• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童卒中血管内血栓切除术的成本效益:Save ChildS研究分析

Cost-Effectiveness of Endovascular Thrombectomy in Childhood Stroke: An Analysis of the Save ChildS Study.

作者信息

Kunz Wolfgang G, Sporns Peter B, Psychogios Marios N, Fiehler Jens, Chapot René, Dorn Franziska, Grams Astrid, Morotti Andrea, Musolino Patricia, Lee Sarah, Kemmling André, Henkes Hans, Nikoubashman Omid, Wiesmann Martin, Jensen-Kondering Ulf, Möhlenbruch Markus, Schlamann Marc, Marik Wolfgang, Schob Stefan, Wendl Christina, Turowski Bernd, Götz Friedrich, Kaiser Daniel, Dimitriadis Konstantinos, Gersing Alexandra, Liebig Thomas, Ricke Jens, Reidler Paul, Wildgruber Moritz, Mönch Sebastian

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Department of Neuroradiology, Clinic for Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Stroke. 2022 Jan;24(1):138-147. doi: 10.5853/jos.2021.01606. Epub 2022 Jan 31.

DOI:10.5853/jos.2021.01606
PMID:35135067
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8829473/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The Save ChildS Study demonstrated that endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is a safe treatment option for pediatric stroke patients with large vessel occlusions (LVOs) with high recanalization rates. Our aim was to determine the long-term cost, health consequences and cost-effectiveness of EVT in this patient population.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, a decision-analytic Markov model estimated lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Early outcome parameters were based on the entire Save ChildS Study to model the EVT group. As no randomized data exist, the Save ChildS patient subgroup with unsuccessful recanalization was used to model the standard of care group. For modeling of lifetime estimates, pediatric and adult input parameters were obtained from the current literature. The analysis was conducted in a United States setting applying healthcare and societal perspectives. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set to $100,000 per QALY.

RESULTS

The model.

RESULTS

yielded EVT as the dominant (cost-effective as well as cost-saving) strategy for pediatric stroke patients. The incremental effectiveness for the average age of 11.3 years at first stroke in the Save ChildS Study was determined as an additional 4.02 lifetime QALYs, with lifetime cost-savings that amounted to $169,982 from a healthcare perspective and $254,110 when applying a societal perspective. Acceptability rates for EVT were 96.60% and 96.66% for the healthcare and societal perspectives.

CONCLUSIONS

EVT for pediatric stroke patients with LVOs resulted in added QALY and reduced lifetime costs. Based on the available data in the Save ChildS Study, EVT is very likely to be a cost-effective treatment strategy for childhood stroke.

摘要

背景与目的

儿童卒中挽救研究表明,血管内血栓切除术(EVT)是治疗大血管闭塞(LVO)的儿科卒中患者的一种安全治疗选择,再通率高。我们的目的是确定EVT在该患者群体中的长期成本、健康后果及成本效益。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,一个决策分析马尔可夫模型估计了终生成本和质量调整生命年(QALY)。早期结局参数基于整个儿童卒中挽救研究来模拟EVT组。由于不存在随机数据,儿童卒中挽救研究中再通失败的患者亚组被用于模拟标准治疗组。对于终生估计的建模,儿科和成人输入参数取自当前文献。分析是在美国环境下从医疗保健和社会角度进行的。进行了概率敏感性分析。支付意愿阈值设定为每QALY 100,000美元。

结果

该模型得出,EVT是儿科卒中患者的主导策略(具有成本效益且节省成本)。在儿童卒中挽救研究中,首次卒中时平均年龄为11.3岁的患者,EVT的增量效益被确定为终生额外增加4.02个QALY,从医疗保健角度看,终生成本节省达169,982美元,从社会角度看为254,110美元。从医疗保健和社会角度看,EVT的可接受率分别为96.60%和96.66%。

结论

对患有LVO的儿科卒中患者进行EVT可增加QALY并降低终生成本。基于儿童卒中挽救研究中的现有数据,EVT很可能是儿童卒中的一种具有成本效益的治疗策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/8829473/280120e17894/jos-2021-01606f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/8829473/ba330cb624eb/jos-2021-01606f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/8829473/4a0134bf1e06/jos-2021-01606f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/8829473/d87046ddb5a7/jos-2021-01606f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/8829473/280120e17894/jos-2021-01606f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/8829473/ba330cb624eb/jos-2021-01606f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/8829473/4a0134bf1e06/jos-2021-01606f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/8829473/d87046ddb5a7/jos-2021-01606f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/8829473/280120e17894/jos-2021-01606f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of Endovascular Thrombectomy in Childhood Stroke: An Analysis of the Save ChildS Study.儿童卒中血管内血栓切除术的成本效益:Save ChildS研究分析
J Stroke. 2022 Jan;24(1):138-147. doi: 10.5853/jos.2021.01606. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of Endovascular Stroke Therapy: A Patient Subgroup Analysis From a US Healthcare Perspective.血管内卒中治疗的成本效益:从美国医疗保健视角进行的患者亚组分析
Stroke. 2016 Nov;47(11):2797-2804. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014147. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
3
Cost-effectiveness of endovascular thrombectomy with alteplase versus endovascular thrombectomy alone for acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion.血管内溶栓联合阿替普酶与单纯血管内取栓治疗大动脉闭塞性急性缺血性脑卒中的成本效果分析。
CMAJ Open. 2023 May 16;11(3):E443-E450. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20220096. Print 2023 May-Jun.
4
Cost-effectiveness of remote robotic mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性卒中远程机器人机械取栓术的成本效益
J Neurosurg. 2023 Jan 20;139(3):721-731. doi: 10.3171/2022.12.JNS222115. Print 2023 Sep 1.
5
Endovascular thrombectomy in patients with large core ischemic stroke: a cost-effectiveness analysis from the SELECT study.大核心梗死性卒中患者的血管内血栓切除术:SELECT 研究的成本效益分析。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2021 Oct;13(10):875-882. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016766. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
6
Lifetime quality of life and cost consequences of delays in endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke: a cost-effectiveness analysis from a Singapore healthcare perspective.急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗延迟对终身生活质量和成本的影响:从新加坡医疗保健角度进行的成本效益分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 17;10(9):e036517. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036517.
7
Cost-effectiveness of Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient Age.血管内治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的成本效益:患者年龄影响的系统评价。
Radiology. 2018 Aug;288(2):518-526. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018172886. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
8
Impact of collateral flow on cost-effectiveness of endovascular thrombectomy.侧支循环对血管内血栓切除术成本效益的影响。
J Neurosurg. 2022 Apr 29;137(6):1801-1810. doi: 10.3171/2022.2.JNS212887. Print 2022 Dec 1.
9
Cost-effectiveness of endovascular treatment versus best medical management in basilar artery occlusion stroke: A U.S. healthcare perspective.基底动脉闭塞性脑卒中血管内治疗与最佳药物治疗的成本效益:美国医疗保健视角。
Eur Stroke J. 2024 Mar;9(1):97-104. doi: 10.1177/23969873231209616. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
10
Cost-effectiveness of thrombectomy in patients with minor stroke and large vessel occlusion: effect of thrombus location on cost-effectiveness and outcomes.轻度卒中合并大血管闭塞患者血栓切除术的成本效益:血栓位置对成本效益和结局的影响。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Jan;15(1):39-45. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018375. Epub 2022 Jan 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2021 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.心脏病与中风统计-2021 更新:美国心脏协会报告。
Circulation. 2021 Feb 23;143(8):e254-e743. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000950. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
2
Hyperacute Recanalization Strategies and Childhood Stroke in the Evidence Age.超急性期再通策略与儿童卒中的循证时代
Stroke. 2021 Jan;52(1):381-384. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031133. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
3
United States Life Tables, 2018.美国生命表,2018 年。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2020 Nov;69(12):1-45.
4
Clinical Diffusion Mismatch to Select Pediatric Patients for Embolectomy 6 to 24 Hours After Stroke: An Analysis of the Save ChildS Study.发病 6 至 24 小时后行取栓术治疗的儿童脑卒中患者的临床弥散-灌注不匹配评估筛选:Save ChildS 研究分析。
Neurology. 2021 Jan 19;96(3):e343-e351. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011107. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
5
Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Considerations in Children.机械取栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中:儿童相关考虑因素。
Stroke. 2020 Oct;51(10):3174-3181. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029698. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
6
Thrombectomy in Childhood Stroke: Important Considerations in Borderline Indications.儿童卒中的血栓切除术:临界适应症的重要考量因素
Stroke. 2020 Oct;51(10):2890-2891. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032038. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
7
Does Device Selection Impact Recanalization Rate and Neurological Outcome?: An Analysis of the Save ChildS Study.器械选择是否影响再通率和神经功能结局?——Save ChildS 研究分析。
Stroke. 2020 Apr;51(4):1182-1189. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028221. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
8
Risk of Intracranial Hemorrhage Following Intravenous tPA (Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator) for Acute Stroke Is Low in Children.儿童急性脑卒中静脉注射 tPA(组织型纤溶酶原激活物)后颅内出血的风险较低。
Stroke. 2020 Feb;51(2):542-548. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027225. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
9
Feasibility, Safety, and Outcome of Endovascular Recanalization in Childhood Stroke: The Save ChildS Study.儿童脑卒中血管内再通的可行性、安全性和结局:Save ChildS 研究。
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Jan 1;77(1):25-34. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.3403.
10
Clinical benefit of thrombectomy in stroke patients with low ASPECTS is mediated by oedema reduction.血栓切除术对低 ASPECTS 卒中患者的临床获益是通过减轻水肿介导的。
Brain. 2019 May 1;142(5):1399-1407. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz057.