Suppr超能文献

在军事门诊治疗计划的常规条件下使用时,两种自杀筛查工具的心理计量学评估。

Psychometric assessment of two suicide screeners when used under routine conditions in military outpatient treatment programs.

机构信息

U.S. Public Health Service and Naval Medical Center Portsmouth.

Department of Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte.

出版信息

Psychol Serv. 2021 Aug;18(3):433-439. doi: 10.1037/ser0000416. Epub 2020 Mar 2.

Abstract

Suicide remains a pressing problem among active-duty military personnel. Recent Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense suicide prevention practice guidelines highlight the need for further screening research. The present study assessed the psychometric properties of 2 common self-report suicide screening tools: the Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R) and the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ideation subscale. Data ( = 200 active-duty personnel) were drawn from medical records and self-report questionnaires from 2 outpatient treatment settings in a military hospital. Primary findings include: (a) confirmatory factor analytic support for the SBQ-R but not the self-report version of the C-SSRS ideation severity subscale; and (b) acceptable reliability for both the SBQ-R and C-SSRS ideation severity subscale. Recommendations are offered for military suicide screening practice and research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

现役军人的自杀问题仍然是一个紧迫的问题。最近退伍军人事务部和国防部的自杀预防实践指南强调了进一步进行筛查研究的必要性。本研究评估了两种常见的自我报告自杀筛查工具的心理测量特性:修订后的自杀行为问卷(SBQ-R)和哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表(C-SSRS)意念分量表。数据(= 200 名现役人员)来自军事医院的 2 个门诊治疗环境中的医疗记录和自我报告问卷。主要发现包括:(a)对 SBQ-R 的验证性因素分析支持,但对 C-SSRS 意念严重程度分量表的自我报告版本则不支持;以及(b)SBQ-R 和 C-SSRS 意念严重程度分量表都具有可接受的可靠性。为军事自杀筛查实践和研究提供了建议。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验