Suppr超能文献

护士和护理人员的职业偏好类型有哪些?对幸福感有何影响?:范围综述。

What occupational preference types dominate among nurses and paramedics with implications for wellbeing?: A scoping review.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Faculty of Education, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Nurs Health Sci. 2020 Sep;22(3):507-520. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12699. Epub 2020 Mar 20.

Abstract

Understanding the occupational typological nature of nursing and paramedicine and the typological preferences of these within the professions offers significant evidence of factors that can facilitate wellbeing and efficiencies. Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage scoping methodology was used to review the literature. The research question used to guide this scoping review was: Which Holland code is more dominant among nurses and paramedics? Nine articles were included in this review, from which two broad themes emerged: Job satisfaction/academic success; and personality-employment fit across gender and subgroups within the same occupation. While the Social (S) personality type dominated across the studies for both nurses and paramedics, overall, the studies identified various combinations of the personality profile and, in some cases, personality types foreign to the occupation also formed part of the Holland code. Congruence can be thought of as playing an important role in nurses'/paramedics' overall well-being regardless of the order of their three dominant personality types.

摘要

了解护理和辅助医疗职业的职业类型学性质以及这些职业内部的类型学偏好,为促进幸福感和效率的因素提供了重要证据。阿特塞和奥马利的五阶段范围界定方法被用于审查文献。用于指导这一范围界定审查的研究问题是:在护士和辅助医务人员中,哪种霍兰德代码更为突出?本综述纳入了九篇文章,从中出现了两个广泛的主题:工作满意度/学业成功;以及跨性别和同一职业内的子群体的人格-就业匹配。虽然在护士和辅助医务人员的所有研究中,社会(S)人格类型都占主导地位,但总的来说,这些研究确定了人格特征的各种组合,在某些情况下,与职业无关的人格类型也构成了霍兰德代码的一部分。无论他们的三个主导人格类型的顺序如何,一致性都可以被认为在护士/辅助医务人员的整体幸福感中起着重要作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验