Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Am J Hematol. 2020 Jun;95(6):612-622. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25769. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
Acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) is a heterogeneous disorder defined by multilineage dysplasia, myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)-related karyotype, or history of prior MDS. We evaluated 415 patients with AML-MRC treated from 2013 to 2018 and analyzed their clinical outcomes based on the diagnostic criteria of AML-MRC, therapy type and mutation profile. Criteria for AML-MRC included: cytogenetic abnormalities (AML-MRC-C) in 243 (59%), prior history of MDS in 75 (18%) including 47 (11%) with previously untreated MDS (AML-MRC-H) and 28 (7%) with previously treated MDS (AML-MRC-TS), and 97 (23%) with multilineage dysplasia (AML-MRC-M). Median age was 70 years (range 18-94). Among 95 evaluable patients, a total of 37 (39%) had secondary-type (ASXL1, BCOR, EZH2, SF3B1, SRSF2, STAG2, U2AF1, ZRSR2) mutations. Mutations in ASXL1, BCOR, SF3B1, SRSF2, and U2AF1 tended to appear in dominant clones. By multivariate analysis, AML-MRC subtype, age and serum LDH levels were independent predictors of outcome, with patients with AML-MRC-M (HR 0.56, CI 0.38-0.84, P = .004) and AML-MRC-H having better OS. Compared to a cohort of 468 patients with AML without MRC, patients with AML-MRC-M/AML-MRC-H had similar outcomes to those with intermediate risk AML by European LeukemiaNet criteria. Intensive therapy was associated with improved OS in patients with AML-MRC-M (HR 0.42, CI 0.19-0.94, P = .036) and with improved EFS in AML-MRC-M and AML-MRC-H (HR 0.26, CI 0.10-0.63, P = .003). This data suggests that not all diagnostic criteria for AML-MRC define high-risk patients and that specific subgroups may benefit from different therapeutic interventions.
伴骨髓增生异常相关改变的急性髓系白血病(AML-MRC)是一种异质性疾病,其定义为多系发育不良、骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)相关核型或既往 MDS 病史。我们评估了 2013 年至 2018 年期间接受治疗的 415 例 AML-MRC 患者,并根据 AML-MRC 的诊断标准、治疗类型和突变谱分析了他们的临床结局。AML-MRC 的标准包括:243 例(59%)存在细胞遗传学异常(AML-MRC-C),75 例(18%)存在既往 MDS 病史,其中 47 例(11%)为未经治疗的 MDS(AML-MRC-H),28 例(7%)为治疗过的 MDS(AML-MRC-TS),97 例(23%)存在多系发育不良(AML-MRC-M)。中位年龄为 70 岁(范围 18-94 岁)。在 95 例可评估的患者中,共有 37 例(39%)存在继发性(ASXL1、BCOR、EZH2、SF3B1、SRSF2、STAG2、U2AF1、ZRSR2)突变。ASXL1、BCOR、SF3B1、SRSF2 和 U2AF1 的突变倾向于出现在优势克隆中。多变量分析显示,AML-MRC 亚型、年龄和血清 LDH 水平是独立的预后预测因素,AML-MRC-M 患者(HR 0.56,CI 0.38-0.84,P = 0.004)和 AML-MRC-H 患者的 OS 更好。与 468 例无 MRC 的 AML 患者队列相比,AML-MRC-M/AML-MRC-H 患者的结局与欧洲白血病网(ELN)标准定义的中危 AML 患者相似。强化治疗与 AML-MRC-M 患者的 OS 改善相关(HR 0.42,CI 0.19-0.94,P = 0.036),与 AML-MRC-M 和 AML-MRC-H 的 EFS 改善相关(HR 0.26,CI 0.10-0.63,P = 0.003)。这些数据表明,并非 AML-MRC 的所有诊断标准都定义为高危患者,特定亚组可能受益于不同的治疗干预。