Li Yao, Sun Chao, Li Pengzu, Zhao Yunpeng, Mensah Godfred Kim, Xu Yong, Guo Hao, Chen Junjie
College of Information and Computer, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, China.
College of Arts, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, China.
Front Neurosci. 2020 Feb 12;14:60. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00060. eCollection 2020.
Recent works have shown that the resting-state brain functional connectivity hypernetwork, where multiple nodes can be connected, are an effective technique for brain disease diagnosis and classification research. The lasso method was used to construct hypernetworks by solving sparse linear regression models in previous research. But, constructing a hypernetwork based on the lasso method simply selects a single variable, in that it lacks the ability to interpret the grouping effect. Considering the group structure problem, the previous study proposed to create a hypernetwork based on the elastic net and the group lasso methods, and the results showed that the former method had the best classification performance. However, the highly correlated variables selected by the elastic net method were not necessarily in the active set in the group. Therefore, we extended our research to address this issue. Herein, we propose a new method that introduces the sparse group lasso method to improve the construction of the hypernetwork by solving the group structure problem of the brain regions. We used the traditional lasso, group lasso method, and sparse group lasso method to construct a hypernetwork in patients with depression and normal subjects. Meanwhile, other clustering coefficients (clustering coefficients based on pairs of nodes) were also introduced to extract features with traditional clustering coefficients. Two types of features with significant differences obtained after feature selection were subjected to multi-kernel learning for feature fusion and classification using each method, respectively. The network topology results revealed differences among the three networks, where hypernetwork using the lasso method was the strictest; the group lasso, most lenient; and the sgLasso method, moderate. The network topology of the sparse group lasso method was similar to that of the group lasso method but different from the lasso method. The classification results show that the sparse group lasso method achieves the best classification accuracy by using multi-kernel learning, which indicates that better classification performance can be achieved when the group structure exists and is properly extended.
近期研究表明,静息态脑功能连接超网络(多个节点可相互连接)是一种用于脑部疾病诊断和分类研究的有效技术。在先前研究中,套索方法通过求解稀疏线性回归模型来构建超网络。但是,基于套索方法构建超网络只是简单地选择单个变量,缺乏解释分组效应的能力。考虑到组结构问题,先前的研究提出基于弹性网和组套索方法创建超网络,结果表明前一种方法具有最佳的分类性能。然而,弹性网方法选择的高度相关变量不一定在组的活动集中。因此,我们扩展研究以解决此问题。在此,我们提出一种新方法,即引入稀疏组套索方法,通过解决脑区的组结构问题来改进超网络的构建。我们使用传统套索、组套索方法和稀疏组套索方法在抑郁症患者和正常受试者中构建超网络。同时,还引入了其他聚类系数(基于节点对的聚类系数),以便与传统聚类系数一起提取特征。经过特征选择后获得的两种具有显著差异的特征分别使用每种方法进行多核学习以进行特征融合和分类。网络拓扑结果显示三个网络之间存在差异,其中使用套索方法的超网络最严格;组套索方法最宽松;稀疏组套索方法适中。稀疏组套索方法的网络拓扑与组套索方法相似,但与套索方法不同。分类结果表明,稀疏组套索方法通过使用多核学习实现了最佳分类准确率,这表明当存在组结构并进行适当扩展时可以实现更好的分类性能。