School of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa.
Division of Clinical Anatomy and Biological Anthropology, Department of Human Biology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
J Comp Neurol. 2020 Dec 1;528(17):2994-3007. doi: 10.1002/cne.24895. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
We quantified both proliferative (Ki-67 immunohistochemistry) and immature (doublecortin immunohistochemistry) cells within the dentate gyrus of adult Egyptian fruit bats from three distinct environments: (a) primary rainforest, (b) subtropical woodland, and (c) fifth-generation captive-bred. We used four different previously reported methods to assess the effect of the environment on proliferative and immature cells: (a) the comparison of raw totals of proliferative and immature cells; (b) these totals standardized to brain mass; (c) these totals expressed as a density using the volume of the granular cell layer (GCLv) for standardization; and (d) these totals expressed as a percentage of the total number of granule cells. For all methods, the numbers of proliferative cells did not differ statistically among the three groups, indicating that the rate of proliferation, while malleable to experimental manipulation or transiently in response to events of importance in the natural habitat, appears to occur, for the most part, at a predetermined rate within a species. For the immature cells, raw numbers and standardizations to brain mass and GCLv revealed no difference between the three groups studied; however, standardization to total granule cell numbers indicated that the two groups of wild-caught bats had significantly higher numbers of immature neurons than the captive-bred bats. These contrasting results indicate that the interpretation of the effect of the environment on the numbers of immature neurons appears method dependent. It is possible that current methods are not sensitive enough to reveal the effect of different environments on proliferative and immature cells.
我们在三种不同的环境中量化了成年埃及果蝠齿状回中的增殖(Ki-67 免疫组化)和未成熟(双皮质素免疫组化)细胞:(a)原始雨林,(b)亚热带林地,和(c)第五代圈养繁殖。我们使用了四种不同的先前报道的方法来评估环境对增殖和未成熟细胞的影响:(a)比较增殖和未成熟细胞的原始总数;(b)将这些总数标准化为脑质量;(c)使用颗粒细胞层(GCLv)的体积标准化这些总数作为密度;(d)将这些总数表示为总颗粒细胞数的百分比。对于所有方法,三组之间的增殖细胞数量在统计学上没有差异,这表明增殖率虽然可以通过实验操作或对自然栖息地中重要事件的短暂反应来改变,但在很大程度上是在物种内以预定的速度发生的。对于未成熟细胞,原始数量和脑质量以及 GCLv 的标准化没有显示三组之间有差异;然而,总颗粒细胞数量的标准化表明,两组野生捕获的蝙蝠的未成熟神经元数量明显高于圈养繁殖的蝙蝠。这些对比结果表明,环境对未成熟神经元数量的影响的解释似乎取决于方法。目前的方法可能不够敏感,无法揭示不同环境对增殖和未成熟细胞的影响。