Vaz Joao R, Rand Troy, Fujan-Hansen Jessica, Mukherjee Mukul, Stergiou Nick
Department of Biomechanics, University of Nebraska Omaha, Omaha, NE, United States.
CIPER, Faculty of Human Kinetics, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Front Physiol. 2020 Feb 11;11:67. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00067. eCollection 2020.
Walking synchronized to external cues is a common practice in clinical settings. Several research studies showed that this popular gait rehabilitation tool alters gait variability. There is also recent evidence which suggests that alterations in the temporal structure of the external cues could restore gait variability at healthy levels. It is unknown, however, if such alterations produce similar effects if the cueing modalities used are different; visual or auditory. The modality could affect gait variability differentially, since there is evidence that auditory cues mostly act in the temporal domain of gait, while visual cues act in the spatial domain of gait. This study investigated how synchronizing steps with visual and auditory cues that are presented with different temporal structures could affect gait variability during treadmill walking. Three different temporal structured stimuli were used, invariant, fractal and random, in both modalities. Stride times, length and speed were determined, and their fractal scaling (an indicator of complexity) and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated. No differences were observed in the CV, regardless of the cueing modality and the temporal structure of the stimuli. In terms of the stride time's fractal scaling, we observed that the fractal stimulus induced higher values compared to random and invariant stimuli. The same was also observed in stride length, but only for the visual cueing modality. No differences were observed for stride speed. The selection of the cueing modality seems to be an important feature of gait rehabilitation. Visual cues are possibly a better choice due to the dependency on vision during walking. This is particularly evident during treadmill walking, a common practice in a clinical setting. Because of the treadmill effect on the temporal domain of gait, the use of auditory cues can be minimal, compared to visual cues.
与外部提示同步行走是临床环境中的常见做法。多项研究表明,这种流行的步态康复工具会改变步态变异性。最近也有证据表明,外部提示时间结构的改变可以将步态变异性恢复到健康水平。然而,尚不清楚如果使用的提示方式不同(视觉或听觉),这种改变是否会产生类似的效果。提示方式可能会对步态变异性产生不同的影响,因为有证据表明听觉提示主要作用于步态的时间域,而视觉提示作用于步态的空间域。本研究调查了与具有不同时间结构的视觉和听觉提示同步步幅如何影响跑步机行走过程中的步态变异性。在两种模式中都使用了三种不同时间结构的刺激:不变的、分形的和随机的。确定步幅时间、步幅长度和速度,并计算它们的分形标度(复杂性指标)和变异系数(CV)。无论提示方式和刺激的时间结构如何,在CV方面均未观察到差异。就步幅时间的分形标度而言,我们观察到分形刺激比随机和不变刺激诱导出更高的值。步幅长度方面也观察到了同样的情况,但仅针对视觉提示模式。步幅速度方面未观察到差异。提示方式的选择似乎是步态康复的一个重要特征。由于行走过程中对视觉的依赖,视觉提示可能是更好的选择。这在跑步机行走(临床环境中的常见做法)过程中尤为明显。由于跑步机对步态时间域的影响,与视觉提示相比,听觉提示的使用可以最少。