Hargreaves Shila Minari, Rosenfeld Daniel L, Moreira Ana Vládia Bandeira, Zandonadi Renata Puppin
Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Brasilia (UnB), Campus Darcy Ribeiro, Asa Norte, Brasilia, DF, 70910-900, Brazil.
Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, 1285 Franz Hall, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Eur J Nutr. 2023 Apr;62(3):1109-1121. doi: 10.1007/s00394-023-03086-z. Epub 2023 Jan 22.
PURPOSE: This paper aims to present an overview of the definitions of "plant-based and "vegetarian diets" adopted by different organizations worldwide, proposing new standard definitions and discussing the notion of vegetarianism as a restrictive dietary pattern. METHODS: An extensive literature review on the different definitions of vegetarian and plant-based diets was conducted. Definitions of different international vegetarian and vegan organizations were also taken into account. Objective definitions for vegetarian and plant-based diets, as well as for their subcategories, were proposed. Other aspects related to how vegetarian diets are viewed and defined were also discussed. RESULTS: We proposed that a vegetarian diet should be defined as "a dietary pattern that excludes meat, meat-derived foods, and, to different extents, other animal products". This definition would include, among others, ovolactovegetarian and vegan diets. The proposed definition for a plant-based diet was "a dietary pattern in which foods of animal origin are totally or mostly excluded". Other types of diets, such as flexitarian and pescetarian diets, could be considered plant-based. A vegetarian diet should not be considered restrictive. Instead, terms such as alternative or non-conventional could be used to define it and to distinguish it from the conventional diet adopted by most of the Western population. CONCLUSION: This paper was able to elaborate objective definitions of vegetarian and plant-based diets. Standardizing nomenclatures may reduce misinterpretation and confusion in this field of study.
目的:本文旨在概述全球不同组织采用的“植物性饮食”和“素食饮食”的定义,提出新的标准定义,并讨论素食主义作为一种限制性饮食模式的概念。 方法:对素食和植物性饮食的不同定义进行了广泛的文献综述。还考虑了不同国际素食和纯素组织的定义。提出了素食和植物性饮食及其子类别的客观定义。还讨论了与素食饮食如何被看待和定义相关的其他方面。 结果:我们建议素食饮食应定义为“一种排除肉类、肉类衍生食品以及在不同程度上排除其他动物产品的饮食模式”。这一定义尤其包括蛋奶素食和纯素饮食。提出的植物性饮食定义为“一种完全或大部分排除动物源性食品的饮食模式”。其他类型的饮食,如弹性素食和鱼素饮食,可被视为植物性饮食。素食饮食不应被视为限制性饮食。相反,可以使用替代或非常规等术语来定义它,并将其与大多数西方人群采用的传统饮食区分开来。 结论:本文能够阐述素食和植物性饮食的客观定义。规范术语可能会减少该研究领域的误解和混淆。
Paediatr Int Child Health. 2023-11
J Health Popul Nutr. 2023-11-23
Adv Nutr. 2019-11-1
Can J Diet Pract Res. 2003
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2020-4-3
Immunity. 2019-11-19
Adv Nutr. 2019-11-1