Shajari Mehdi, Priglinger Siegfried, Kreutzer Thomas
Augenklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Mathildenstr. 8, 80336, München, Deutschland.
Ophthalmologe. 2020 Mar;117(3):283-292. doi: 10.1007/s00347-020-01059-9.
Patients undergoing lens surgery nowadays have the option to choose between different intraocular lens (IOL) options depending on the ocular situation and personal preferences. For example, it is possible to implant a toric IOL to compensate for extensive corneal distortion or a multifocal IOL to have good visual acuity at various distances. The high level of competition in the lens market leads to fast development of new lens models giving patients the advantage to choose between a variety of options. This review article presents the most commonly used premium IOL options namely, aspheric, toric and multifocal IOLs and a summary of the current study situation for the different lens types. Compared to standard lenses, these lenses can improve uncorrected distance and near visual acuity; however, in some patients the added benefit can be only marginal and this is then an unnecessary cost factor for the patient. Furthermore, if inclusion and exclusion criteria are not respected the special forms of lenses can even lead to a poorer overall result.
如今,接受晶状体手术的患者可以根据眼部情况和个人喜好在不同的人工晶状体(IOL)选项之间进行选择。例如,可以植入一枚 toric 人工晶状体来补偿严重的角膜变形,或者植入一枚多焦点人工晶状体以在不同距离下都有良好的视力。晶状体市场的高度竞争导致新晶状体模型快速发展,使患者能够在多种选项中进行选择。这篇综述文章介绍了最常用的高端人工晶状体选项,即非球面、toric 和多焦点人工晶状体,并总结了不同晶状体类型的当前研究情况。与标准晶状体相比,这些晶状体可以改善未矫正的远视力和近视力;然而,在一些患者中,额外的益处可能微乎其微,这对患者来说就成了不必要的成本因素。此外,如果不遵守纳入和排除标准,特殊类型的晶状体甚至可能导致总体结果更差。