• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直肠癌微创手术的演变:来自国家癌症数据库的最新更新。

Evolution of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: update from the national cancer database.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Duke University Medical Center, Box 3443, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2021 Jan;35(1):275-290. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07393-y. Epub 2020 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-020-07393-y
PMID:32112255
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As the use of minimally invasive techniques in colorectal surgery has become increasingly prevalent, concerns remain about the oncologic effectiveness and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive low anterior resection (MI-LAR) for the treatment of rectal cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

The 2010-2015 National Cancer Database (NCDB) Participant Data Use File was queried for patients undergoing elective open LAR (OLAR) or MI-LAR for rectal adenocarcinoma. A 1:1 propensity match was performed on the basis of demographics, comorbidity, and tumor characteristics. Outcomes were compared between groups and Cox proportional hazard modeling was performed to identify independent predictors of mortality. A subset analysis was performed on high-volume academic centers.

RESULTS

35,809 patients undergoing LAR were identified of whom 18,265 (51.0%) underwent MI-LAR. After propensity matching, patients receiving MI-LAR were less likely to have a positive circumferential radial margin (CRM) (5.5% vs. 6.6%, p = 0.0094) or a positive distal margin (3.6% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.0022) and had decreased 90-day all-cause mortality (2.0% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.0238). MI-LAR resulted in decreased hospital length of stay (5 vs. 6 days, p < 0.0001) but a greater rate of 30-day readmission (7.6% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.0054). Long-term overall survival was improved with MI-LAR (79% vs. 76%, p < 0.0001). Cox proportional hazard modeling demonstrated a decreased risk of mortality with MI-LAR (HR 0.859, 95% CI 0.788-0.937).

CONCLUSION

MI-LAR is associated with improvement in CRM clearance and long-term survival. In the hands of experienced surgeons with advanced laparoscopy skills, MI-LAR appears safe and effective technique for the management of rectal cancer.

摘要

背景

随着微创技术在结直肠手术中的应用越来越普遍,人们仍然对微创低位前切除术(MI-LAR)治疗直肠癌的肿瘤学效果和长期结果存在担忧。

研究设计

从 2010 年至 2015 年国家癌症数据库(NCDB)参与者数据使用文件中查询接受选择性开放低位前切除术(OLAR)或 MI-LAR 治疗直肠腺癌的患者。根据人口统计学、合并症和肿瘤特征进行 1:1 倾向匹配。比较两组之间的结果,并进行 Cox 比例风险模型分析以确定死亡率的独立预测因素。对高容量学术中心进行了亚组分析。

结果

共确定 35809 例接受 LAR 的患者,其中 18265 例(51.0%)接受 MI-LAR。在倾向匹配后,接受 MI-LAR 的患者更不可能有阳性环周径向切缘(CRM)(5.5% vs. 6.6%,p = 0.0094)或阳性远端切缘(3.6% vs. 4.6%,p = 0.0022),且 90 天全因死亡率降低(2.0% vs. 2.6%,p = 0.0238)。MI-LAR 导致住院时间缩短(5 天 vs. 6 天,p<0.0001),但 30 天再入院率增加(7.6% vs. 6.5%,p = 0.0054)。MI-LAR 改善了长期总体生存率(79% vs. 76%,p<0.0001)。Cox 比例风险模型显示 MI-LAR 降低了死亡率风险(HR 0.859,95%CI 0.788-0.937)。

结论

MI-LAR 与 CRM 清除率的提高和长期生存有关。在具有先进腹腔镜技能的经验丰富的外科医生手中,MI-LAR 似乎是一种安全有效的直肠癌治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Evolution of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: update from the national cancer database.直肠癌微创手术的演变:来自国家癌症数据库的最新更新。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jan;35(1):275-290. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07393-y. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
2
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Low Anterior Resection: Equivalent Survival in a National Analysis of 14,033 Patients With Rectal Cancer.微创与开放低位前切除术:对14033例直肠癌患者的全国性分析显示生存率相当
Ann Surg. 2016 Jun;263(6):1152-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001388.
3
Outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection compared to open: a propensity-matched analysis of the NCDB (2010-2015).比较腹腔镜或机器人低位前切除术与开放手术治疗直肠癌患者的结局:NCDB(2010-2015 年)的倾向匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Nov;34(11):4754-4771. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07252-5. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
4
Impact of surgical approach on short-term oncological outcomes and recovery following low anterior resection for rectal cancer.手术入路对直肠癌低位前切除术后短期肿瘤学结果和恢复的影响。
Colorectal Dis. 2019 Aug;21(8):932-942. doi: 10.1111/codi.14677. Epub 2019 May 25.
5
Multicentre propensity score-matched analysis of laparoscopic versus open surgery for T4 rectal cancer.T4期直肠癌腹腔镜手术与开放手术的多中心倾向评分匹配分析
Surg Endosc. 2017 Aug;31(8):3106-3121. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5332-9. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
6
Minimally Invasive Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: A National Perspective on Short-term Outcomes and Morbidity.直肠癌的微创直肠切除术:全国范围内对短期结果和发病率的观察。
World J Surg. 2020 Sep;44(9):3130-3140. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05560-9.
7
Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit Data.微创与开放直肠切除术治疗直肠癌的结果:基于两国结直肠癌症审核数据的倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Jun;63(6):778-787. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001654.
8
Laparoscopic versus open low anterior resection for rectal cancer: results from the national cancer data base.腹腔镜与开放手术行直肠癌低位前切除术:来自国家癌症数据库的结果
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Jan;19(1):124-31; discussion 131-2. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2614-1. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
9
Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.微创直肠癌切除术相较于开放性切除术具有更好的病理和临床结果。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3435-3448. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07120-2. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
10
Comparing pathologic outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic Surgery in rectal cancer resection: a propensity adjusted analysis of 7616 patients.比较直肠癌切除术中机器人手术与腹腔镜手术的病理结果:7616 例患者的倾向调整分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jun;34(6):2613-2622. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07032-1. Epub 2019 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of short-term outcomes for robotic rectal surgery between the hinotori™ surgical robot system and da Vinci surgical system: a single-center retrospective study using propensity score matching analysis.Hinotori™手术机器人系统与达芬奇手术系统在机器人直肠手术短期结局的比较:一项使用倾向评分匹配分析的单中心回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2025 May 2. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11766-6.
2
Robotic-assisted surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes: the Mayo Clinic experience.超出全直肠系膜切除平面的局部晚期直肠癌的机器人辅助手术:梅奥诊所的经验
Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2498-2505. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11634-3. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic rectal resection versus open rectal resection with minilaparotomy for invasive rectal cancer.腹腔镜直肠切除术与小切口开腹直肠切除术治疗浸润性直肠癌的比较。
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2014 Feb;5(1):36-45. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2013.052.
Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a prospective clinical trial and comparative analysis.
腹腔镜下细胞减灭术和腹腔内热化疗:一项前瞻性临床试验及对比分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37(7):5644-5651. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09589-w. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
4
Nomogram for prediction of prolonged postoperative ileus after colorectal resection.用于预测结直肠切除术后长时间术后肠梗阻的列线图。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Dec 6;22(1):1273. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10377-x.
5
Outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: propensity-matched analysis of the National Clinical Database in Japan.机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜低位前切除术治疗直肠癌患者的结局比较:来自日本国家临床数据库的倾向性匹配分析。
BJS Open. 2021 Sep 6;5(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab083.
6
Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in Korea: Nationwide Data from 2013 to 2018.韩国结直肠肿瘤腹腔镜手术的全国数据:2013-2018 年
Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jul;52(3):938-944. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.043. Epub 2020 Apr 6.