• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国慢性疼痛管理中硬膜外注射司法先例案例分析。

Analysis of judicial precedent cases regarding epidural injection in chronic pain management in Republic of Korea.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.

Department of Medical Law and Ethics, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 May;45(5):337-343. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-101169. Epub 2020 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1136/rapm-2019-101169
PMID:32114483
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although there is a low incidence of complications associated with epidural injections, pain physicians should still remain vigilant for potentially serious adverse outcomes. This study aimed to identify and describe the major complications of epidural injections.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational, medicolegal study analyzed closed cases of precedents involving complications of epidural injections from January 1997 to August 2019 using the database of the Supreme Court of Korea's judgement system. Clinical characteristics and judgement statuses were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 73 potential cases assessed for eligibility, a total of 49 malpractice cases were included in the final analysis. Thirty-three claims resulted in payments to the plaintiffs, with a median payment of US$103 828 (IQR: US$45 291-US$265 341). The most common complication was infection (n=13, 26.5%), followed by worsening pain (n=8, 16.3%). Physician malpractice before, during, and after the procedure was claimed by plaintiffs in 18 (36.7%), 44 (89.8%), and 31 (63.3%) cases, respectively. Of these cases, 6 (33.3%), 19 (43.2%), and 15 (48.4%), respectively, were adjudicated in favor of the plaintiffs by the courts. In cases involving postprocedural physician errors, the majority (13/15) of the plaintiff verdicts were related to delayed management. Violation of the physician's duty of informed consent was claimed by plaintiffs in 31 (63.3%) cases, and 14 (45.2%) of these cases were judged medical malpractice.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data will allow pain physicians to become acquainted with the major epidural injection-associated complications that underlie malpractice cases.

摘要

背景

虽然硬膜外注射相关并发症的发生率较低,但疼痛医师仍应保持警惕,以防发生潜在的严重不良后果。本研究旨在确定和描述硬膜外注射的主要并发症。

方法

本回顾性、观察性、法医学研究使用韩国最高法院判决系统的数据库,分析了 1997 年 1 月至 2019 年 8 月期间涉及硬膜外注射并发症的已决案例的封闭案例。分析了临床特征和判决状况。

结果

在评估的 73 个潜在案例中,共有 49 个医疗事故案例符合最终分析标准。33 项索赔导致向原告支付赔偿金,中位数为 103828 美元(IQR:45291-265341 美元)。最常见的并发症是感染(n=13,26.5%),其次是疼痛恶化(n=8,16.3%)。原告分别在术前、术中和术后声称医生存在医疗事故 18(36.7%)、44(89.8%)和 31(63.3%)例。其中,6(33.3%)、19(43.2%)和 15(48.4%)例被法庭判决有利于原告。在涉及术后医生失误的案例中,大多数(13/15)的原告裁决都与延迟管理有关。原告在 31(63.3%)例中声称医生违反了知情同意的义务,其中 14(45.2%)例被判定为医疗事故。

结论

我们的数据将使疼痛医师了解导致医疗事故的主要硬膜外注射相关并发症。

相似文献

1
Analysis of judicial precedent cases regarding epidural injection in chronic pain management in Republic of Korea.韩国慢性疼痛管理中硬膜外注射司法先例案例分析。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 May;45(5):337-343. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-101169. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
2
Descriptive Analysis of Federal and State Interventional Pain Malpractice Litigation in the United States: A Pilot Investigation.美国联邦和州干预性疼痛医疗过失诉讼的描述性分析:一项初步调查。
Pain Physician. 2020 Jul;23(4):413-422.
3
A Contemporary Medicolegal Analysis of Outpatient Interventional Pain Procedures: 2009-2016.当代门诊介入性疼痛治疗的法医学分析:2009-2016 年。
Anesth Analg. 2019 Jul;129(1):255-262. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004096.
4
Assessment of malpractice claims due to spinal epidural abscess.因脊柱硬膜外脓肿导致的医疗事故索赔评估。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Oct;27(4):476-480. doi: 10.3171/2016.12.SPINE16814. Epub 2017 May 12.
5
Analysis of endotracheal intubation-related judicial precedents in South Korea.韩国与气管插管相关的司法判例分析。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2021 Dec;74(6):506-513. doi: 10.4097/kja.21020. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
6
Medicolegal Consideration to Prevent Medical Malpractice Regarding Opioid Administration: An Analysis of Judicial Opinion in South Korea.预防阿片类药物给药医疗事故的法医学考量:韩国司法意见分析
J Pain Res. 2020 Jun 25;13:1525-1532. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S256759. eCollection 2020.
7
Deep Spinal Infection after Outpatient Epidural Injections for Pain: A Retrospective Sample Cohort Study Using a Claims Database in South Korea.门诊硬膜外注射治疗疼痛后发生深部脊髓感染:一项使用韩国索赔数据库的回顾性样本队列研究。
Anesthesiology. 2021 Jun 1;134(6):925-936. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003770.
8
An Analysis of Judicial Cases Concerning Analgesic-Related Medication Errors in the Republic of Korea.韩国阿片类药物相关用药差错司法案例分析。
J Patient Saf. 2022 Mar 1;18(2):e439-e446. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000834.
9
Physician and patients factors associated with outcome of spinal epidural abscess related malpractice litigation.与脊柱硬膜外脓肿相关医疗事故诉讼结果相关的医生和患者因素。
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2018 Sep 26;10(3):7693. doi: 10.4081/or.2018.7693. eCollection 2018 Sep 5.
10
Medico-legal implications for the colon perforation during colonoscopy.结肠镜检查致结肠穿孔的医学法律责任
J Forensic Leg Med. 2021 May;80:102185. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2021.102185. Epub 2021 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnosis and management of infections related to spinal pain interventions.与脊柱疼痛干预相关感染的诊断与管理
Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2024 Oct;19(4):294-301. doi: 10.17085/apm.24140. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
2
Analysis of endotracheal intubation-related judicial precedents in South Korea.韩国与气管插管相关的司法判例分析。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2021 Dec;74(6):506-513. doi: 10.4097/kja.21020. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
3
Medicolegal Consideration to Prevent Medical Malpractice Regarding Opioid Administration: An Analysis of Judicial Opinion in South Korea.
预防阿片类药物给药医疗事故的法医学考量:韩国司法意见分析
J Pain Res. 2020 Jun 25;13:1525-1532. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S256759. eCollection 2020.