超声多模态评分在人工流产患者子宫内膜容受性评估中的应用
Application of ultrasound multimodal score in the assessment of endometrial receptivity in patients with artificial abortion.
作者信息
Jiao Yan, Xue Nianyu, Shui Xujuan, Yu Caicha, Hu Chunhong
机构信息
Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No. 188 Shizi Street, Suzhou, 215006, China.
Obstetrics and Gynecology Ultrasonic Department, Wenzhou Peoples' Hospital, Wenzhou, 325000, China.
出版信息
Insights Imaging. 2020 Mar 2;11(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13244-020-0840-5.
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to evaluate the value and feasibility of ultrasound multimodal score in the evaluation of endometrial receptivity in patients with artificial abortion (AA).
METHODS
Sixty-eight patients with AA (AA group) and 70 women of the childbearing age without any history of abortion (control group) were recruited between January 2018 and December 2018. All subjects received the examination of endometrium in the middle luteum phase (7-9 days after ovulation) with two-dimensional gray-scale ultrasound, two-dimensional color Doppler ultrasound, and three-dimensional ultrasound, and the quantitative scores were obtained and compared between two groups.
RESULTS
The quantitative score of endometrial receptivity was 10.46 ± 2.99 in the AA group and 13.49 ± 2.21 in the control group showing significant difference (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Ultrasound multimodal quantitative scores can be used to evaluate the endometrial receptivity of patients with AA.
背景
本研究旨在评估超声多模态评分在人工流产患者子宫内膜容受性评估中的价值及可行性。
方法
选取2018年1月至2018年12月期间68例人工流产患者（人工流产组）和70例无流产史的育龄期女性（对照组）。所有受试者在黄体中期（排卵后7 - 9天）接受二维灰阶超声、二维彩色多普勒超声及三维超声检查子宫内膜，获取定量评分并在两组间进行比较。
结果
人工流产组子宫内膜容受性定量评分为10.46 ± 2.99，对照组为13.49 ± 2.21，差异有统计学意义（p < 0.05）。
结论
超声多模态定量评分可用于评估人工流产患者的子宫内膜容受性。
Zotero 插件