Caviezel Marco P, Reichert Carolin F, Sadeghi Bahmani Dena, Linnemann Christoph, Liechti Caroline, Bieri Oliver, Borgwardt Stefan, Leyhe Thomas, Melcher Tobias
Center of Old Age Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Hospital (UPK), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Transfaculty Research Platform Molecular and Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 3;10:1002. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.01002. eCollection 2019.
The literature describes a basic neurofunctional antagonism between episodic memory encoding and retrieval with opposed patterns of neural activation and deactivation, particularly in posterior midline regions. This has been coined the encoding/retrieval (E/R) flip. The present fMRI study uses an innovative task paradigm to further elucidate neurofunctional relations of encoding and retrieval in associative memory. Thereby, memory encoding is implemented as implicit (non-deliberate) cognitive process, whereas the prior literature focused mainly on explicit encoding. Moreover, instead of defining brain activations related to successful (vs. unsuccessful) memory performance, the task paradigm provides proper no-memory baseline conditions. More specifically, the encoding task includes trials with non-contingent (not learnable) stimulus combinations, while the retrieval task uses trials with a simple matching exercise with no mnemonic requirements. The analyses revealed circumscribed activation in the posterior middle cingulate cortex (pMCC) together with prominent deactivation in the anterior insula cortex (aIC) as core neural substrate of implicit memory encoding. Thereby, the pMCC exhibited positive functional connectivity to the hippocampus. Memory retrieval was related to an activation pattern exactly opposed to memory encoding with deactivation in the pMCC and activation in the aIC, while the aIC additionally exhibited a negative (i.e., arguably inhibitive) functional connectivity to the pMCC. Important to note, the observed pattern of activations/de-activations in the pMCC appears to conflict with prevalent E/R flip findings. The outlined results and their (alleged) discrepancies with prior study reports are discussed primarily in the context of the default mode network's functioning and its context-sensitive regulation. Finally, we point out the relevance of the present work for the understanding and further investigation of the neurofunctional aberrations occurring during normal and pathological aging.
文献描述了情景记忆编码与提取之间存在基本的神经功能拮抗作用,其神经激活和失活模式相反,尤其是在后部中线区域。这被称为编码/提取(E/R)翻转。本功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究使用一种创新的任务范式,以进一步阐明联想记忆中编码与提取的神经功能关系。由此,记忆编码被实现为一种隐性(非刻意)认知过程,而先前的文献主要关注显性编码。此外,该任务范式并非定义与成功(与不成功)记忆表现相关的大脑激活,而是提供了适当的无记忆基线条件。更具体地说,编码任务包括非偶然(不可学习)刺激组合的试验,而提取任务使用无记忆要求的简单匹配练习试验。分析揭示,后扣带回中部皮质(pMCC)出现局限性激活,同时前岛叶皮质(aIC)出现显著失活,这是隐性记忆编码的核心神经基质。由此,pMCC与海马体表现出正功能连接。记忆提取与一种激活模式相关,该模式与记忆编码完全相反,pMCC失活而aIC激活,同时aIC与pMCC还表现出负(即可认为是抑制性)功能连接。需要注意的是,在pMCC中观察到的激活/失活模式似乎与普遍的E/R翻转结果相冲突。所概述的结果及其与先前研究报告(所谓的)差异主要在默认模式网络的功能及其上下文敏感调节的背景下进行讨论。最后,我们指出本研究对于理解和进一步研究正常和病理性衰老过程中发生的神经功能异常的相关性。