• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Analysis of endotracheal intubation-related judicial precedents in South Korea.韩国与气管插管相关的司法判例分析。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2021 Dec;74(6):506-513. doi: 10.4097/kja.21020. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
2
Analysis of judicial precedent cases regarding epidural injection in chronic pain management in Republic of Korea.韩国慢性疼痛管理中硬膜外注射司法先例案例分析。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 May;45(5):337-343. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-101169. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
3
Medicolegal Consideration to Prevent Medical Malpractice Regarding Opioid Administration: An Analysis of Judicial Opinion in South Korea.预防阿片类药物给药医疗事故的法医学考量:韩国司法意见分析
J Pain Res. 2020 Jun 25;13:1525-1532. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S256759. eCollection 2020.
4
A closed claims analysis of vocal cord injuries related to endotracheal intubation between 2004 and 2015.2004年至2015年间与气管插管相关的声带损伤的封闭索赔分析。
J Clin Anesth. 2020 May;61:109687. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.109687. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
5
Trigeminal nerve injuries following dental procedures: A retrospective analysis of malpractice claims from 2016 to 2023 in South Korea.牙科治疗后发生的三叉神经损伤:韩国 2016 年至 2023 年医疗事故索赔的回顾性分析。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2024 Aug;106:102730. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2024.102730. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
6
Prevention of medical malpractice and disputes through analysis of lawsuits related to coronary angiography and intervention.通过对冠状动脉造影及介入相关诉讼案件的分析,预防医疗纠纷及事故。
Korean J Intern Med. 2020 May;35(3):605-618. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2018.365. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
7
Descriptive Analysis of Federal and State Interventional Pain Malpractice Litigation in the United States: A Pilot Investigation.美国联邦和州干预性疼痛医疗过失诉讼的描述性分析:一项初步调查。
Pain Physician. 2020 Jul;23(4):413-422.
8
Analysis of acne-related judicial precedents from 1997 to 2018 in South Korea.分析韩国 1997 年至 2018 年与痤疮相关的司法判例。
J Dermatol. 2019 Dec;46(12):1210-1214. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.15119. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
9
Analysis of Judicial Precedents Cases Regarding Skin Cancer from 1997 to 2017 in Republic of Korea.1997年至2017年韩国皮肤癌司法判例案件分析。
Ann Dermatol. 2019 Jun;31(3):300-306. doi: 10.5021/ad.2019.31.3.300. Epub 2019 May 1.
10
Management of Difficult Tracheal Intubation: A Closed Claims Analysis.困难气管插管的管理:一项封闭索赔分析。
Anesthesiology. 2019 Oct;131(4):818-829. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002815.

引用本文的文献

1
Vocal Cord Paralysis after Tracheal Intubation: An Overview of the Etiology and Associated Risk Factors.气管插管后声带麻痹:病因及相关危险因素概述
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Jul 7;29(2):1-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1808244. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Effect of varying cuff sizes with identical inner diameter on endotracheal intubation in critically ill adults: A sealed tracheal controlled trial.不同内径相同的袖口尺寸对危重症成人气管插管的影响:一项密封气管对照试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jun 14;103(24):e38326. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038326.
3
Critical incidents associated with pediatric anesthesia: changes over 6 years at a tertiary children's hospital.与小儿麻醉相关的严重事件:一家三级儿童医院6年期间的变化
Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2022 Oct;17(4):386-396. doi: 10.17085/apm.22164. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
4
Difficult intubation: lessons learned from the courts of South Korea.困难插管:从韩国法院汲取的教训
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2021 Dec;74(6):463-464. doi: 10.4097/kja.21448. Epub 2021 Nov 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Medicolegal Consideration to Prevent Medical Malpractice Regarding Opioid Administration: An Analysis of Judicial Opinion in South Korea.预防阿片类药物给药医疗事故的法医学考量:韩国司法意见分析
J Pain Res. 2020 Jun 25;13:1525-1532. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S256759. eCollection 2020.
2
Analysis of judicial precedent cases regarding epidural injection in chronic pain management in Republic of Korea.韩国慢性疼痛管理中硬膜外注射司法先例案例分析。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 May;45(5):337-343. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-101169. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
3
Management of Difficult Tracheal Intubation: A Closed Claims Analysis.困难气管插管的管理:一项封闭索赔分析。
Anesthesiology. 2019 Oct;131(4):818-829. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002815.
4
Trends in medical disputes involving anesthesia during July 2009-June 2018: an analysis of the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists database.2009 年 7 月至 2018 年 6 月涉及麻醉的医疗纠纷趋势:韩国麻醉师学会数据库分析。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019 Apr;72(2):156-163. doi: 10.4097/kja.d.18.00198. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
5
Comparison of blind intubation via supraglottic airway devices versus standard intubation during different airway emergency scenarios in inexperienced hand: Randomized, crossover manikin trial.在经验不足者操作下,不同气道紧急情况中经声门上气道装置盲插与标准插管的比较:随机交叉人体模型试验
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct;97(40):e12593. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012593.
6
Supraglottic airway devices in difficult airway management: a retrospective cohort study of 658,104 general anaesthetics registered in the Danish Anaesthesia Database.声门上气道装置在困难气道管理中的应用:丹麦麻醉数据库中 658104 例全身麻醉的回顾性队列研究。
Anaesthesia. 2019 Feb;74(2):151-157. doi: 10.1111/anae.14443. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
7
Guidelines for the management of tracheal intubation in critically ill adults.《成人危重症患者气管插管管理指南》
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Feb;120(2):323-352. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.10.021. Epub 2017 Nov 26.
8
Temporal Trends in Difficult and Failed Tracheal Intubation in a Regional Community Anesthetic Practice.区域性社区麻醉实践中困难和失败的气管插管的时间趋势。
Anesthesiology. 2018 Mar;128(3):502-510. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001974.
9
Human and equipment resources for difficult airway management, airway education programs, and capnometry use in Japanese emergency departments: a nationwide cross-sectional study.日本急诊科困难气道管理、气道教育项目及二氧化碳监测使用的人力和设备资源:一项全国性横断面研究。
Int J Emerg Med. 2017 Sep 13;10(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12245-017-0155-6.
10
In-hospital airway management training for non-anesthesiologist EMS physicians: a descriptive quality control study.非麻醉科急救医师院内气道管理培训:描述性质量控制研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Apr 26;25(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0386-9.

韩国与气管插管相关的司法判例分析。

Analysis of endotracheal intubation-related judicial precedents in South Korea.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Medical Law and Ethics, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Anesthesiol. 2021 Dec;74(6):506-513. doi: 10.4097/kja.21020. Epub 2021 Mar 25.

DOI:10.4097/kja.21020
PMID:33761583
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8648513/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medical malpractice during endotracheal intubation can result in catastrophic complications. However, there are no reports on these severe complications in South Korea. We aimed to investigate the severe complications associated with endotracheal intubation occurring in South Korea, via medicolegal analysis.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the closed judicial precedents regarding complications related to endotracheal intubation lodged between January 1994 and June 2020, using the database of the Supreme Court of Korea. We collected clinical and judicial characteristics from the judgments and analyzed the medical malpractices related to endotracheal intubation.

RESULTS

Of 220 potential cases, 63 were included in the final analysis. The most common event location was the operating room (n = 20, 31.7%). All but 3 cases were associated with significant permanent or more severe injury, including 31 deaths. The most common problems were failed or delayed intubation (n = 56, 88.9%). Supraglottic airway device was used in 5.2% (n = 3) cases of delayed or failed intubation. Fifty-one (81%) cases were ruled in favor of the plaintiff in the claims for damages, with a median payment of Korean Won 133,897,845 (38,000,000, 308,538,274). The most common malpractice recognized by the court was that of not attempting an alternative airway technique (n = 32, 50.8%), followed by violation of the duty of explanation (n = 10, 15.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results could increase physicians' awareness of the major complications related to endotracheal intubation and help ensure patient safety.

摘要

背景

气管插管过程中的医疗事故可能导致灾难性的并发症。然而,韩国尚无关于这些严重并发症的报告。我们旨在通过法医学分析,调查韩国发生的与气管插管相关的严重并发症。

方法

我们通过韩国最高法院的数据库,回顾性分析了 1994 年 1 月至 2020 年 6 月期间提交的与气管插管相关并发症的封闭司法先例。我们从判决中收集了临床和司法特征,并分析了与气管插管相关的医疗事故。

结果

在 220 个潜在病例中,有 63 个被纳入最终分析。最常见的事件发生地点是手术室(n = 20,31.7%)。除 3 例外,所有病例均与显著的永久性或更严重的损伤有关,包括 31 例死亡。最常见的问题是插管失败或延迟(n = 56,88.9%)。在插管失败或延迟的病例中,有 5.2%(n = 3)使用了声门上气道装置。在损害赔偿请求中,有 51 例(81%)案件对原告有利,赔偿中位数为韩元 133,897,845 元(38,000,000 韩元,308,538,274 韩元)。法院认定的最常见医疗事故是未尝试替代气道技术(n = 32,50.8%),其次是违反解释义务(n = 10,15.9%)。

结论

我们的研究结果可以提高医生对与气管插管相关的主要并发症的认识,有助于确保患者安全。