2011 Nov;81(6):1070-4. doi: 10.2319/011811-34.1. Epub 2011 May 24.
7
Elasticity in Elastics-An in-vitro study.
J Int Oral Health. 2014 Apr;6(2):96-105. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
8
9
Force degradation of orthodontic latex elastics analyzed in vivo and in vitro.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Mar;157(3):313-319. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.03.028.
10
Force decay evaluation of latex and non-latex orthodontic intraoral elastics: in vivo study.
Dental Press J Orthod. 2018 Nov-Dec;23(6):42-47. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.23.6.042-047.oar.

本文引用的文献

2
Comparison of the Force Released by Intermaxillary Elastics Used for Different Time Periods.
Turk J Orthod. 2019 Dec 1;32(4):190-194. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18022. eCollection 2019 Dec.
3
Synergic effect of salivary pH baselines and low pH intakes on the force relaxation of orthodontic latex elastics.
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2017 Jan-Feb;14(1):68-72. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.201129.
4
Elasticity in Elastics-An in-vitro study.
J Int Oral Health. 2014 Apr;6(2):96-105. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
5
The influence of pH levels on mechanical and biological properties of nonlatex and latex elastics.
Angle Orthod. 2012 Jul;82(4):709-14. doi: 10.2319/082811-552.1. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
7
An in vitro comparison of 4 brands of nonlatex orthodontic elastics.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Apr;123(4):401-7. doi: 10.1067/mod.2003.22.
8
Comparison of alastik chains with elastics involved with intra-arch molar to molar forces.
Angle Orthod. 1970 Jul;40(3):151-8. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1970)040<0151:COACWE>2.0.CO;2.
9
The effect of hydrogen ion concentration on the force-degradation rate of orthodontic polyurethane chain elastics.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Nov;98(5):404-10. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81648-8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验