• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[德国院外心脏骤停时紧急服务的到达时间——联邦州之间与生存相关的差异]

[Arrival times of emergency services in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest-Survival-relevant differences between federal states in Germany].

作者信息

Fischer Matthias, Harding Ulf, Genzwürker Harald, Seewald Stephan, Gretenkort Peter, Reifferscheid Florian

机构信息

Arbeitsgemeinschaft Südwestdeutscher Notärztinnen und Notärzte e. V. (AGSWN), Filderstadt, Deutschland.

DRK Göppingen, Göppingen, Deutschland.

出版信息

Anaesthesiologie. 2025 Sep 16. doi: 10.1007/s00101-025-01592-9.

DOI:10.1007/s00101-025-01592-9
PMID:40958064
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The response time ("Hilfsfrist") in Germany is an important planning parameter that determines the arrival times of emergency medical services and is regulated by state legislation. This study analyzes arrival times in the German federal states.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

The German Resuscitation Registry uniformly records arrival times for the first vehicle on the scene and the complete team (team arrival time: ambulance and emergency physician) nationwide. The statistical testing of the null hypothesis, equality between the federal states, was conducted using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Binary logistic regression analyses were used to examine the impact of arrival times on survival rates.

RESULTS

The null hypothesis had to be rejected (p < 0.001), indicating that arrival times differ between the federal states (first vehicle: mean arrival times ranged from 5.7 ± 2.6 min to 7.4 ± 3.5 min; 90th percentile: 9-13 min; team arrival time ranged from 8.6 ± 3.6 min to 11.9 ± 5.9 min; 90th percentile: 13-21 min; 2014-2024: n = 104,657; 201 ambulance services). In 10 out of 16 federal states, fewer than 80% of patients were reached by the first vehicle within 8 min. The regression analyses showed that longer arrival and team arrival times were negatively associated with good neurological recovery at discharge (team arrival time ≥ 12 min: odds ratio, OR =0.54, confidence interval, CI =0.39-0.75, p < 0.001; n = 45,873; 71 reference emergency medical services, EMS, sites).

CONCLUSION

Patients receive qualitatively different levels of care across the federal states due to variations in arrival times. Shorter arrival times are associated with better chances of survival. Equal quality of care is a constitutional requirement by the German constitution but it is not being achieved.

摘要

背景

德国的响应时间(“救助期限”)是一个重要的规划参数,它决定了紧急医疗服务的到达时间,并受州立法的规范。本研究分析了德国联邦各州的到达时间。

材料与方法

德国复苏登记处统一记录全国范围内第一辆车到达现场的时间以及完整团队(团队到达时间:救护车和急诊医生)的到达时间。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验对联邦各州之间无差异这一原假设进行统计检验。二元逻辑回归分析用于检验到达时间对生存率的影响。

结果

原假设必须被拒绝(p < 0.001),这表明联邦各州之间的到达时间存在差异(第一辆车:平均到达时间从5.7±2.6分钟到7.4±3.5分钟;第90百分位数:9 - 13分钟;团队到达时间从8.6±3.6分钟到11.9±5.9分钟;第90百分位数:13 - 21分钟;2014 - 2024年:n = 104,657;201个救护服务)。在16个联邦州中的10个州,不到80%的患者在8分钟内被第一辆车送达。回归分析表明,更长的到达时间和团队到达时间与出院时良好的神经功能恢复呈负相关(团队到达时间≥12分钟:优势比,OR = 0.54,置信区间,CI = 0.39 - 0.75,p < 0.001;n = 45,873;71个参考紧急医疗服务站点)。

结论

由于到达时间的差异,联邦各州的患者接受的护理质量存在质的不同。更短的到达时间与更好的生存机会相关。平等的护理质量是德国宪法规定的要求,但并未实现。

相似文献

1
[Arrival times of emergency services in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest-Survival-relevant differences between federal states in Germany].[德国院外心脏骤停时紧急服务的到达时间——联邦州之间与生存相关的差异]
Anaesthesiologie. 2025 Sep 16. doi: 10.1007/s00101-025-01592-9.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Benefits, barriers and facilitators for out-of-hospital point of care testing: a qualitative study.院外即时检验的益处、障碍与促进因素:一项定性研究
NIHR Open Res. 2024 Jun 27;4:38. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13583.1. eCollection 2024.
4
Physician anaesthetists versus non-physician providers of anaesthesia for surgical patients.外科患者的麻醉:医师麻醉师与非医师麻醉提供者的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 11;2014(7):CD010357. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010357.pub2.
5
Continuous chest compression versus interrupted chest compression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation of non-asphyxial out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.持续胸外按压与间断胸外按压用于非窒息性院外心脏骤停心肺复苏的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 27;3(3):CD010134. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010134.pub2.
6
Community First Responders' role in the current and future rural health and care workforce: a mixed-methods study.社区第一响应者在当前和未来农村卫生和保健劳动力中的作用:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(18):1-101. doi: 10.3310/JYRT8674.
7
A rapid mixed-methods evaluation of remote home monitoring models during the COVID-19 pandemic in England.英格兰 COVID-19 大流行期间远程家庭监护模式的快速混合方法评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(13):1-151. doi: 10.3310/FVQW4410.
8
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
9
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.

本文引用的文献

1
Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcome reports: 2024 update of the Utstein Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Registry template.心脏骤停和心肺复苏结果报告:2024 年乌斯丁院外心脏骤停登记模板更新。
Resuscitation. 2024 Aug;201:110288. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110288. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
2
Dynamic ambulance relocation: a scoping review.动态救护车调配:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 14;13(12):e073394. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073394.
3
Smartphone-activated volunteer responders and bystander defibrillation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in private homes and public locations.
智能手机激活的志愿者响应者和旁观者在私人住宅和公共场所对院外心脏骤停的除颤。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2023 Feb 9;12(2):87-95. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuac165.
4
Increased bystander intervention when volunteer responders attend out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.当志愿者急救人员参与院外心脏骤停急救时旁观者干预增加。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 4;9:1030843. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1030843. eCollection 2022.
5
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Systems saving lives.《2021年欧洲复苏委员会指南:拯救生命的系统》
Resuscitation. 2021 Apr;161:80-97. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.008. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
6
Shortening Ambulance Response Time Increases Survival in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.缩短救护车反应时间可提高院外心脏骤停患者的存活率。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Nov 3;9(21):e017048. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017048. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
7
Does second EMS unit response time affect outcomes of OHCA in multi-tiered system? A nationwide observational study.第二支 EMS 反应时间是否会影响多层次系统中 OHCA 的结局?一项全国性观察研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Apr;42:161-167. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.02.018. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
8
Benefits of adding a physician-staffed ambulance to bystander-witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a community-based, observational study in Niigata, Japan.为旁观者目睹的院外心脏骤停患者增加配备医师的救护车的益处:一项在日本新潟进行的基于社区的观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 26;9(11):e032967. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032967.
9
CaRdiac Arrest Survival Score (CRASS) - A tool to predict good neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.心脏骤停后生存评分(CRASS)——一种预测院外心脏骤停后良好神经结局的工具。
Resuscitation. 2020 Jan 1;146:66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.10.036. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
10
Early advanced life support attendance is associated with improved survival and neurologic outcomes after non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a tiered prehospital response system.在分层的院前反应系统中,早期高级生命支持的参与与非创伤性院外心脏骤停后的生存率和神经功能结局改善相关。
Resuscitation. 2019 Feb;135:137-144. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.12.003. Epub 2018 Dec 18.