• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用证据映射来审视遵循植物性饮食的动机。

Using Evidence Mapping to Examine Motivations for Following Plant-Based Diets.

作者信息

Miki Akari J, Livingston Kara A, Karlsen Micaela C, Folta Sara C, McKeown Nicola M

机构信息

Nutritional Epidemiology, Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.

University of New England, Biddeford, ME, USA.

出版信息

Curr Dev Nutr. 2020 Feb 5;4(3):nzaa013. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzaa013. eCollection 2020 Mar.

DOI:10.1093/cdn/nzaa013
PMID:32110769
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7042611/
Abstract

Motivations to adopt plant-based diets are of great public health interest. We used evidence mapping to identify methods that capture motivations to follow plant-based diets and summarize demographic trends in dietary motivations. We identified 56 publications that described 90 samples of plant-based diet followers and their dietary motivations. We categorized the samples by type of plant-based diet: vegan (19%), vegetarian (33%), semivegetarian (24%), and other, unspecified plant-based diet followers (23%). Of 90 studies examined, 31% administered multiple-choice questions to capture motivations, followed by rate items (23%), Food Choice Questionnaire (17%), free response (9%), and rank choices (10%). Commonly reported motivations were health, sensory/taste/disgust, animal welfare, environmental concern, and weight loss. The methodological variation highlights the importance of using a structured questionnaire to investigate dietary motivations in epidemiological studies. Motivations among plant-based diet followers appear distinct, but evidence on the association between age and motivations appears limited.

摘要

采用植物性饮食的动机具有重大的公共卫生意义。我们运用证据图谱来确定能够捕捉遵循植物性饮食动机的方法,并总结饮食动机方面的人口统计学趋势。我们识别出56篇描述了90个植物性饮食追随者样本及其饮食动机的出版物。我们根据植物性饮食的类型对样本进行了分类:纯素食者(19%)、素食者(33%)、半素食者(24%)以及其他未明确的植物性饮食追随者(23%)。在90项研究中,31%采用多项选择题来获取动机,其次是评分项目(23%)、食物选择问卷(17%)、自由回答(9%)和排序选择(10%)。常见的动机包括健康、感官/口味/厌恶、动物福利、环境关注和减肥。方法上的差异凸显了在流行病学研究中使用结构化问卷来调查饮食动机的重要性。植物性饮食追随者的动机似乎各不相同,但关于年龄与动机之间关联的证据似乎有限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dba5/7042611/a21d95490a0f/nzaa013fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dba5/7042611/bdbf431af4a0/nzaa013fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dba5/7042611/7594fe77a879/nzaa013fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dba5/7042611/9b4f19b69236/nzaa013fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dba5/7042611/a21d95490a0f/nzaa013fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dba5/7042611/bdbf431af4a0/nzaa013fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dba5/7042611/7594fe77a879/nzaa013fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dba5/7042611/9b4f19b69236/nzaa013fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dba5/7042611/a21d95490a0f/nzaa013fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Using Evidence Mapping to Examine Motivations for Following Plant-Based Diets.利用证据映射来审视遵循植物性饮食的动机。
Curr Dev Nutr. 2020 Feb 5;4(3):nzaa013. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzaa013. eCollection 2020 Mar.
2
A qualitative examination of the motivations behind vegan, vegetarian, and omnivore diets in an Australian population.对澳大利亚人群中素食、素食和杂食饮食背后动机的定性研究。
Appetite. 2021 Dec 1;167:105614. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105614. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
3
Protein Adequacy, Plant Protein Proportion, and Main Plant Protein Sources Consumed Across Vegan, Vegetarian, Pescovegetarian, and Semivegetarian Diets: A Systematic Review.纯素食、素食、鱼素和半素食饮食中的蛋白质充足性、植物蛋白比例及主要摄入的植物蛋白来源:一项系统综述
J Nutr. 2025 Jan;155(1):153-167. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.07.033. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
4
Web-Based Recruitment and Survey Methodology to Maximize Response Rates from Followers of Popular Diets: the Adhering to Dietary Approaches for Personal Taste (ADAPT) Feasibility Survey.基于网络的招募与调查方法,以提高流行饮食追随者的回应率:个人口味饮食方法依从性(ADAPT)可行性调查
Curr Dev Nutr. 2018 Mar 13;2(5):nzy012. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzy012. eCollection 2018 May.
5
Green or clean? Perception of clean label plant-based products by omnivorous, vegan, vegetarian and flexitarian consumers.绿色还是清洁?杂食者、素食者、素食者和弹性素食者消费者对清洁标签植物基产品的看法。
Food Res Int. 2021 Nov;149:110652. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110652. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
6
Participant characteristics and self-reported weight status in a cross-sectional pilot survey of self-identified followers of popular diets: Adhering to Dietary Approaches for Personal Taste (ADAPT) Feasibility Survey.参与人群特征及自我报告体重状况在横断面流行饮食追随者自我识别的初步调查中:坚持个人口味饮食方法(ADAPT)可行性调查。
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Oct;23(15):2717-2727. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020001330. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
7
Dietary adherence and acceptability of five different diets, including vegan and vegetarian diets, for weight loss: The New DIETs study.包括纯素饮食和素食饮食在内的五种不同饮食用于减肥的饮食依从性和可接受性:新饮食研究
Eat Behav. 2015 Dec;19:33-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
8
Adherence and eating experiences differ between participants following a flexitarian diet including red meat or a vegetarian diet including plant-based meat alternatives: findings from a 10-week randomised dietary intervention trial.遵循包括红肉的弹性素食饮食或包括植物性肉类替代品的纯素饮食的参与者,其依从性和饮食体验存在差异:一项为期10周的随机饮食干预试验的结果。
Front Nutr. 2023 Jun 14;10:1174726. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1174726. eCollection 2023.
9
Randomization to plant-based dietary approaches leads to larger short-term improvements in Dietary Inflammatory Index scores and macronutrient intake compared with diets that contain meat.与含肉类的饮食相比,随机采用以植物为基础的饮食方式能在短期内使饮食炎症指数得分和常量营养素摄入量得到更大改善。
Nutr Res. 2015 Feb;35(2):97-106. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2014.11.007. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
10
Plant-based and vegetarian diets: an overview and definition of these dietary patterns.植物性饮食和素食饮食:这些饮食模式的概述与定义。
Eur J Nutr. 2023 Apr;62(3):1109-1121. doi: 10.1007/s00394-023-03086-z. Epub 2023 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Difference in Motives and Basic Health Behavior of 8799 Children and Adolescents Aged 10-19 Years Following a Vegan, Vegetarian, or Omnivorous Diet.8799名10至19岁遵循纯素、素食或杂食饮食的儿童和青少年的动机及基本健康行为差异
Curr Dev Nutr. 2025 Jun 23;9(7):107498. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.107498. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Perceived motivators and barriers to consuming a plant-based diet: a qualitative research study.食用植物性饮食的感知动机和障碍:一项定性研究
BMC Nutr. 2025 Jun 2;11(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s40795-025-01100-7.
3
Limited risks of nutrient deficiency and significant modelled health benefits of adherence to a moderate plant-based diet in French adults.

本文引用的文献

1
Association Between Plant-Based Dietary Patterns and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.植物性饮食模式与2型糖尿病风险之间的关联:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Oct 1;179(10):1335-1344. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2195.
2
The psychology of vegetarianism: Recent advances and future directions.素食主义心理学:最新进展与未来方向。
Appetite. 2018 Dec 1;131:125-138. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.09.011. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
3
Evaluating Whole Grain Intervention Study Designs and Reporting Practices Using Evidence Mapping Methodology.
法国成年人中,营养缺乏风险有限,坚持适度的植物性饮食对健康有显著的模拟益处。
Eur J Nutr. 2025 Jun 1;64(5):200. doi: 10.1007/s00394-025-03714-w.
4
The Role of Plant-Based Beverages in Nutrition: An Expert Opinion.植物性饮料在营养中的作用:专家意见
Nutrients. 2025 Apr 30;17(9):1562. doi: 10.3390/nu17091562.
5
Explanatory AI Predicts the Diet Adopted Based on Nutritional and Lifestyle Habits in the Spanish Population.解释性人工智能根据西班牙人群的营养和生活方式习惯预测其采用的饮食。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2025 Jan 24;15(2):11. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe15020011.
6
Assessing the Roles of Retinol, Vitamin K2, Carnitine, and Creatine in Plant-Based Diets: A Narrative Review of Nutritional Adequacy and Health Implications.评估视黄醇、维生素K2、肉碱和肌酸在植物性饮食中的作用:营养充足性及对健康影响的叙述性综述
Nutrients. 2025 Jan 31;17(3):525. doi: 10.3390/nu17030525.
7
The Impact of Vegan and Vegetarian Diets on Wound Healing: A Scoping Review.纯素饮食和素食对伤口愈合的影响:一项范围综述
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Feb 3. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-04698-y.
8
Californian Public University Students' Attitudes, Beliefs, and Barriers to Plant-Based Nutrition.加利福尼亚州立大学学生对植物性营养的态度、信念及障碍
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2024 Dec 1:15598276241303700. doi: 10.1177/15598276241303700.
9
Socio-demographic determinants of dietary choices and their impact on health in Spanish adults.社会人口统计学因素对西班牙成年人饮食选择的影响及其对健康的影响。
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 7;12:1417925. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1417925. eCollection 2024.
10
Vegetarian dietary patterns and cardiovascular risk factors and disease prevention: An umbrella review of systematic reviews.素食饮食模式与心血管危险因素及疾病预防:系统评价的伞状综述
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2024 Sep 28;20:100868. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100868. eCollection 2024 Dec.
采用证据图谱方法评估全谷物干预研究设计和报告实践。
Nutrients. 2018 Aug 9;10(8):1052. doi: 10.3390/nu10081052.
4
Web-Based Recruitment and Survey Methodology to Maximize Response Rates from Followers of Popular Diets: the Adhering to Dietary Approaches for Personal Taste (ADAPT) Feasibility Survey.基于网络的招募与调查方法,以提高流行饮食追随者的回应率:个人口味饮食方法依从性(ADAPT)可行性调查
Curr Dev Nutr. 2018 Mar 13;2(5):nzy012. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzy012. eCollection 2018 May.
5
Gauging attitudes and behaviours: Meat consumption and potential reduction.评估态度和行为:肉类消费和潜在减少。
Appetite. 2018 Aug 1;127:230-241. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.04.015. Epub 2018 May 8.
6
A Comparison of Eating Attitudes Between Vegans/Vegetarians and Nonvegans/Nonvegetarians in Terms of Orthorexia Nervosa.纯素食者/素食者与非纯素食者/非素食者在正食症方面的饮食态度比较
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2018 Apr;32(2):200-205. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
7
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire: A comparison of five factor solutions across vegan and omnivore participants.验证性因子分析的饮食失调检查问卷:五因素解决方案比较纯素食者和杂食者参与者。
Int J Eat Disord. 2018 May;51(5):418-428. doi: 10.1002/eat.22848. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
8
Environmental Impacts of Plant-Based Diets: How Does Organic Food Consumption Contribute to Environmental Sustainability?植物性饮食的环境影响:有机食品消费如何促进环境可持续性?
Front Nutr. 2018 Feb 9;5:8. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2018.00008. eCollection 2018.
9
Lifestyle Medicine: A Brief Review of Its Dramatic Impact on Health and Survival.生活方式医学:对健康与生存的显著影响简述
Perm J. 2018;22:17-025. doi: 10.7812/TPP/17-025.
10
Comparison of Sociodemographic and Nutritional Characteristics between Self-Reported Vegetarians, Vegans, and Meat-Eaters from the NutriNet-Santé Study.《NutriNet-Santé 研究中自报素食者、严格素食者和肉食者的社会人口学和营养特征比较》
Nutrients. 2017 Sep 15;9(9):1023. doi: 10.3390/nu9091023.