Mogk L G, Cyrlin M N
Kresge Eye Institute, Detroit, MI.
Ophthalmology. 1988 Jun;95(6):768-71. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(88)33110-6.
Two new cases of aplastic anemia possibly associated with Neptazane (methazolamide) are reported. Several previous authors, as well as the manufacturer of Diamox (acetazolamide) and Neptazane, have recommended routine blood counts for patients on carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Four surveys are presented of current practices with regard to blood monitoring. These include authors of case reports, 40 academic ophthalmologists, 81 ophthalmologists in private practice, and 66 glaucoma specialists. The vast majority does not routinely monitor blood counts of patients on carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. The value of routine blood monitoring is questionable both because of (1) the idiosyncratic, non-dose-related mechanism of the dyscrasias and (2) the variability of the timing of their onset and development. Regular observation and questioning of patients for symptoms are thought to be preferable. The importance of a thorough history when assigning an etiology to a dyscrasia is noted.
报告了两例可能与尼普他赞(甲醋唑胺)相关的再生障碍性贫血新病例。几位先前的作者以及醋氮酰胺(乙酰唑胺)和尼普他赞的制造商都建议对使用碳酸酐酶抑制剂的患者进行常规血细胞计数。本文介绍了四项关于血液监测现行做法的调查。这些调查对象包括病例报告的作者、40位学术眼科医生、81位私人执业眼科医生以及66位青光眼专家。绝大多数人并未对使用碳酸酐酶抑制剂的患者进行常规血细胞计数监测。常规血液监测的价值值得怀疑,原因如下:(1)血细胞异常的发生机制是特异质性的,与剂量无关;(2)其发作和发展的时间具有变异性。定期观察患者并询问症状被认为更为可取。文中指出,在为血细胞异常确定病因时,详尽病史的重要性。