Suppr超能文献

包括纯素饮食和素食饮食在内的五种不同饮食用于减肥的饮食依从性和可接受性:新饮食研究

Dietary adherence and acceptability of five different diets, including vegan and vegetarian diets, for weight loss: The New DIETs study.

作者信息

Moore Wendy J, McGrievy Michael E, Turner-McGrievy Gabrielle M

机构信息

University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Discovery I, 915 Greene Street, Room 535, Columbia, SC 29208, United States.

University of Akron, Department of Statistics, 302 East Buchtel Avenue, Akron, OH 44325, United States.

出版信息

Eat Behav. 2015 Dec;19:33-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jul 2.

Abstract

The goal of the present study was to examine dietary adherence and acceptability among participants from the New DIETs study who were randomized to one of four plant-based diets (vegan, vegetarian, pesco-vegetarian, semi-vegetarian) or an omnivore diet. Primary outcomes at two- and six months included dietary adherence (24-hour dietary recalls), weight loss and changes in animal product intake (mg cholesterol) by adherence status, Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ), Power of Food Scale (PFS), dietary acceptability (Food Acceptability Questionnaire), and impact of diet preference on adherence. No differences were found in dietary adherence or changes in FAQ, TFEQ, or PFS among the groups. At six months, non-adherent vegan and vegetarian participants (n=16) had a significantly greater decrease in cholesterol intake (-190.2 ± 199.2 mg) than non-adherent pesco-vegetarian/semi-vegetarian (n=15, -2.3 ± 200.3 mg, P=0.02) or omnivore participants (n=7, 17.0 ± 36.0, P=0.04). Non-adherent vegan/vegetarian participants lost significantly more weight at six months (-6.0 ± 6.7%) than non-adherent omnivore participants (-0.4 ± 0.6%, P=0.04). Dietary preference had no impact on adherence at six months. Due to equal rates of adherence and acceptability among the diet groups, instructing participants to follow vegan or vegetarian diets may have a greater impact on weight loss and animal product intake than providing instruction in more moderate approaches even among non-adherent participants.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查新饮食研究中被随机分配到四种植物性饮食(纯素食、素食、鱼素、半素食)或杂食性饮食之一的参与者的饮食依从性和可接受性。两个月和六个月时的主要结局包括饮食依从性(24小时饮食回忆)、体重减轻以及按依从状态划分的动物产品摄入量变化(毫克胆固醇)、三因素饮食问卷(TFEQ)、食物力量量表(PFS)、饮食可接受性(食物可接受性问卷)以及饮食偏好对依从性的影响。各组之间在饮食依从性或FAQ、TFEQ或PFS的变化方面未发现差异。在六个月时,未坚持纯素食和素食的参与者(n = 16)的胆固醇摄入量下降幅度(-190.2 ± 199.2毫克)显著大于未坚持鱼素/半素食的参与者(n = 15,-2.3 ± 200.3毫克,P = 0.02)或杂食性参与者(n = 7,17.0 ± 36.0,P = 0.04)。未坚持纯素食/素食的参与者在六个月时体重减轻幅度(-6.0 ± 6.7%)显著大于未坚持杂食性饮食的参与者(-0.4 ± 0.6%,P = 0.04)。饮食偏好在六个月时对依从性没有影响。由于各饮食组的依从性和可接受性比率相同,因此指导参与者遵循纯素食或素食饮食可能比以更温和的方式提供指导对体重减轻和动物产品摄入量有更大影响,即使在未坚持的参与者中也是如此。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验