• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

第二支 EMS 反应时间是否会影响多层次系统中 OHCA 的结局?一项全国性观察研究。

Does second EMS unit response time affect outcomes of OHCA in multi-tiered system? A nationwide observational study.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Republic of Korea.

Laboratory of Emergency Medical Services, Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Republic of Korea; Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Apr;42:161-167. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.02.018. Epub 2020 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2020.02.018
PMID:32111405
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The time dependence of a multi-tier response for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the time-dependent effect of EMS response type in a multi-tiered system on the clinical outcomes of OHCA.

METHODS

Adult EMS-treated OHCA of presumed cardiac etiology who were not witnessed by EMS between January 2015 and December 2017 were included. The main exposure was EMS response type: single-tier response, early multi-tier response (0-18 min from call to second EMS arrival), and late multi-tier response (19 min from call to second EMS arrival). The primary outcome was good neurologic recovery at the time of discharge from the hospital. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed, adjusting for patient-community and prehospital variables.

RESULTS

Among 54,436 patients, 29,995 patients (55.1%), 21,552 patients (39.6%), and 2889 patients (5.3%) were treated by single-tiered EMS, early multi-tiered EMS, and late multi-tiered EMS, respectively. Good neurological recovery and survival to discharge were more frequent in the early multi-tiered response group (6.4% and 9.7%) than in the single-tiered response group (4.8% and 7.5%) or late multi-tiered response group (3.1% and 5.8%). Compared to the single-tiered response group, the early multi-tiered response group was more likely to have good neurological recovery (adjusted OR, 95% CI: 1.15 [1.06-1.26]), but the late multi-tiered response group was less likely to have good neurological recovery (adjusted OR, 95% CI: 0.76 [0.61-0.96]).

CONCLUSION

In our basic to intermediate-tiered EMS system, early multi-tier response was associated with improved survival and good neurological recovery.

摘要

目的

院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的多梯次反应的时间依赖性尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估多层次系统中 EMS 反应类型的时间依赖性对 OHCA 临床结局的影响。

方法

纳入 2015 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月间 EMS 治疗的、假定为心源性的成人 OHCA 患者,这些患者在 EMS 到达前未被 EMS 目击。主要暴露因素为 EMS 反应类型:单梯次反应、早期多梯次反应(从接到电话到第二次 EMS 到达的 0-18 分钟)和晚期多梯次反应(从接到电话到第二次 EMS 到达的 19 分钟)。主要结局是出院时的良好神经功能恢复。采用多变量逻辑回归分析,调整患者-社区和院前变量。

结果

在 54436 例患者中,分别有 29995 例(55.1%)、21552 例(39.6%)和 2889 例(5.3%)接受了单梯次 EMS、早期多梯次 EMS 和晚期多梯次 EMS 治疗。早期多梯次反应组的良好神经功能恢复和出院存活率(分别为 6.4%和 9.7%)高于单梯次反应组(分别为 4.8%和 7.5%)或晚期多梯次反应组(分别为 3.1%和 5.8%)。与单梯次反应组相比,早期多梯次反应组更有可能实现良好的神经功能恢复(调整后的比值比,95%置信区间:1.15[1.06-1.26]),而晚期多梯次反应组则不太可能实现良好的神经功能恢复(调整后的比值比,95%置信区间:0.76[0.61-0.96])。

结论

在我们的基本到中级 EMS 系统中,早期多梯次反应与提高生存率和良好的神经功能恢复相关。

相似文献

1
Does second EMS unit response time affect outcomes of OHCA in multi-tiered system? A nationwide observational study.第二支 EMS 反应时间是否会影响多层次系统中 OHCA 的结局?一项全国性观察研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Apr;42:161-167. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.02.018. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
2
Early advanced life support attendance is associated with improved survival and neurologic outcomes after non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a tiered prehospital response system.在分层的院前反应系统中,早期高级生命支持的参与与非创伤性院外心脏骤停后的生存率和神经功能结局改善相关。
Resuscitation. 2019 Feb;135:137-144. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.12.003. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
3
Effect of Implementation of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation-Targeted Multi-Tier Response System on Outcomes After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Before-and-After Population-Based Study.心肺复苏靶向多层反应系统实施对院外心脏骤停后结局的影响:一项基于人群的前后对照研究。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2020 Mar-Apr;24(2):220-231. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1624900. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
4
Effects of dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation on neurological recovery in paediatric patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest based on the pre-hospital emergency medical service response time interval.基于院前急救反应时间间隔的调度员辅助旁观者心肺复苏对院外心脏骤停患儿神经功能恢复的影响。
Resuscitation. 2018 Sep;130:49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.06.029. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
5
Location of arrest and effect of prehospital advanced airway management after emergency medical service-witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: nationwide observational study.急救医疗服务目击者院外心搏骤停后逮捕地点和院前高级气道管理效果:全国性观察研究。
Emerg Med J. 2019 Sep;36(9):541-547. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-207871. Epub 2019 Jul 20.
6
Prehospital Advanced Cardiac Life Support for Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Cohort Study.院外心脏骤停的院前高级心脏生命支持:一项队列研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;24(9):1100-1109. doi: 10.1111/acem.13246. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
7
Neurological outcomes in patients transported to hospital without a prehospital return of spontaneous circulation after cardiac arrest.心脏骤停后未在院前恢复自主循环而被转运至医院的患者的神经学转归
Crit Care. 2013 Nov 20;17(6):R274. doi: 10.1186/cc13121.
8
Advanced vs. Basic Life Support in the Treatment of Out-of-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Arrest in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium.复苏结果联盟中院外心搏骤停的高级与基础生命支持治疗。
Resuscitation. 2018 Jul;128:132-137. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.04.031. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
9
Association of Prehospital Advanced Life Support by Physician With Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest With Blunt Trauma Following Traffic Collisions: Japanese Registry-Based Study.交通碰撞后钝器创伤致院外心脏骤停患者的院前高级生命支持与生存的相关性:日本注册研究。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Jun 20;153(6):e180674. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0674.
10
Effect of detection time interval for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest on outcomes in dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A nationwide observational study.院外心脏骤停检测时间间隔对调度员辅助心肺复苏结局的影响:一项全国性观察研究。
Resuscitation. 2018 Aug;129:61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
[Arrival times of emergency services in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest-Survival-relevant differences between federal states in Germany].[德国院外心脏骤停时紧急服务的到达时间——联邦州之间与生存相关的差异]
Anaesthesiologie. 2025 Sep 16. doi: 10.1007/s00101-025-01592-9.
2
Effects of Emergency Medical Service Response Time on Survival Rate of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients: a 5-Year Retrospective Study.紧急医疗服务响应时间对院外心脏骤停患者生存率的影响:一项5年回顾性研究。
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Feb 25;13(1):e36. doi: 10.22037/aaemj.v13i1.2596. eCollection 2025.
3
Understanding EMS response times: a machine learning-based analysis.
了解急救医疗服务响应时间:基于机器学习的分析
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Mar 24;25(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02975-z.
4
Comparative Efficacy of Extracorporeal Versus Conventional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Adult Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Study at a Single Center.体外心肺复苏与传统心肺复苏对成人院外难治性心脏骤停的疗效比较:一项单中心回顾性研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 15;14(2):513. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020513.
5
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review.2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的院外心脏骤停:一项系统综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 8;11(2):189. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11020189.
6
The number and level of first-contact emergency medical services crew and clinical outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with dual dispatch response.双重调度响应的院外心脏骤停中首次接触急救医疗服务人员数量、级别与临床结局
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2022 Dec;9(4):314-322. doi: 10.15441/ceem.22.205. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
7
Application of Automated External Defibrillators in Motorcycle Ambulances in Thailand's Emergency Medical Services.自动体外除颤器在泰国紧急医疗服务的摩托车救护车中的应用。
Open Access Emerg Med. 2022 Apr 12;14:141-146. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S361335. eCollection 2022.
8
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Does rurality decrease chances of survival?院外心脏骤停:农村地区会降低生存几率吗?
Resusc Plus. 2022 Feb 1;9:100208. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100208. eCollection 2022 Mar.
9
Health Care Quality Improvement for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Retrospective Study Based on Propensity-Score Matching Analysis.基于倾向评分匹配分析的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死医疗质量改进的回顾性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 4;18(11):6045. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18116045.
10
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Implementation of High-Performance Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Outcomes.关于院外心脏骤停结局中实施高效心肺复苏的系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2021 May 13;10(10):2098. doi: 10.3390/jcm10102098.