From the Institute of Clinical Radiology (P.B.S., G. Bier, W.H., M. Wildgruber), University Hospital of Muenster, Germany.
Department of Pediatrics (R.S.), University Hospital of Muenster, Germany.
Stroke. 2020 Apr;51(4):1182-1189. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028221. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
Background and Purpose- The recent Save ChildS study provides multicenter evidence for the use of mechanical thrombectomy in children with large vessel occlusion arterial ischemic stroke. However, device selection for thrombectomy may influence rates of recanalization, complications, and neurological outcomes, especially in pediatric patients of different ages. We, therefore, performed additional analyses of the Save ChildS data to investigate a possible association of different thrombectomy techniques and devices with angiographic and clinical outcome parameters. Methods- The Save ChildS cohort study (January 2000-December 2018) analyzed data from 27 European and United States stroke centers and included all pediatric patients (<18 years), diagnosed with arterial ischemic stroke who underwent endovascular recanalization. Patients were grouped into first-line contact aspiration (A Direct Aspiration First Pass Technique [ADAPT]) and non-ADAPT groups as well as different stent retriever size groups. Associations with baseline characteristics, recanalization rates (modified Treatment in Cerebral Infarction), complication rates, and neurological outcome parameters (Pediatric National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale after 24 hours and 7 days; modified Rankin Scale and Pediatric Stroke Outcome Measure at discharge, after 6 and 24 months) were investigated. Results- Seventy-three patients with a median age of 11.3 years were included. Currently available stent retrievers were used in 59 patients (80.8%), of which 4×20 mm (width×length) was the most frequently chosen size (36 patients =61%). A first-line ADAPT approach was used in 7 patients (9.6%), and 7 patients (9.6%) were treated with first-generation thrombectomy devices. In this study, a first-line ADAPT approach was neither associated with the rate of successful recanalization (ADAPT 85.7% versus 87.5% No ADAPT) nor with the complication rate or the neurological outcome. Moreover, there were no associations of stent retriever sizes with rates of recanalization, complication rates, or outcome parameters. Conclusions- Our study suggests that neurological outcomes are generally good regardless of any specific device selection and suggests that it is important to offer thrombectomy in eligible children regardless of technique or device selection. Registration- URL: https://www.drks.de/; Unique identifier: DRKS00016528.
背景与目的-最近的 Save ChildS 研究提供了多中心证据,证明机械取栓术可用于治疗大动脉闭塞性缺血性卒中的儿童患者。然而,取栓装置的选择可能会影响再通率、并发症和神经功能结局,尤其是在不同年龄的儿科患者中。因此,我们对 Save ChildS 数据进行了额外分析,以研究不同的取栓技术和装置与血管造影和临床结局参数之间的可能关联。方法-Save ChildS 队列研究(2000 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月)分析了来自 27 个欧洲和美国卒中中心的数据,纳入了所有诊断为动脉缺血性卒中且接受血管内再通治疗的<18 岁儿科患者。将患者分为一线接触抽吸(直接抽吸第一通过技术[ADAPT])和非 ADAPT 组,以及不同支架取栓器尺寸组。研究了与基线特征、再通率(改良治疗大脑梗死)、并发症率和神经功能结局参数(24 小时和 7 天后的小儿国立卫生研究院卒中量表;出院时、6 个月和 24 个月时的改良 Rankin 量表和小儿卒中结局测量)之间的关联。结果-本研究纳入了 73 例中位年龄为 11.3 岁的患者。目前可用的支架取栓器用于 59 例患者(80.8%),其中最常选择的尺寸为 4×20mm(宽×长)(36 例=61%)。一线 ADAPT 方法用于 7 例患者(9.6%),7 例患者(9.6%)接受第一代取栓装置治疗。在本研究中,一线 ADAPT 方法既与再通率(ADAPT 85.7%与非 ADAPT 87.5%)无关联,也与并发症率或神经功能结局无关联。此外,支架取栓器尺寸与再通率、并发症率或结局参数之间均无关联。结论-本研究表明,无论选择何种特定装置,神经功能结局通常良好,并表明无论选择何种技术或装置,对符合条件的儿童进行取栓治疗都很重要。注册-网址:https://www.drks.de/;唯一标识符:DRKS00016528。