• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patients, Public and Service Users are Experts by Experience: An Overview from Ophthalmology Research in Canada, UK and Beyond.患者、公众和服务使用者是经验专家:来自加拿大、英国及其他地区眼科研究的概述。
Ophthalmol Ther. 2020 Jun;9(2):207-213. doi: 10.1007/s40123-020-00237-x. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Community engagement and involvement in Ghana: conversations with community stakeholders to inform surgical research.加纳的社区参与:与社区利益相关者的对话,为外科研究提供信息。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jul 5;7(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00270-5.
4
Co-learning commentary: a patient partner perspective in mental health care research.共同学习评论:心理健康护理研究中患者伙伴的视角
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Apr 18;9(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00435-4.
5
Involving carer advisors in evidence synthesis to improve carers' mental health during end-of-life home care: co-production during COVID-19 remote working.让护理顾问参与证据综合工作以改善临终居家护理期间护理人员的心理健康:新冠疫情远程工作期间的共同制作。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Oct;13(8):1-48. doi: 10.3310/TGHH6428.
6
A Blueprint for Involvement: Reflections of lived experience co-researchers and academic researchers on working collaboratively.参与蓝图:生活经验共同研究者和学术研究者对合作的反思
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Dec 5;8(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00404-3.
7
The Canadian retinoblastoma research advisory board: a framework for patient engagement.加拿大视网膜母细胞瘤研究咨询委员会:患者参与框架
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Feb 28;6:7. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-0177-8. eCollection 2020.
8
Evaluation of a national training programme to support engagement in mental health services: Learning enablers and learning gains.评估一个支持参与心理健康服务的国家培训计划:学习促进因素和学习收益。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Nov;26(9-10):323-336. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12535. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
9
The value of involving patients and public in health services research and evaluation: a qualitative study.让患者和公众参与卫生服务研究与评估的价值:一项定性研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 29;7(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00289-8.
10
Patient and public involvement in research: the need for budgeting PPI staff costs in funding applications.患者及公众参与研究:在资助申请中为患者及公众参与(PPI)工作人员成本编制预算的必要性。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Mar 25;9(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00424-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementing patient and public involvement (PPI) in eye research: reflections from developing a research study on Geographic Atrophy treatment acceptability.在眼科研究中实施患者和公众参与(PPI):关于开展一项地理萎缩治疗可接受性研究的思考
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Aug 1;11(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00747-7.
2
Enhancing evidence-informed policymaking in medicine and healthcare: stakeholder involvement in the Commons Project for rare diseases in Japan.加强医学和医疗保健领域基于证据的政策制定:日本罕见病共同项目中的利益相关者参与
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Nov 29;9(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00515-5.
3
The top 10 retinoblastoma research priorities in Canada as determined by patients, clinicians and researchers: a patient-oriented priority-setting partnership.加拿大患者、临床医生和研究人员共同确定的视网膜母细胞瘤研究十大重点:以患者为中心的优先事项制定伙伴关系。
CMAJ Open. 2020 Jun 9;8(2):E420-E428. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20190221. Print 2020 Apr-Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
The Canadian retinoblastoma research advisory board: a framework for patient engagement.加拿大视网膜母细胞瘤研究咨询委员会:患者参与框架
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Feb 28;6:7. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-0177-8. eCollection 2020.
2
Meaningful Patient Engagement in Research: Lessons From Retinoblastoma.患者有意义地参与研究:视网膜母细胞瘤的经验教训
Pediatrics. 2019 Jun;143(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2166.
3
Participatory governance over research in an academic research network: the case of Diabetes Action Canada.参与式治理在学术研究网络中的研究:以加拿大糖尿病行动为例。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 20;9(4):e026828. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026828.
4
Ophthalmology research in the UK's National Health Service: the structure and performance of the NIHR's Ophthalmology research portfolio.英国国民保健制度中的眼科研究:NIHR 眼科研究组合的结构和绩效。
Eye (Lond). 2019 Apr;33(4):610-618. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0251-8. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
5
Patient engagement in Canada: a scoping review of the 'how' and 'what' of patient engagement in health research.加拿大的患者参与:对健康研究中患者参与的“方式”和“内容”的范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Feb 7;16(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0282-4.
6
GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research.GRIPP2报告清单:用于改善患者和公众参与研究报告的工具。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Aug 2;3:13. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0062-2. eCollection 2017.
7
Development and testing of a medline search filter for identifying patient and public involvement in health research.开发和测试一个用于识别健康研究中患者和公众参与的 Medline 搜索筛选器。
Health Info Libr J. 2017 Jun;34(2):125-133. doi: 10.1111/hir.12157. Epub 2017 Jan 1.
8
New and emerging technologies for the treatment of inherited retinal diseases: a horizon scanning review.遗传性视网膜疾病治疗的新兴技术:一项前瞻性扫描综述。
Eye (Lond). 2015 Sep;29(9):1131-40. doi: 10.1038/eye.2015.115. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
9
The Sight Loss and Vision Priority Setting Partnership (SLV-PSP): overview and results of the research prioritisation survey process.视力丧失与视力优先事项设定合作组织(SLV-PSP):研究优先排序调查过程的概述与结果
BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 23;4(7):e004905. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004905.

患者、公众和服务使用者是经验专家:来自加拿大、英国及其他地区眼科研究的概述。

Patients, Public and Service Users are Experts by Experience: An Overview from Ophthalmology Research in Canada, UK and Beyond.

作者信息

Skilton Andrew M, Low Leslie G, Dimaras Helen

机构信息

NIHR Biomedical Research Center, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.

NIHR Clinical Research Network Coordinating Center, London, UK.

出版信息

Ophthalmol Ther. 2020 Jun;9(2):207-213. doi: 10.1007/s40123-020-00237-x. Epub 2020 Feb 29.

DOI:10.1007/s40123-020-00237-x
PMID:32114666
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7196098/
Abstract

Discussion of the positive impact on research and mutual benefit that arises through genuine researcher and expert by experience collaboration has been noticeably absent from global sight loss and vision conferences. This article is co-authored by a parent advocate whose children have bilateral retinoblastoma, an eye health researcher and a practitioner in patient and public involvement in research who came together at the 2019 annual meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology to share their first-hand experiences. The aim of this commentary is to highlight good practice and encourage colleagues to pursue steps towards a more engaged ophthalmology research landscape globally.

摘要

在全球视力丧失和眼科会议上,对于真正的研究人员与经验丰富的专家合作所产生的对研究的积极影响和互利共赢的讨论明显缺失。本文由一位子女患有双侧视网膜母细胞瘤的家长倡导者、一位眼健康研究人员以及一位从事患者和公众参与研究工作的从业者共同撰写,他们在2019年视觉与眼科研究协会年会上相聚,分享了他们的第一手经验。本评论的目的是突出良好实践,并鼓励同行采取措施,在全球范围内营造更具参与性的眼科研究环境。