• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Prospective Multicenter Registry on Feasibility, Safety, and Outcome of Endovascular Recanalization in Childhood Stroke (Save ChildS Pro).儿童卒中血管内再通的可行性、安全性及结局的前瞻性多中心注册研究(拯救儿童卒中计划)
Front Neurol. 2021 Sep 3;12:736092. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.736092. eCollection 2021.
2
Endovascular thrombectomy for childhood stroke (Save ChildS Pro): an international, multicentre, prospective registry study.血管内血栓切除术治疗儿童脑卒中(Save ChildS Pro):一项国际性、多中心、前瞻性登记研究。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2024 Dec;8(12):882-890. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(24)00233-5. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
3
Feasibility, Safety, and Outcome of Endovascular Recanalization in Childhood Stroke: The Save ChildS Study.儿童脑卒中血管内再通的可行性、安全性和结局:Save ChildS 研究。
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Jan 1;77(1):25-34. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.3403.
4
Does Device Selection Impact Recanalization Rate and Neurological Outcome?: An Analysis of the Save ChildS Study.器械选择是否影响再通率和神经功能结局?——Save ChildS 研究分析。
Stroke. 2020 Apr;51(4):1182-1189. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028221. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
5
Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中动脉内脑溶栓的试验设计与报告标准。
Stroke. 2003 Aug;34(8):e109-37. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000082721.62796.09. Epub 2003 Jul 17.
6
Cost-Effectiveness of Endovascular Thrombectomy in Childhood Stroke: An Analysis of the Save ChildS Study.儿童卒中血管内血栓切除术的成本效益:Save ChildS研究分析
J Stroke. 2022 Jan;24(1):138-147. doi: 10.5853/jos.2021.01606. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
7
Mechanical thrombectomy in patients with medical contraindications for intravenous thrombolysis: a prospective observational study.静脉溶栓存在医学禁忌证患者的机械取栓术:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Nov;9(11):1041-1046. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012727. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
8
Management of acute ischemic stroke due to tandem occlusion: should endovascular recanalization of the extracranial or intracranial occlusive lesion be done first?串联闭塞所致急性缺血性卒中的管理:颅外或颅内闭塞病变的血管内再通应先进行哪一个?
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Apr;42(4):E16. doi: 10.3171/2017.1.FOCUS16500.
9
The Safety and Feasibility of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Mild Acute Ischemic Stroke With Large Vessel Occlusion.机械取栓治疗伴有大血管闭塞的轻度急性缺血性脑卒中的安全性和可行性。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Jun 1;86(6):802-807. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz354.
10
Mechanical Thrombectomy for Minor and Mild Stroke Patients Harboring Large Vessel Occlusion in the Anterior Circulation: A Multicenter Cohort Study.前循环大血管闭塞的轻中度卒中患者的机械取栓术:一项多中心队列研究
Stroke. 2017 Dec;48(12):3274-3281. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018113. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
The new Italian registry of infantile thrombosis (RITI): A reflection on its journey, challenges and pitfalls.意大利新的婴儿血栓形成登记处(RITI):对其历程、挑战和陷阱的思考。
Front Pediatr. 2023 Apr 20;11:1094246. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1094246. eCollection 2023.
2
Mechanical Thrombectomy for Pediatric Large Vessel Occlusions : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.儿童大血管闭塞的机械取栓:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2023 Sep;33(3):635-644. doi: 10.1007/s00062-022-01246-y. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
3
Influence of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and mean platelet volume on severity and short-term prognosis of acute ischemic stroke.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值及平均血小板体积对急性缺血性卒中严重程度和短期预后的影响
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Jun 15;14(6):4066-4073. eCollection 2022.
4
Cerebral ischemia in the developing brain.发育中大脑的脑缺血。
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2022 Oct;42(10):1777-1796. doi: 10.1177/0271678X221111600. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
5
Childhood stroke.儿童中风。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022 Feb 24;8(1):12. doi: 10.1038/s41572-022-00337-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Hyperacute Recanalization Strategies and Childhood Stroke in the Evidence Age.超急性期再通策略与儿童卒中的循证时代
Stroke. 2021 Jan;52(1):381-384. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031133. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
2
Clinical Diffusion Mismatch to Select Pediatric Patients for Embolectomy 6 to 24 Hours After Stroke: An Analysis of the Save ChildS Study.发病 6 至 24 小时后行取栓术治疗的儿童脑卒中患者的临床弥散-灌注不匹配评估筛选:Save ChildS 研究分析。
Neurology. 2021 Jan 19;96(3):e343-e351. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011107. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
3
Thrombectomy in Childhood Stroke: Important Considerations in Borderline Indications.儿童卒中的血栓切除术:临界适应症的重要考量因素
Stroke. 2020 Oct;51(10):2890-2891. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032038. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
4
Does Device Selection Impact Recanalization Rate and Neurological Outcome?: An Analysis of the Save ChildS Study.器械选择是否影响再通率和神经功能结局?——Save ChildS 研究分析。
Stroke. 2020 Apr;51(4):1182-1189. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028221. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
5
Feasibility, Safety, and Outcome of Endovascular Recanalization in Childhood Stroke: The Save ChildS Study.儿童脑卒中血管内再通的可行性、安全性和结局:Save ChildS 研究。
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Jan 1;77(1):25-34. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.3403.
6
Thrombectomy in Childhood Stroke.儿童脑卒中取栓术。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Mar 5;8(5):e011335. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011335.
7
Feasibility, safety, and outcome of recanalization treatment in childhood stroke.儿童脑卒中血管再通治疗的可行性、安全性和结局。
Ann Neurol. 2018 Jun;83(6):1125-1132. doi: 10.1002/ana.25242.
8
Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials.血管内血栓切除术治疗大动脉闭塞性缺血性卒中的Meta 分析:来自五项随机试验的个体患者数据汇总分析
Lancet. 2016 Apr 23;387(10029):1723-31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
9
Thrombolysis in pediatric stroke study.小儿卒中溶栓研究
Stroke. 2015 Mar;46(3):880-5. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.008210. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
10
Childhood arterial ischaemic stroke incidence, presenting features, and risk factors: a prospective population-based study.儿童动脉缺血性脑卒中的发病率、临床表现和危险因素:一项前瞻性基于人群的研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2014 Jan;13(1):35-43. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70290-4. Epub 2013 Dec 2.

儿童卒中血管内再通的可行性、安全性及结局的前瞻性多中心注册研究(拯救儿童卒中计划)

A Prospective Multicenter Registry on Feasibility, Safety, and Outcome of Endovascular Recanalization in Childhood Stroke (Save ChildS Pro).

作者信息

Sporns Peter B, Kemmling André, Lee Sarah, Fullerton Heather, Kunz Wolfgang G, Wilson Jenny L, Mackay Mark T, Steinlin Maja, Fiehler Jens, Psychogios Marios, Wildgruber Moritz

机构信息

Department of Neuroradiology, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2021 Sep 3;12:736092. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.736092. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2021.736092
PMID:34539563
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8446378/
Abstract

Early evidence for the benefit of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in pediatric patients with intracranial large vessel occlusion has been shown in previous retrospective cohorts. Higher-level evidence is needed to overcome the limitations of these studies such as the lack of a control group and the retrospective design. Randomized trials will very likely not be feasible, and several open questions remain, for example, the impact of arteriopathic etiologies or a possible lower age limit for MT. Save ChildS Pro therefore aims to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of MT in pediatric patients compared to the best medical management and intravenous thrombolysis. Save ChildS Pro is designed as a worldwide multicenter prospective registry comparing the safety and effectiveness of MT to the best medical care alone in the treatment of pediatric arterial ischemic stroke (AIS). It will include pediatric patients (<18 years) with symptomatic acute intracranial arterial occlusion who underwent either MT or best medical treatment including intravenous thrombolysis. The primary endpoint of Save ChildS Pro is the modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days post-stroke. Secondary endpoints will comprise the decrease of the Pediatric National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score from admission to discharge and rate of complications. Save ChildS Pro aims to provide high-level evidence for MT for pediatric patients with AIS, thereby improving functional outcome and quality of life and reducing the individual, societal, and economic burden of death and disability resulting from pediatric stroke. Save ChildS Pro is registered at the German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS; identifier: DRKS00018960).

摘要

先前的回顾性队列研究已显示了机械取栓术(MT)对患有颅内大血管闭塞的儿科患者有益的早期证据。需要更高级别的证据来克服这些研究的局限性,例如缺乏对照组和回顾性设计。随机试验很可能不可行,并且仍存在几个未解决的问题,例如动脉病变病因的影响或MT可能的更低年龄限制。因此,“拯救儿童卒中计划(Save ChildS Pro)”旨在证明与最佳药物治疗和静脉溶栓相比,MT在儿科患者中的安全性和有效性。“拯救儿童卒中计划”被设计为一项全球多中心前瞻性注册研究,比较MT与单纯最佳药物治疗在治疗小儿动脉缺血性卒中(AIS)方面的安全性和有效性。它将纳入患有症状性急性颅内动脉闭塞且接受了MT或包括静脉溶栓在内的最佳药物治疗的儿科患者(<18岁)。“拯救儿童卒中计划”的主要终点是卒中后90天的改良Rankin量表评分。次要终点将包括从入院到出院时小儿国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分的降低以及并发症发生率。“拯救儿童卒中计划”旨在为患有AIS的儿科患者的MT提供高级别证据,从而改善功能结局和生活质量,并减轻小儿卒中导致的个人、社会以及死亡和残疾的经济负担。“拯救儿童卒中计划”已在德国临床试验注册中心(DRKS;标识符:DRKS00018960)注册。