• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国阿片类药物相关用药差错司法案例分析。

An Analysis of Judicial Cases Concerning Analgesic-Related Medication Errors in the Republic of Korea.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Seoul National University Hospital.

Department of Medical Law and Ethics, Graduate School, Yonsei University.

出版信息

J Patient Saf. 2022 Mar 1;18(2):e439-e446. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000834.

DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000000834
PMID:35188932
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Analgesic-related medication errors can be a threat to patient safety. This study aimed to identify and describe medication errors that can cause serious adverse drug events (ADEs) related to analgesic use.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational, medicolegal study analyzed closed cases concerning complications induced by medication errors involving 3 commonly used analgesics: opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and acetaminophen (AAP). Cases closed between 1994 and 2019 that were available in the Korean Supreme Court judgment database system were included. Medication errors were categorized using a classification system (developed by our group) based on the stage of drug administration. Clinical characteristics and judgment statuses were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 71 cases were included in the final analysis (opioids, n = 30; NSAIDs, n = 35; AAP, n = 6). Among them, 43 claims (60.6%) resulted in payments to the plaintiffs, with a median payment of $86,607 (interquartile range, $34,554-$193,782). The severity of ADEs was high (National Association of Insurance Commissioners scale ≥6) in 88.7% (n = 63) of claims, with a total of 44 (62%) deaths. The most common types of ADEs associated with opioid, NSAID, and AAP use were respiratory depression, anaphylactic shock, and fulminant hepatitis, respectively. The most common recognized medication errors associated with opioid, NSAIDs, and AAP were inappropriate patient monitoring (n = 10; 33.3%), improper analgesic choice (n = 15; 42.9%), and inappropriate treatment after ADEs (n = 3; 50%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that efforts should be made to reduce medication errors related to analgesic use to prevent permanent injury and potential malpractice claims.

摘要

目的

与镇痛相关的用药错误可能对患者安全构成威胁。本研究旨在确定和描述可能导致与镇痛使用相关的严重不良药物事件(ADE)的用药错误。

方法

本回顾性、观察性、医疗法律研究分析了涉及 3 种常用镇痛药(阿片类药物、非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)和对乙酰氨基酚(AAP))的用药错误引起的并发症的封闭病例。纳入了在韩国最高法院判决数据库系统中可获得的 1994 年至 2019 年期间结案的病例。用药错误使用我们小组开发的基于药物管理阶段的分类系统进行分类。分析了临床特征和判决状况。

结果

最终分析共纳入 71 例(阿片类药物 30 例,NSAIDs 35 例,AAP 6 例)。其中,43 项索赔(60.6%)导致向原告支付款项,中位数支付金额为 86607 美元(四分位距 34554-193782 美元)。ADE 的严重程度较高(国家保险专员协会量表≥6),占索赔的 88.7%(n=63),总共有 44 例(62%)死亡。与阿片类药物、NSAIDs 和 AAP 使用相关的最常见 ADE 类型分别为呼吸抑制、过敏性休克和暴发性肝炎。与阿片类药物、NSAIDs 和 AAP 相关的最常见识别出的用药错误分别为不适当的患者监测(n=10;33.3%)、不适当的镇痛选择(n=15;42.9%)和 ADE 后不适当的治疗(n=3;50%)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,应努力减少与镇痛使用相关的用药错误,以防止永久性伤害和潜在的医疗事故索赔。

相似文献

1
An Analysis of Judicial Cases Concerning Analgesic-Related Medication Errors in the Republic of Korea.韩国阿片类药物相关用药差错司法案例分析。
J Patient Saf. 2022 Mar 1;18(2):e439-e446. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000834.
2
Medicolegal Consideration to Prevent Medical Malpractice Regarding Opioid Administration: An Analysis of Judicial Opinion in South Korea.预防阿片类药物给药医疗事故的法医学考量:韩国司法意见分析
J Pain Res. 2020 Jun 25;13:1525-1532. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S256759. eCollection 2020.
3
A Contemporary Medicolegal Analysis of Outpatient Medication Management in Chronic Pain.慢性疼痛门诊药物管理的当代法医学分析
Anesth Analg. 2017 Nov;125(5):1761-1768. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002499.
4
Analysis of judicial precedent cases regarding epidural injection in chronic pain management in Republic of Korea.韩国慢性疼痛管理中硬膜外注射司法先例案例分析。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 May;45(5):337-343. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-101169. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
5
Analgesic-Related Medication Errors Reported to US Poison Control Centers.上报至美国毒物控制中心的与镇痛相关的用药差错报告。
Pain Med. 2018 Dec 1;19(12):2357-2370. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx272.
6
Analysis of medication-related malpractice claims: causes, preventability, and costs.药物相关医疗事故索赔分析:原因、可预防性及成本
Arch Intern Med. 2002 Nov 25;162(21):2414-20. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.21.2414.
7
A Contemporary Medicolegal Analysis of Outpatient Interventional Pain Procedures: 2009-2016.当代门诊介入性疼痛治疗的法医学分析:2009-2016 年。
Anesth Analg. 2019 Jul;129(1):255-262. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004096.
8
Analysis of endotracheal intubation-related judicial precedents in South Korea.韩国与气管插管相关的司法判例分析。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2021 Dec;74(6):506-513. doi: 10.4097/kja.21020. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
9
Prevalence and Seriousness of Analgesic-Induced Adverse Events in Korea: A 10-Year Nationwide Surveillance.韩国阿片类药物诱发的不良事件的流行率和严重程度:一项为期 10 年的全国性监测。
J Patient Saf. 2020 Dec;16(4):e215-e224. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000742.
10
What Adverse Events and Injuries Are Cited in Anesthesia Malpractice Claims for Nonspine Orthopaedic Surgery?非脊柱骨科手术麻醉医疗事故索赔中提到了哪些不良事件和损伤?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Dec;475(12):2941-2951. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5303-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Factors for Emergency Department Presentations after the Initiation of Opioid Analgesics in Non-Cancer Patients in Korea: A Nationwide Study.韩国非癌症患者开始使用阿片类镇痛药后急诊就诊的风险因素:一项全国性研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 7;59(3):519. doi: 10.3390/medicina59030519.